butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

butlincat's blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

This site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they have been since. "Shadowbanning" is the act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community - see more: What is SHADOWBANNING: Twitter: are you shadowbanned? - truther sites are targeted, eg: NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media - "Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others." - Charles Bukowski

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption”...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

...hello + welcome!....FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License..... For more information please visit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Targeted? victimised?...been dealt particularly "rough justice"? meet some who have, and still are! VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

This blog is for regular updates + info connected to the ILLUMINATI, 911, 7/7, recent UFO sightings, CHEMTRAILS, MORGELLONS [98% OF WORLDS POPULATION HAS MORGELLONS DISEASE, they claim - see #Morgellons & #SmartDust Infect Individuals to be Tracked via Satellite https://www.youtu.be/RvNDk2t8TGk], MIND CONTROL {MK ULTRA.MANNEQUIN etc.}, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, JOHN LEAR, ALEX COLLIER, PROJECT CAMELOT, PROJECT AVALON, MICHAEL TSARION, JORDAN MAXWELL, PRESTON NICHOLS, AL BIELEK, STEWART SWERDELOW, DUNCAN CAMERON, WILLIAM COOPER, PHIL SCHNEIDER, David Wilcock, FRITZ SPRINGMEIER, BILLY MEIER, MAX IGAN, STEW WEBB, "Democracy Now!", Henry Makow, Linda Moulton-Howe, Dan Burisch, Webster Tarpley, Brother Nathanael, Timothy Good, Miles Johnson, Jim Marrs, John Hutchison, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Dr. John Hall, Edward Snowden, Vladimir Putin, John Lennon, Bob Zimmerman + many more who can only be described as heroes...

Wordpress: VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/butlincat

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/butlin.cat.9

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap." Galatians 6:7

......Namaste.....John Graham - butlincat

Jai guru deva om जय गुरुदेव ॐ


Wednesday, 31 August 2011

my TSARION - ARCHITECTS OF CONTROL PT. 1 - X8

ELENIN CHANGES ROUTE BEFORE EXPLOSION AT JUPITER

ELENIN CHANGES ROUTE JUST BEFORE THE EXPLOSION AT JUPITER

ELENIN - RICHARD C HOAGLAND - SOME FACTS YOU DIDNT KNOW - COAST 2 COAST RASIO 29 8 11

ELENIN - COAST TO COAST AM RADIO 29 AUG 2011



Richard C Hoagland : Coast To Coast AM : International Space Shuttle Conspiracy 29 / 8 / 2011

CAFCASS - AN ORGANISED CONSPIRACY

http://www.mensaid.com/flr.htm

CONFIDENTIALITY
- & -
THE SECRET HISTORY of FAMILY LAW REFORM

The ending of confidentiality in the family courts is a welcome
forward step. But, of itself, the removal of confidentiality does not
alter anything. Its effect is to allow things which are unaltered (the
existing legal system) to be observed. Legal process, legal
institutions and case outcomes will remain unchanged. In theory, their
functioning will be ‘revealed’; in practice, if critics of the system
are right, the main observable shift will be from a system which
cannot be understood because it cannot be seen, to a system which can
be seen – but still cannot be understood , because it borders on the
incomprehensible. This vista may in due course provide a basis for a
more-informed debate. Eventually the plans announced by Ms Harman
might become a prelude to the elaboration of constructive proposals.

Thereafter, perhaps work might start – on a problem which has
already been solved.

The seminal reforms, which everyone seeks, have already been
devised, agreed, announced, funded - and passed for implementation by
the Government in 2003. They still lie fallow.

These same reforms would already have introduced the long-overdue
new model for the family courts. These measures, endorsed by the legal
profession at senior level and approved by the Government, were killed
in Whitehall without Ministerial knowledge. The blueprint remains in
existence – fully articulated, fully-costed, fully-detailed and
fully-endorsed, with an agreed management team geared to deliver the
requisite procedural changes within nine months from start-up.

The suborning of this agreed professional reform is documented,
beyond gainsay, in the professional journals; in the broadsheets; in
Ministerial correspondence; in judicial pronouncements; in
departmental records, letters and email; and in Hansard. Perhaps Ms
Harman should be told.

DIVIDED RESPONSIBILITIES

How could a programme of orderly change supported by the High
Court judiciary and endorsed by the Government simply ‘go missing’ in
Whitehall? The June 2004 Green Paper, Parental Separation, expressly
announced these reforms and the underlying principles on which they
were based. Parliamentary time was set aside for the Children and
Adoption Bill 2005 to enact them.

But, without Ministers knowing, the Green Paper had been subverted
before it was published. The Children and Adoption Act 2006, designed
to deliver the new procedural machinery, was stillborn. The meaures it
was intended to enact had been killed by Whitehall officials three
years before.

The history of this misadventure is bound up in the fate of the
seminal NATC Early Interventions pilot project. On 8 October 2003 the
detailed proposals for this project were submitted to Whitehall, after
8 years in development, on a wave of unprecedented professional
support. As recited in Family Law 835 (November 2004) the project had
the written approval of the President, High Court Family judiciary,
the Family Law Bar Association, leading lawyers, parenting groups and
- vitally - the leading child development consultants. It was no
surprise that, in October ‘03, the NATC EI project received
Ministerial approval from the DCA’s Lord Filkin. The funds to
implement this flagship project were located in the DfES. EI was
passed to the DfES for implementation.

A DEPARTMENT OUT OF CONTROL ?

In accordance with usual timescales, the inaugural meeting of the
DfES Design Team to process the new measures happened some five months
later, on 17 March 2004. The Team’s chair was Mavis Maclean CBE. It
was at this stage that finely-honed NATC EI template should have been
translated into institutional practice.

But, by that stage, the EI reform had already been utterly
destroyed. Work on the EI project was stopped before it started. The
project was stifled pre-birth. Neither Mavis Maclean nor (with a
single exception) anyone else on the Government's Design Team had
significant knowledge of the NATC EI project. The Design Team was not
told about it. Scrutiny of the 17 March 2004 minutes confirms the NATC
Early Interventions project was not mentioned - then or later. Nor was
the NATC. Nor was the Early Interventions project. The EI project was
never discussed. The Design Team jettisoned 8 years of specialist
development work, without being aware of it, starting its labours
anew, from scratch, on a blank sheet of paper. On 19 April ‘04 it
emerged that the NATC EI documentation had been 'mislaid' by the DfES
before the Design Team met. On 29 April ‘04 it transpired that the EI
documentation was never read.

Appointments to the DfES Design Team had been on the basis of
hand-picked ignorance of the NATC EI principles. But, since EI was
then a dominant topic in family law, this meant that those on the DfES
Design Team knew little of the practicalities of family law
litigation. The Design Team's novices had their work cut out merely to
arrive at an approximate understanding of what the existing legal
system was – and, in due course, that was re-rolled out, instead, as
the finished project. This was the misbegotten Family Resolutions
project interposed for EI. Since this new Family Resolutions system
was all but an identical to the existing legal system, in proportion
as it was rolled out, Family Resolutions disappeared.

NEW ALCHEMY: GOLD INTO BASE METAL

Two officials were involved in the Whitehall process of
substitution, one from CAFCASS (a Mr Brian Kirby) and the other a DFES
"child protection" specialist (a Mr Bruce Clark). The latter had sole
charge of the EI project in Whitehall, within the DfES, during the
crucial period from October ‘03 to March ‘04 - when EI went in, and
Family Resolutions started to come out. This individual knew nothing
of significance about Private Law family law disputes. He assumed that
the law was what everyone would like it to be, which is the opposite
of what it actually is. To his DfES way of thinking (and he declined
advice) it followed that the framework which the NATC EI project would
have implemented was already in force. So the EI project was
superfluous. And, by the same token, the benefits of the EI project
could be announced (without the trouble of actually doing anything) as
ground-already-made-good: as a platform on which the other Green Paper
proposals could be built. These measures, similarly founded on
nothing, have also disappeared along with the DfES flagship of Family
Resolutions itself.

Mr Clark applied a well-worn Whitehall adage: ‘It is truth
universally acknowledged that the best way to take control of a
project is to get rid of anyone who knows anything about it’. In order
to achieve this own-goal, Mr Clark dispensed with the EI project
originators and anyone who had meaningful involvement with it. He set
up the Mavis Maclean's uncomprehending Design Team to have a go at
‘whatever the project was’ in this area. This is a direct quote. He
colluded with CAFCASS to swap EI for the Fam Res spoiler wanted by
CAFCASS. But ‘Family Resolutions’ was not a project. It existed merely
as a two-word name. It was a CAFCASS idea - to start thinking of an
idea - to do something. It is probable the Fam Res proposal had not
generated one side of A4 prior to its substitution as the official
'reform' project slated for national roll-out.

An awkward problem throughout the process of substitution, from
October ‘03 up until the project’s launch and incipient demise as
Family Resolutions in September ‘04, was that the approved project was
actually EI. For months the lead civil servant, repeatedly put to the
point, issued misstatements and false assurances to Ministers and
legal professionals that he was still progressing the measures and
principles in the NATC EI project. He said that the same project was
being carried forward: only the name (‘Family Resolutions’) had been
changed. These same assurances were relayed by Ministers to the House
and to the Press. Both were misled. The mistake was embodied in the
June 2004 Green Paper. Family Resolutions, which was never more than a
spoiler, duely sank without trace at the moment of launch. Mr Bruce
Clark (who seems to have previously indulged in a similar escapade
relating to another family law sector) was later subject to an
‘internal investigation’ by his Permanent Secretary, Sir David
Normington, who cleared him of all wrong-doing on 19 September
2005[1].

THE FUTURE ?

The upshot of these events is that both departments – the DCA and
the DfES – are now unsighted. When the DCA passed the NATC EI project
to the DfES in late 2003, it relinquished control over proposals to
remodel the family court system – so much so, that DCA officials have
yet to hear, for instance, that Family Resolutions has failed. For
three years now, the DCA has countered representations on the EI/Fam
Res fiasco with the response that it is not worth letting DCA
Ministers (for instance, Harriet Harman) know about it. Family court
reform is now a DfES responsibility.

But the DfES was never interested in the workings of the family
courts. It is not something it knows about. Its officials do know what
happened to Fam Res and EI, but to put things right would be to admit
that things have gone wrong. The upshot is a ‘closed-ranks’ DfES
strategy to prevent the restarting of useful work. Departmental
damage-limitation succeeded to the extent that the next DfES Minister
(there have been several) had no inkling that anything was wrong until
he first presented the Children and Adoption Bill to Parliament on 12
October 2005. He did not know that his Bill had been voided of
significance three years before by the DfES destruction of the EI
project.

Thereafter, Whitehall-funded research (RR720) on the history of
the Family Resolution debacle, conducted by the obliging Professor
Trinder, similarly contrived to turn a blind eye. The Constitutional
Affairs Committee, which deliberated on Section 8 reforms and the fate
of the NATC EI project from Oct ‘04 to February ‘05, was likewise
stage-managed by Whitehall staffers. The prime witness (the NATC) was
not called. The DfES enterprise to obliterate the prospect of useful
change in the family courts engineered by Mr Clark (perhaps inspired
principally by ignorance, albeit self imposed) has at this writing
been entirely successful.

The problem of ‘what to do next’ is rather delicate. The wheel,
after all, has already been invented. There is no pressing need to
waste decades, and billions of pounds, trying to re-invent family law
reform or tinker at the margins. A modest first step may be to put
Harriet Harman in the picture. Everything above will be news to her.

12 October 2006 - Consensus

This history of dire mismanagement is explained away on various
conflicting grounds. All are bogus. First, it is said that Fam Res is
an ‘adaptation’ of the NATC EI project. This is untrue. The two
projects are opposites. Second, that the NATC project was replaced
after a period of ‘consideration’. But the EI project was never
considered. The papers were merely thrown away. Third, that the EI
project was not designed for the British judicature. But it was
designed for, by and with, British legal experts and British judges.
Fourth, that the EI project never existed. Fifth, an odd red herring,
called the ‘Florida project’, is wheeled into uncertain play. But
there was no Florida project. And so on

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

MUST SEE!

parliament sq. peace camp - babs statement from inside holloway prison

brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog


BABS' STATEMENT FROM INSIDE HOLLOWAY PRISON
Parliament Square Peace Campaign Day 3736: AUGUST 25TH 2011





On Thursday 11th August, I was remanded to prison because they refused me access to a duty solicitor, the necessary disclosures and my own paperwork.

On Friday 12th August, I was 'sentenced' after they continued to deny me access to a duty solicitor, the necessary disclosures and my paperwork.

Hence the reason for 'Judge' Evans descending to the court cells with his scribes.

A barrister from Birnberg Peirce Solicitors turned up for reasons unknown on the Friday, to confirm they were not acting for me! They have also failed to hand over the necessary disclosures.

Such is an institutionally corrupt system.

The guy from Birnberg Peirce muttered something about their 'good reputation'. Clearly they are entirely ok with being responsible for their 'clients' being called 'criminals', however the 'problem' is clearly the consistent nature of our campaigning for an effective system of J.U.S.T.I.C.E. that actually protected the people..... EVERYWHERE.

If a 'lawyer' came on board doing justice, that would actually help to bring about the necessary change.

And all the 'lawyers' we have come across are just doing 'cab off the rank' misrepresentation, serving HM Government, end of. They just want to keep their heads down and hang out with their clique.

It becomes self evident that it is not a system of justice when your own 'lawyers' don't want you to tell the truth.

This latest car crash style of justice only reinforces to me how important it is what we do.

And it is only the 'do-ing' which can bring about change. Look at how many people who write about what is going on. But unless something is then done, to me what was written is meaningless.

I am using my time 'inside' productively and constructively. I am in a cell on the top floor with four other women. I am by a window looking out over a courtyard garden.

There are quite a few women in Holloway who have been imprisoned because of the riots.

These are historical times we live in.

It is eye opening to think that if you are a 'protester' in Libya, the UN and UK have no problem with / will give you a machine gun, rocket launcher, arrange arial bombing so that people can, in their own words, "take matters into their own hands".

I still think Brian showed everyone the best way of doing things. I miss him heaps and remember his final words "Babs, our work is not yet finished".

Much love, Babs xxxx






LOVE, PEACE, JUSTICE, FOR ALL






--- PLEASE JOIN ---

>> Facebook Group >>>>">The Offical Brian Haw and
>> Facebook Group >>>>">Parliament Square Peace Campaign
>> Facebook Group >>>>">Facebook Group

HABEUS CORPUS ISSUED - PARLIAMENT SQUARE

PARLIAMENT SQUARE - NO JUSTICE HERE

Photobucket
Brian Haw,RIP, started the Peace Campaign in Parliament Square in 2001,by literally camping and peacefully protesting on the small grassed area opposite Parliament.Ever since then the government has tried to remove it, by hook or crook. Camping on the grass section was ruled illegal eventually so the peaceful protest moved onto the pavement close by. This is totally legal - and the authorities dont like it! Now illegal arrests have been made on peaceful protesters - dubious solicitors getting involved, doing little for the persons arrested, who arent even allowed the due process of law....b.
========================================================

http://www.brianhaw.tv/index.php/blog/807-10082011-writ-for-habeas-corpus-to-european-court-of-human-rights

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

DAY 3721: WEDNESDAY AUGUST 10TH 2011.

The government appear hell bent on continuing to throw the rule of law and due process out of any window.

Photobucket

"They" do not want to face a jury and a massive payout in the High Court in civil claims over illegal searches (for example), which would also result in the return of campaign property that was controversially stolen on 23rd May 2006 from Parliament Square at a cost to the taxpayer of £111,000.

It is self evident that Matt Foot from Birnberg Peirce Solicitors had many months to go to court and resolve the fact that there was an absence of any court order so Babs and Brian could not be arrested during searches if they allegedly did not comply. Instead Birnberg Peirce have ignored instructions and done nothing, and so are also responsible for a - warrant - that will now have been issued.

None of it needed to happen.



BARBARA GRACE TUCKER - v - UNITED KINGDOM.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

Parliament are illegally using the legal system to try and destroy Brian Haw's 10 year 24/7 Parliament Square Peace Campaign which began on June 2nd 2001.

The 24/7 nature of our campaign has meant that the legal system that is illegally used by the state against us has been ineffective in protecting our right to peacefully campaign.

Barbara Tucker who has been a member of Brian Haw's Parliament Square Peace campaign since December 2005, has been subjected to numerous unlawful arrests and vexatious court hearings, all without due process.

The legal system has been used for all manner of politically motivated trumped up charges to prevent our campaign peacefully exercising our Article 10 & 11 rights.

On 22nd February 2006, the Metropolitan Police, Crown Prosecution Service and Courts illegally claimed it was a crime for Barbara Tucker to peacefully campaign with Brian Haw.

Barbara Tucker has been denied any opportunity to appeal this case, with an appeal in the High Court where legal aid was denied, heard in her absence, after she was not notified of the hearing.

The Criminal Cases Review Commission claim that the CPS and courts destroyed all records.

It is common-sense that it could never be a crime to campaign with Brian Haw, which it is acknowledged in The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) (17 March 2011)has been the case since December 2010.

Tucker v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] EWHC 3019 (Admin) (30 November 2007)

Confidential Minutes of a Meeting at New Scotland Yard on 19th May 2006, stated "both houses and black rod gave their full support for police actions".

Parliament ordered the Metropolitan Police to illegally remove Brian Haw's Parliament Square Peace Campaign on 23rd May 2006 under the cover of SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138.

However, there was no police power of seizure under SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138.

The legal system has refused to allow any challenge to SOCPA 2005 ss 132-138 showing that it is incompatible with Article 10 & 11 of the Human Rights Act, which would lead to a Declaration of Incompatibility.

However, when our campaign asked on 15th July 2008, in CO/11393/2007 for the return of campaign property that was stolen on 23rd May 2006, based on the illegal seizure, the police then began illegal searches under s17(1)e of the PACE Act on 29th July 2008, some seven years after the campaign began.

The Metropolitan Police face sixteen civil claims before a jury in the High Court, where on the balance of probabilities a jury would have to find that the searches began after our campaign sought a court order for the return of campaign property.

Therefore, unusually, not only all the searches would be found to be illegal but all the campaign property that was stolen on 23rd May 2006 would be returned.

Parliament and public authorities did not want this costly eventuality where they would also be found to have brought Parliament etc into serious disrepute.

The Metropolitan Police, Crown Prosecution Service and courts therefore then all ignored due process when they sought to illegally bring proceedings over searches back down into the Magistrates Court.

The Prime Minister David Cameron also publicly stated on Sky News in July 2009 that he would remove our campaign if he was elected Prime Minister.

This re-enforced the political nature of any and all illegal proceedings against our campaign.

The Mayor of London then obtained a High Court Injunction in 2011 (to remove our campaign to the pavement) when the Court of Appeal denied us any appeal in this country.

The courts had covered up three photographs from the London leg of the Tour De France in 2007, the December 9th 2010 student protests and December 31st 2010 New Years Eve which proved that we did not prevent anyone else from using Parliament Square.

The Mayor of London did not dispute that he also illegally used Maria Gallastegui as an agent provocateur (along with others) from a campaign called "Democracy Village/Peace Strike".

Westminster City Council who are responsible for the pavement in Parliament Square have now issued proceedings for another High Court injunction for an alleged unknown unreasonable obstruction of the highway, without providing any evidence of wrongdoing by our campaign.

All due process has been ignored by the state (MPS, CPS and City of Westminster Magistrates Court) involving cases over illegal searches while sidestepping the fact that the Metropolitan Police did not in fact have as they claimed to arrest us twice, (on 18th November 2009 & May 25th 2010), any court order that we comply with the searches.

Parliament has discriminated against a ten year 24/7 campaign and in so doing has effectively repeatedly kidnapped Barbara Tucker (who has been unlawfully arrested 41 times and) who is unable to get a fair hearing before any court in the country.

In the absence of the existence of any court order that Barbara Tucker comply with searches, the Crown Prosecution could not seek and City of Westminster Magistrates could not lawfully issue any warrant to make me appear before any court in the UK based on arrests that arose from a non existent court order.


Signed:


Date:

...namaste...b

Sunday, 28 August 2011

are u a walk-in?

Its all very well saying "enjoy it while your here" but...how can anyone enjoy it whilst half the worlds dying of starvation and in the other half traitors arrange wars whereby vulnerable children + women get maimed or murdered for absolutely no reason? THIS PLACE IS THE PITS!

ubj: Fwd: CHECK THIS OUT: TRUE WALK-IN DESCRIPTION

Dear Krystal, in my fifty six years of being involved in the "paranormal" I have had some pretty weird experiences that I have always found to be humorous. But regarding "my" being a "walk-in" I seriously doubt it. I'm just a very weird person who has enjoyed the use of what some would call "paranormal abilities." Geof Grey-Cobb wrote a book about me titled "Avatar", & the press would get carried away concerning my mediumship & demonology exploits. Ruth Mongomery swore that I was a "walk In" & Fletch ( Art Ford's spirit guide ) always referred to me as "that trouble making walk in," but they were as nutty as I am. I simply do not take this particular life in this one puny third dimension seriously, as "I KNOW" that I am (as we all are) a MULTIDIMENSIONAL ever evolving IMMORTAL entity (no not a soul) who is experiencing adventures in many unlimited realities, worlds, universes, parallel realities, probable realities, etcetera, and once created none of us can ever "die," but simply evolve ever onward in a non-ending ever expanding universe. THERE IS "NO" DEATH!!! I repeat: "THERE IS "NO" DEATH!!! There is simply "TRANSITION!" We all live within a thought form reality! As Jesus said in many ways: "AS YE "BELIEVE" SO ARE YE!" So dear lady, RELAX & enjoy the experience! I will be sending you various articles regarding "walk-ins" that I hope that you will enjoy. Great Blessings, Jonathon

Are You Really Someone Else?
Are You a "Walk-In"?
Credits: adapted from data provided by "Walk-Ins for Evolution" www.walk-ins. com and channeled information

http://www.healpast lives.com/ future/rule/ ruwalkin. htm

How to Know if You Are a Walk-In:

"A strong body and a good mind are terrible things to waste..." not to mention if that body and mind are also abundant in health, wealth, and a good position in life. This is the driving force behind the exchange of Souls that takes place when one has "walked out" of a body-mind and another has "walked in".

About "Walk-Ins": "Walking in" is a quick - but not always an easy - way for "advanced beings" to come "down to Earth". The Soul exchange between the "walk-in" and "walk-out" takes far less time than it does for most "walk-ins" to adjust to their new situation.

The "Forgetting" : Like all who come to Earth and incarnate into a physical body, the "walk-in" will "forget" - temporarily or permanently - about this exchange. Yet the effect on their lives will be totally unmistakable. This is because while the "walk-in" assumes the personality of the "walk-out" at the exchange, they immediately start to change so that they can go back to their "real" personality.

Why "Walking-in" can be Difficult: Typically, a Soul exchange is made by the "walk-in" taking on the lower three personality chakras of the "walk-out" while retaining their own upper four spiritual chakras. The lower chakras must remain connected to the earth at all times for the body to survive. Yet the upper chakras are a person's "divine core essence" which they carry betwen lives and bodies.

When "Walking-in" is a Serious Problem: If there is serious "incompatibility" between the upper and lower chakras after the "walk-in", this will manifest as numberless difficulties in an individual's life. So if you have experienced 7 or more out of 10 of the symptoms below in a period of 3 to 6 months, it is likely that you are a "walk-in". It is also likely that you may need some help getting clarity about your situation so that you can better adjust to your new life.

The Top Ten Signs that You May Be a Walk-In:

#1: EXTENDED PERIOD OF UNCONSCIOUSNESS WHILE ILL

Walking into a new body is as stressful for the "soul" walking in as it is for the "body" that is receiving that soul. To make it easier all the way around, many walk-ins occur while the body is "unconscious" for an extended period of time due to a serious illness or injury. This becomes easier because..

It is easier for the exchange to occur. The "walk-in" can take time to adjust to being in a body and the "walk-out" can say "goodbye" to their old life.
It is easier for the body-mind to harmonize and reintegrate the upper and lower chakras because "full time" can be devoted to this process.
It is easier for the family and friends of the person to accept the changes that follow when the individual "wakes up as a new person".

#2: SOME "MEMORY LOSS" OR EPISODES OF "LOST TIME"

When walk-ins occur in a perfectly healthy body, it is likely that periods of mental disorientation will happen. This manifests as total or partial memory loss and/or episodes of "lost time". This happens because the body-mind is fully engaged in processing the "walk-in" integration and literally has no resources to devote to "non-essential" functions like recording new memories.

#3: DRAMATIC CHANGE IN "BELIEF SYSTEMS"/RELIGION

One of the first noticeable changes in a "walk-in" is a dramatic change in their belief systems - especially as it pertains to religion. "Walk-out" atheists become "walk-in" believers. Or "walk-outs" from traditional sects turn suddenly to "new age" beliefs and practices. Or "walk-outs" who had disempowering attitudes (like sexism or racism) become "walk-ins" who "suddenly got religion".

#4: DRAMATIC SHIFT IN INTERESTS AND SPENDING TIME

More obvious to friends and family are dramatic shifts in the way the "walk-in" now spends his or her time compared to the "way they used to be". It is extremely likely that the "walk-in" will acquire new overwhelming and absorbing interests that never would have appealed to the "walk-out".

This is because most "walk-ins" have returned to Earth for a reason. Immediately after the exchange and for six months to a year afterward, they will find themselves absolutely compelled to take actions that "point them in the right direction" of accomplishing whatever their new mission is.

#5: INEXPLICABLE ACQUISITION OF TALENTS AND ABILITIES

The acquisition of "new interests" by the "walk-in" is directly related to their "discovering" whatever seems to be new "talents, skills, and abilities" for them. The truth is that the "walk-in" is just in the process of "awakening to those things which they already know, that they already can do".

#6: NEW APPROACH TO SOLVING UNSOLVABLE PROBLEMS

Since the "walk-ins" usually have a "higher" state of consciousness than the "walk-out", they are better able to handle the "problems" they have inherited from the "walk-out". The "walk-in" will suddenly have great clarity about how to resolve intractable issues that have eluded the "walk-out" for years.

#7: OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE YOU ARE "NOT YOURSELF"

Only the person who lives inside their own skin - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week - can ever truly know who they really are. Other people experience you like the proverbial "elephant in the dark" - they know only bits and pieces of you.

Only you know if you are - on the inside - the same as you have always been or if now you are "somehow different". If you are certain that somehow you have experienced a deep and profound change and are "no longer" yourself, then you are probably right. After all, who would know better than you?

#8: "SIGNIFICANT OTHERS" SAYING YOU ARE "DIFFERENT"

There is an old saying: "by their deeds shall ye know them". Sometimes the "walk-in" has so strongly identified with the "walk-out" that they have difficulty believing that they have really changed. This is almost always the case of you "not being able to see the forest for the trees".

If everyone around you says that you have changed... If everyone around you can date the change as in "you were this way before the date" and "you were that way after the date"... If everyone around you is very concerned that you have changed and MUST get help while you know that nothing is wrong with you... then - maybe, just maybe - they are right. Maybe others know you are a different person because you are. Maybe - just maybe - it is because you are a "walk-in".

#9: SUDDEN LEAVING OF LONG TERM MARRIAGES OR JOBS

Marriages usually end because one person believes that the other person is "not the person that they married". A spouse can often have the clearest perspective about your condition because they are the one who spend the most time with you. If a "walk-in" has happened, almost certainly a divorce will follow. This is because - at the highest level - the people are no longer in agreement to be together.

Ironically it is the spouse of the "walk-in" who usually is the one to call it quits. "Walk-ins" most often will try to honor the commitments made by the "walk-out". This is true of almost everything except for the "walk-out's" job/career/work. Usually the "walk-in" will immediately end their current job so that they can free themselves up to pursue their "new mission in life".

#10: RAPID SERIES OF CHALLENGING "LIFE" PROBLEMS

If it seems that "walking-in" is a great deal for the "walk-in" but not so great for the "walk-out", be sure to read this fine print.

The individual who agrees to "walk-out" usually does so because they no longer find life desirable. Perhaps the "walk-out" has lost a "loved one" and cannot get over their grief. Or maybe the "walk-out" is tired of living, has completed their contract, and no longer wishes to go on. Or possibly the "walk-out" is in a difficult health, wealth, or relationship situation and is not able to find their way out of it.

There is always "unfinished business" from the "walk-out" that the "walk-in" must complete before the "walk-in" is free to "live their own life". This usually manifests as a rapid series of challenging life problems to be resolved by the "walk-in".



Saturday, 27 August 2011

Friday, 26 August 2011

my videos - ENERGY LINES OF S UK - MICHAEL + MARY LINES

LAST NIGHTS SHOW - ROBERT GREEN , HOLLIE GREIG, EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11



Last nights Edge Media Show - Robert Green - Hollie Greig - 25 8 11 =

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF35AAC01128C697D

THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/kyv3fd

Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG_5nX1l-7k


HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL - TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw


D ICKE ON ALEX JONES - SCOTTISH ESTABLISHMENT PAEDOPHILES / HOLLIE GREIG
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE2C20AADE7B3F19A

HOLLIE GREIG - S USHER - P DROCKTON RADIO 27 4 2010
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1F9D1D38A45986E8


ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG - P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBA1F5B143DC56468

--------------------------------------------------------------

NORMAN SCARTH - UNFAIRLY IMPRISONED!

FROM "VICTIMS UNITE!" SITE

http://victims-unite.net/

86 YE OLD NORMAN SCARTH - JAILED FOR 6 MONTHS FOR RECORDING A COURT HEARING {HE IS DEAF + NEEDED IT FOR LATER + HAD MADE MANY SUCH RECORDINGS BEFORE WITH PERMISSION FROM THER "JUDGE", BUT ON THIS OCCASION, IT WASW FORGOTTEN}.

SUCH BARBARIC CRUELTY ON AN OLD SOLDIER WHO FOUGHT FOR A SYSTEM SUCH HAS BETRAYED HIM!!

HOW CAN THIS APPALLING JUDGE SLEEP AT NIGHT? PAEDOPHILES WHO RAPE CHILDREN GET NOTICIBLY LIGHTER SENTENCES!! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!! ************************************************


Judgment & Jury of over 2,100 Petition Signers in Scarth HMP Leeds Prison case

August 26, 2011

Sabine Kurjo McNeill Advocacy, Campaigning, Court hearing, Fundamental Rights Charter, Government, Human Rights Convention, News, Petitions, Publicity Child abuse, Crown Court, England, Habeas Corpus, judge, Kenneth Clarke, Leeds, Leeds Prison, London, Prison, Royal Courts of Justice, Stafford, Staffordshire, West Yorkshire, World War II 1 Comment

Yesterday’s hearing resulted in Norman having to wait until the appeal hearing on September 2nd.

Here’s the transcript of Justice Wyn Williams’ judgment.

Hence I’m updating the collection of comments on our petition Free WWII Veteran Norman Scarth from Leeds Prison.

Here are some gems for you:

1916. Until recently, we were in the dark; the justice is part of the crown. The question is WHAT CROWN! If this goes before the queen Elizabeth Bench tomorrow, this man WILL be freed. If this man goes before the crown the Corporation based in the city of London, they may let him free.

If you need help and would like to see how they are being dealt with send an email to dealwiththem (a) hmamail.com

Know who you are and what you are!

1934. A man worthy of the epiphet ‘your honour’ locked up by someone addressed as ‘your honour’ but not worthy of such – better and more truthful epiphet for the judge would be ‘your dishonour’.

1943. Release this old man, you contemptuous, heartless, disgusting psychophants No wonder the british legal system is ridiculed the world overl Mr Scarth has more backbone than the entire legal profession (sic).

1973. I am a survivor of the Staffordshire Pindown institutional child abuse, and have been repeatedly denied justice, Stafford Police dropped my case and my solicitor Richard Wise died in what I consider to be mysterious circumstances. The same judge who colluded with wicked men and persecuted Norman Scarth is the one who discredited Operation Ore. Norman is a very very kind old man, and very brave. Why is he in prison when none of the people who abused me are? This is just disgusting!

1977. This a disgrace to all right minded people. That this is allowed beggars belief. Release him right now! Here is a real cause for civil action.

1981. I’m so sorry that the country you fought for has betrayed you like this Norman. Is there hope for the future? With people like you there is.

Norman Scarth News as “tweets” from Twitter

August 25, 2011

Sabine Kurjo McNeill Campaigning, Contempt of Court, Court hearing,
=====================================================
NEWS RELEASE 20 August 2011
Cash for Kids – Especially Cute Nigerians

How Haringey Council makes Adoption easy by Stealing Children

“Adoption is easier than you think” is a poster you can see in this North London Borough that has turned child snatching into a business. Everybody profits, except parents and their children: social workers, lawyers, judges, property managers and foster carers. Information from Companies House shows the financial interests of everybody concerned.
Christopher Booker has written 10 articles[1] about this Nigerian family in The Telegraph, albeit anonymised due to a gagging order. These are meant to protect the children but actually protect criminal behaviour: The untold story of gagging orders[2] published by The Independent in May 2011 reveals that 69 relate to celebrities, while 264 concern children and young adults.
Ian Josephs, formerly local Councillor in Kent is now running language schools from Monaco and publishes Forced Adoption[3]. He says that the case of the Musa Family[4] is the worst he’s ever dealt with. He does not only help 3 – 4 cases a day, but has also watched how the situation worsened due to secrecy and gagging introduced in 1989, after forced adoptions got regulated in 1976. An online petition The Secrecy of Family Courts should be lifted NOW[5] attracted over 670 signatures and 8,900 page views since May 2011.
Parents are threatened with prison if they do break such orders and Bishop Gloria Musa and her husband Chiwar have spent 27 hours in prison already. Vicky Haigh[6] has spent 68 hours in prison, when she was eight months pregnant. Elizabeth Watson[7] has to show good reason for not being committed to prison on Monday 15 August 2011 because she sent emails about the wrong-doings that she discovered by Doncaster Council regarding about Vicky Haigh’s daughter. They can only be named thanks to John Hemming MP who removed the gag[8] on 26 April 2011.
However, once stolen, children’s identities are advertised freely for adoption such as on LondonKids[9], and once adopted, they cannot be returned to their biological parents.
What is very disturbing about child snatching is that judges seem to sanction what social workers are doing, while social workers and their legal teams “play court” and produce fake documentation that courts do not have records of.
Most evidence for such ways of operating is available about Doncaster Council. Haringey, however, have excelled in the fantasy with which they cover up allegations with more criminal behaviour: the parents were given invalid train tickets go get to their contact centres and their youngest baby was injected opium to prove that the mother takes drugs. This was meant to prove an initial allegation that a non-existing stepfather was supposed to have given the mother opium at the age of 15. The Council also invented the birth of another child which would have meant that the mother was pregnant twice in less than a year.
In Does this family have human rights?[10] Christopher Booker mentions a whistleblower who said that “social workers admitted that maybe they had made a mistake, and that the mother they had falsely accused was in fact devoted and blameless. But apparently, because of “press interest” in the case, the officials agreed that the Council could not afford the very damaging publicity which might follow, if the unhappy children were reunited with their parents. It was therefore vital that the Council should continue to justify its actions.”
Companies House shows that Judge Glenn Brasse, who is responsible for the Orders that allowed Police to take the first five children in April 2010 and the sixth baby right after birth, owns a property management company. Suzanne Moore who claims to be an “independent” social worker has 13 companies registered in her name, varying the name Time for Change. Rosita Moise who is a solicitor, is also Director of the Pepper Pot Day Centre and the Pepper Pot Club.
Another disturbing feature of the Musa saga is the connection with actress Michelle Collins who is alleged to have links with Hollywood where paedophilia is the “biggest problem” according to actor Corey Feldman[11]: I can tell you that the no 1 problem in Hollywood was, is and always will be paedophilia. It’s the big secret. Written evidence is available on request.
The question is whether the Court of Public Opinion can reunite what Haringey Council has torn apart. The website[12] that was established end of July has been viewed over 2,800 times, while a petition to send them home[13] was signed 53 times and viewed 790 times.
However, the Public Interest expressed in the petition to Free WWII veteran Norman Scarth from Leeds prison[14] has resulted in the judge to notify the Secretary of State The Rt Hon Kenneth Clarke QC MP who can overturn judgments on compassionate grounds.
Similarly, it is hoped that Judge Brasse’s secret “Care Orders” and “Emergency Protection Orders” will be overruled by The Secretary of State, if enough Public Interest can be demonstrated to return the children to their biological parents.

Sabine K McNeill"

PICTuRES OF ANY OF THE MUSA FAMILY CANNOT BE SHOWN BECAUSE OF COURT INJUNCTIONS. HOW RIDICULOUS IS THAT THAT PHOTOS CANT BE SHOWN OF VICTIMISED TORTURED PEOPLE BECAUSE IT WOULD EXPOSE THE CRIMES OF THE PEOPLE WHO VICTIMISED THEM thank you for your time.

...b.

Sunday, 21 August 2011

UFOS OF WW2 - FOO FIGHTERS

HOLLIE GREIG - 1ST TIME EVER MENTIONED ON INTERNET




autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG_5nX1l-7k


HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL - TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw

Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/kyv3fd

D ICKE ON ALEX JONES - SCOTTISH ESTABLISHMENT PAEDOPHILES / HOLLIE GREIG
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLE2C20AADE7B3F19A

HOLLIE GREIG - S USHER - P DROCKTON RADIO 27 4 2010
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1F9D1D38A45986E8

...many videos were deleted when my channell butlincat2 was shut down on june 30 2011 which i hope to replace asap...namaste...b.

THE DUBIOUS MICHELLE COLLINS

THIS DUBIOUS CHARACTER STARTED THE BALL ROLLING IN THE REMOVAL OF 6 CHILDREN FROM THE MUSA FAMILY - AND IS UNDER INVESTIGATION!!

http://www.barnardos.org.uk/who_we_are/in_your_region/bristo..l/bristol_about/bristol_local_..projects/bristol_michelle_coll..ins.htm

Michelle Collins | Actress | Barnardo's ambassador
www.barnardos.org.uk

‎---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: butlincat ..
Date: 21 August 2011 11:58
Subject: THE MUSA CASE = CONCERNING MICHELLE COLLINS
To: mail@thecommercialagency.c..o.uk
...Cc: a.lazzeri@the-sun.co.uk, ian@monaco.mc, Duncan Roads Nexus Magazine ....m.au>, ben.rankin@mirror.co.uk, community@mirror.co.uk, cservices@mgn.co.uk, editor@guardian.co.uk, editor@dailymail.co.uk, editor@express.co.uk, editor@gazettegroup.com, editor@independent.co.uk, editor@mailonsunday.co.uk,.. editor@observer.co.uk, editor@telegraph.co.uk, editor@thetimes.co.uk, expressletters@express.co...uk, feedback@mirror.co.uk, helen.foster.@bbc.co.uk, investigate@mirror.co.uk, letters@dailymail.co.uk, letters@guardian.co.uk, letters@independent.co.uk,.. letters@mailonsunday.co.uk.., letters@observer.co.uk, letters@thetimes.co.uk, liz.james@express.co.uk, mailbox@mirror.co.uk, mirrornews@mirror.co.uk, news@gazettegroup.com, news@theplymouthherald.co...uk, pete.saull@bbc.co.uk, scoops@sundaymirror.co.uk,.. stletters@telegraph.co.uk,.. telegraphenquiries@telegra..ph.c.o.uk, yoursay@theplymouthherald...co.uk

Please include any further information about your enquiry below (optional):

CONCERNING "MICHELLE COLLINS" - PLEASE FORWARD ASAP:

Hi my name is butlincat. I have been working on the Musa case - the shocking case of 6 illegally removed children from their family by Haringey council, and in the light of whats now appeared on the site mentioning Collins:
http://gloriamusa.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/11-08-..20-cash-for-kids.pdf
and her involvement at the outset of the case, which can only be described as "suspicious". I have been meaning write for some time, but now seems a good time as any. Please ask this character to send her side of the story regarding what has been written about her in documents that exist.
There is something very wrong here and it very much needs to be brought out into the open, {allegedly}.

very sincerely

Friday, 19 August 2011

GANGSTALKING IN AMERICA

From someone who is victimised by these rancid criminals:

"Gang Stalking: The New Policing in America
>

>
WELL THIS SAYS IT ALL ABOUT AMERICA, I'M WRITING A BOOK ABOUT IT
>
>
> Congressman Gonzalez To Help Pass A Bill To Investigate And Ban V2K Weapons
>
http://www.voicetoskull.com/news.htm
>
HOW ABOUT GANGSTALKING AND EVERY OTHER FORM OF EM SURVEILLANCE AND HARASSMENT
>
>
> How to Resist Federal Tyranny
>
http://www.nullifynow.com/
>
LONG OVERDUE!!
>
>
> British Parliament Demands Violent Repression of Youth Riots
>
http://mostlywater.org/british_parliament_demands_violent_repression_youth_riots
>
COMING TO A US CITY NEAR YOU NO DOUBT, NOW THEY JUST SURVEIL AND STALK EVERYTHING YOU DO
>
>
> Rumsfeld must face trial for torture, Court of Appeal rules
> Bush official does not have personal immunity for torture
>
http://www.impeachbush.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5477
>
WE CAN ONLY HOPE AND PRAY THESE CRIMINALS ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR EVERY FILTHY CRIME THEY HAVE AND ARE COMMITTING!
>
>
> Second Court Allows Damages Suit Against Rumsfeld Over Alleged Torture
>
http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2011/08/11/210513.htm
>
THIS IS WHAT WE NEED IF WE ARE EVER GOING TO STOP THE TORTURE GOING ON RIGHT HERE IN AMERICA TO TARGETED INDIVIDUALS
>
>
> Police May Be Tracking Your Cell Phone
>
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Government-Tracking-Investigated-127344973.html
>
YOU CAN BE SURE THEY ARE TRACKING YOUR CELL PHONE AND ANYTHING ELSE THEY CAN USE TO TRACK, HARASS, INTIMIDATE AND TERRORIZE THOSE SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEIR CRIMES. WE ARE ALL THAT IS LEFT TO STAND UP TO TYRANNY.
>
>
> 58% of every dollar spent in this country goes toward defense (Ray McGovern), now I have to ask are we more secure as a nation with that kind of defense spending. I'm not an expert on natl security but a country that goes bankrupt and defaults on it's debts, is that a secure country. Not to mention is turned into a Nazi Fascist police state with this kind of military spending to militarize our police, fire and nation. I don't think it's done much good for Britain either just look at their riots there, they can spy on every citizen but can't provide decent jobs or wages for their people, some security. Well I guess that's just our great NWO at work.
>
>
> ECHELON: AMERICA'S SECRET GLOBAL SURVEILLANCE NETWORK
> by Patrick S. Poole
>
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/echelon04.htm
>
WELL I HOPE THEY SPY ON EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS!! NOW THEY HAVE COMBINED THERE SPYING WITH THEIR NAZI COINTELPRO PROGRAMS AND TURNED ORGANIZED CRIME AGAINST THE AVERAGE AMERICAN, THE BEST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN IS FOR AMERICA TO GO BANKRUPT OR IF THE STATES QUIT SENDING ALL THEIR MONEY TO THESE CRIMINALS TO TURN THIS TECHNOLOGY AGAINST AMERICA AND THE WORLD JUST LIKE CANADA DOES NOW. WE CAN'T COUNT ON OUR REPRESENTATIVES TO PROTECT AMERICA OR HER CITIZENS ANYMORE."

....b.

Thursday, 18 August 2011

HOLLIE GREIG UPDATE - 18 8 11

UPDATE:T
THE HOLLIE GREIG CASE =
ROBERT GREEN at STONEHAVEN SHERIFF COURT 18th Aug 2011





Description:
HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/kyv3fd


ROBERT GREEN - P DROCKTON RADIO 21 6 2010:


UFO HIDES BEHIND CLOUD, LEVITATING GIRL, RUSSIA

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

JON KING ON LADY DI'S DEATH

LADY DI


Princess Diana Death: French Authorities May Arrest British Police, Conspiracy Re-ignited
French authorities may seek an international arrest warrant for two former police chiefs, who withheld a prophetic note in which Princess Diana seemingly predicted her assassination by car crash.[1] Something she stated on more than one occasion.
Former Scotland Yard chief Lord Condon and former Assistant Commissioner of Specialist Operations Sir David Veness, have been ordered to attend an interview in Paris to address why the note was under lock and key for 3 years following Diana's death. If they fail to attend they will be treated as suspects. The note remained hidden even when Lord Condon's successor Lord Stevens took over as Metropolitan Police Commissioner, suggesting the orders may have came from a higher authority.
The note was handed to the MET by Diana's Lawyer Lord Mishcon shortly after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash, which also claimed the lives of Diana's boyfriend Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul. It drew on a meeting between Diana and the law firm where she claimed her life was in danger; the record of the meeting in the form of a hand-written note says efforts would be made to get rid of her "…be it by some accident in her car such as pre-prepared brake failure or whatever."
Lord Condon and Sir Veness have publicly claimed that they made the decision not to release the document unless there was a suggestion that the crash was not an accident [2], but the French Judge Gerard Caddeo may see this as withholding the very evidence that does suggest it wasn't an accident. Under French law, "removing or concealing" evidence, which could "facilitate the discovery of a crime", is punishable by three to five years in jail or a fine.
Coinciding with the release of controversial Keith Allen documentary "Unlawful Killing" that suggests Diana was assassinated, this re-ignition of the case may open a whole new can of worms, right when the British establishment is being rocked by the phone hacking scandal.
It should be noted that this isn't the only document where Diana's death appears to be foreshadowed. As reported by The Telegraph another document was written way back in 1993!
A handwritten letter in which Diana, Princess of Wales claimed that the Prince of Wales was plotting to kill her so he could marry Tiggy Legge-Bourke, the former nanny to Princes William and Harry, has been shown at the inquest into her death.
That letter reads:
"This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous – my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. Camilla is nothing but a decoy, so we are all being used by the man in every sense of the word."
Even the most non-conspiratorial minded person has to scratch their head with intrigue that Diana feared for her death by orchestrated car crash as early as 1993, and then wound up dead in a car crash, while one of the notes that predicted this was subsequently hidden by police officers honored by the Queen, whose oh so Royal family would be prime suspects in an assassination of the Princess.
So far the official story is that the Mercedes-Benz carrying the victims collided with the 13th pillar of the Pont de l'Alma tunnel, because driver Henri-Paul was intoxicated with alcohol, anti-depressants and possibly carbon monoxide, causing him to lose control of the wheel. However video surveillance at the hotel that evening show an upright Paul who appears to be in full control of his faculties. Moments before entering the vehicle he can be seen quite happily tying his shoe laces with no obvious impairment.
The media frenzy that called Henri "drunk as a pig" [3], was well underway before samples had even been presented [4], suggesting the narrative was to some degree pre-arranged or grossly speculative. Independent forensic pathologists have reviewed the toxicology reports and concluded that the blood samples were not stored at the correct temperatures, meaning higher levels of alcohol would have been recorded due to decomposition of the blood.[5] Furthermore it was claimed that Henri-Paul had over 20% carbon monoxide blood content, which would cause any regular person severe head-aches and a lack of coordination, which again is refuted by the CCTV evidence of Paul in the hotel lobby.
No acceptable explanation has been given for the presence of Carbon Monoxide. Initial reports claim it came from the vehicles airbags, but this was later ruled out. It seems absurd that a life saving system could release a toxic gas. It quite logically has been suggested that this intoxication came post-crash from exhaust fumes, but Henri was supposed to have died on impact rendering him unable to breath in any of the fumes. Smoking was also blamed, but Toxicologist Professor Robert Forrest ultimately had to concede that "It's either conspiracy or cock-up."[6] "…he could not find any logical explanation for the findings."
A thorough investigation needs to follow all leads and motives. The Henri-Paul claim is flimsy, so it would be worth following up on Diana's cries for help, specifically the idea that she was to be murdered by "pre-prepared brake failure". Such a technique for carrying out assassinations does purportedly exist within the secret services of the world. According to author Jon King it's called the "Boston Breaks" method and involves installing hardware within a vehicle, which allows the assassination team to jam the steering column and braking functions remotely, causing the car to hurtle out of control, unable to break or steer. This is dealt with in his book Diana: The Evidence
Also in the book The Feathermen by former SAS demolition expert and famous British explorer Sir Ranulph Fiennes, he recounts the alleged assassination of Major Michael Marman via this very method.
The Clinic had been watching Major Michael Marman, and had determined that he frequently drove along the A303 arterial road, in Wiltshire, south-west England, on personal business. While doing this, he was habitually alone, and the fact that his vehicle was a relatively flimsy Citroen 2CV meant that a crash was the perfect method to kill him. Nevertheless, the Clinic dared not tamper with Marman's car or deploy a driver to ram him off the road, since their contractual obligation to make the death appear accidental would almost certainly come unstuck under the slightest police investigation. They therefore decided to use a proxy: an apparently random driver who would unknowingly become the Clinic's untraceable instrument of execution, by colliding with Marman.
Through relatively simple research, they discovered a businessman whose offices were in Plymouth and London, and who regularly drove between the two along the A303 road. This was Air Marshal (ret'd) Sir Peter Horsley, former equerry to the Duke of Edinburgh and to the Queen, and ex-Commander in Chief of Britain's atomic strike force, who now worked for an engineering firm, ML Holdings. Study and surveillance showed that Sir Peter was due to drive from London to Plymouth for a board meeting on 11 November 1986, at a time which would mean he would pass Major Marman in the opposite direction along the length of the A303. The Clinic then entered Horsely's garage during the night of 10-11 November, and, over an eight-hour period, fitted a 'parasite' braking system in the cavities of his BMW, in such a way that it couldn't be seen on immediate inspection. This radio-controlled system was powered by a scuba-diving cylinder of compressed air, which would allow each of the car's brakes to be applied separately, without the control of the driver.
The next day, having practised their technique for weeks with stock cars and models, two of the Clinic members shadowed Horsely, while keeping in radio communication with a second Clinic team, shadowing Marman. As Marman's 2CV and Horsely's BMW approached each other along the A303, the parasite braking system was applied, and Horsely lost control of his vehicle, which was steered across the central reservation and into Marman's path. the ensuing collision killed Marman outright, and severely injured Horsely. Horsely was initially under suspicion of reckless driving, but fortunately had a witness who had been driving behind him, who testified that he had seen a puff of smoke emerge from the rear of Horsely's car immediately before he lost control: at inquest, the local coroner said the accident would remain unexplained. The more definitely so, since the Clinic's parasite brake-system had been secretly removed after the accident while the BMW was impounded at the police garage facility. The Feather Men, who failed to prevent this assassination, ultimately learned exactly how this scenario unfolded when they captured and interrogated the Clinic's chief assassin.
In his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the pillar.
Horsley wrote:
"Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split-second the driver's horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream."
It's worth noting the Mercedes carrying Diana had previously been stolen. The Daily Mail notes:
It had been stolen several months before the accident and there are those who speculate that this might have been an opportunity to tamper with the car.
The general public are familiar with Prince Charles' affair with Camilla, but Diana's 1993 letter claims he wanted her dead to pursue a marriage with Tiggy Legge-Bourke (the Prince's nanny), not Camilla. In fact Camilla herself nearly died in a car accident shortly before Diana's death [7], and as the letter states: "Camilla is nothing more than a decoy."
Lets suppose the massive coincidences here are simply that, coincidences, and Diana's death was just a tragic accident. We still have two documents where Diana feared for her death via car crash. Did Charles and/or the perpetrators strike it lucky; did fate deliver a dead Diana in the exact manner they wanted?
Or are we just being silly conspiracy theorists? If that's the case, the alternative is to believe that Diana was a lying bitch….
http://wideshut.co.uk/princess-diana-death-french-authorities-may-arrest-british-police-conspiracy-re-ignited/
..

THE CORRUPTION OF HARINGEY COUNCIL

From:
To: rosita.moise@haringey.gov.uk; alison.oates@haringey.gov.uk; jonquil.houghton@creighton.co.uk; prfd.familyhighcourt@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; prfd.publiclaw@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; prfd.familygeneralenquiries@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; douglas.taylor@creighton.co.uk; amanda.el-guerissy@creighton.co.uk
Subject: CASE NO FD10C00195
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:32:45 +0000

To Rosita Moise
Solicitor
London Borough of Haringey

Dear Ms Moise

We oppose your application into the court , We have apply for habeas corpus since 21 July 2011 because we have not seen our daughter for 1 year and there are rumours that london borough of are trafficking there children in care abroad for sexual exploitation and they are been sold abroad:
if you don't produce our children in court on 17 Aug 2011 we are taking an Action against you and London Borough of Haringey For

1.Kidnap.
2.Conspiracy to Kidnap.
3.Child Abduction .
4.Fabricating of Court Document and deceiving the court.
5. Abuse of court process .
6. All the EPO and ICO was obtain by fraud because its false allegation and fabricated document by rosita moise.

What you have done to our family is inhuman and a gross violation and a breach of our human right.

You are Keeping our children against our will Return our children back to us.

We have never consented to ant EPO or ICO.


Please Find attach Application for Habeas Corpus Summited to the court on the 21 July 2011.

Yours sincerely

======================================================================

PRIVATE PROSECUTION SERVICE
www.prosecutionservice.org
PRESS RELEASE Monday 8 August 2011
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION:
LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY CHILDREN'S SERVICES
PUBLIC CALL FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
The Private Prosecution Service is involved in specific criminal investigations
regarding London Borough of Haringey Children's Services Department and
Haringey Legal Dept and others involving Negligence, MisFeasance,
NonFeasance, MalFeasance, Malpractice, Maladministration, Breach
of Position in public office, Human Right breaches, Fraud, Forgery, Threats,
Harassment, Coercing Children against their will, Conspiring to and Perverting
the Course of Justice, the issue of unlawful court orders resulting in
the unlawful holding of children (AKA Kidnap by fraud), witness intimidation
and other crimes for which we have evidence and we intend to prosecute. We
are also informed by a non UK Police force of London Borough of Haringey's
involvement in trafficking Non UK National Children abroad with various
offences attending to that.
Please note: Although these matters may involve Family Law Proceedings
the PPS is focused on crimes and as such these matters are subject to the
framework of criminal law and not that of Private Family Law. Crime is a
public not a private matter and the effect of this is that victims and witnesses
who wish to come forward are not gagged from discussing these matters. It
is also a fact in law that interference with a criminal investigation or of victims
or witnesses is in itself a crime and we would wish to hear if anyone attempts
to so interfere with any assistance or information that anyone may wish to
provide in these matters. You and they need to know that they have
protection under the law.
THE PPS IS AN INDEPENDENT NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION.
If you have any information contact us in confidence on
Haringey@prosecutionservice.org or 0203 318 2582 Extn 473
BACKGROUND BRIEF ON CRIME IN FAMILY LAW:
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/gzzome
Director of Prosecutions - PRIVATE PROSECUTION SERVICE
Press Enquiries:
Email: Press@prosecutionservice.org or Tel: 0203-318 2582 Extn 473
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVATE PROSECUTION SERVICE
www.prosecutionservice.org
CAN YOU HELP?
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION:
LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY CHILDREN'S SERVICES
PUBLIC CALL FOR VICTIMS AND WITNESSES
The Private Prosecution Service is involved in specific criminal investigations
regarding London Borough of Haringey Children's Services Department,
Haringey Legal Dept and others involving Negligence, MisFeasance,
NonFeasance, MalFeasance, Malpractice, Maladministration, Breach
of Position in public office, Human Right breaches, Fraud, Forgery, Threats,
Harassment, Coercing Children against their will, Conspiring to and Perverting
the Course of Justice, the issue of unlawful court orders resulting in
the unlawful holding of children (AKA Kidnap by fraud), witness intimidation
and other crimes for which we have evidence and we intend to prosecute. We
are also informed by a non UK Police force of London Borough of Haringey's
involvement in trafficking Non UK National Children abroad with various
offences attending to that.
Please note: Although these matters may involve Family Law Proceedings
the PPS is focused on crimes and as such these matters are subject to the
framework of criminal law and not that of Private Family Law. Crime is a
Public Not a private matter. The effect of this is that victims and witnesses
who wish to come forward are not gagged from discussing these matters. It
is also a fact in law that interference with a criminal investigation or of victims
or witnesses is in itself a crime and we would wish to hear if anyone
attempts to so interfere with any assistance or information that anyone may
wish to provide in these matters. You and they need to know that they have
protection under the law.
THE PPS IS AN INDEPENDENT NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION.
If you have any information contact us in confidence on
Haringey@prosecutionservice.org or call 0203 318 2582 Extn 473
BACKGROUND BRIEF ON CRIME IN FAMILY LAW:
http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/gzzome
Director of Prosecutions - PRIVATE PROSECUTION SERVICE
Issue date: 08 August 2011
Press Enquiries: Email: Press@prosecutionservice.org or Tel: 0203-318 2582 Extn 473
===========================================================================
In April 2010 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family home in Haringey North London and removed the Musa's 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on dubious, untrue allegations made by certain people at Haringey council, all of which have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten, etc.
Regarding the child trafficking allegation a DNA test proved the opposite that that the children were indeed the Musas, and the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally false allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation that was made was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker - a prostitute - who plied her trade in front of her congregation {she is an ordained bishop in the African Evangelical church} and also in front of her children. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children were beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegation.
During the time the children were removed the eldest, now 10 year old Favour Musa, complained of being "inappropriatly touched" - sexually molested in other words - by the teenage habitee of the foster home she was placed in. Also she had contracted scabies whilst at this home. Ever since this child complained of her harrassment she has not been seen by any family member - it is not known whether she is alive or dead, is even in this country and the council refuse to relate anything about the child when the parents enquire after her. She has simplky vanished and she has not been seen by anybody for over 10 months since she made the allegation of sexual molestation by the teenage family member she was placed in the home of.
Recently on the 27th June 2011 the Musas took their baby to St. Thonas's hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever - a temperature. This was enough for Haringey council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming it had been administered hard drugs, ewven though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediatly and she has been removed from the Musa family, even though the reasons for the baby's removal are totally spurious and false and unfactual. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Haringey councils fake allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. In other words, the baby will be removed from the family AGAIN on a totally false allegation.
Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case, from outright witness intimidation at least 5 people I am familiar with to police conducting raids with no warrant or legal documentation and without neccassary witnesses required by British law. The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing is ever done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and even financial hardship to this family who seemed to have been targetted by what can only be described as criminals working within Haringey council and connected to it. However, all contact visits with the children have now stopped as of approx. 6 weeks ago - which is against the court orders for the family, against basic Human Rights and British law, and against the so-called "Childrens Act" touted by the government. I have written over 30 emails and letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called "authority figures" {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, even when trying to inform them of a 9 year old girl {at the time} being sexually molested.
These are the basic facts of this outrageous case but many more crimes and irregularities exist - the latest of which is Gloria Musa being told of death threats to them by a council worker, and today receiving a message from Mr. Musa saying there is to be a hearing at the high court on July 21, when the Musa parents could very well be imprisoned due to an injunction being breached.
This is a true sworn statement and any further details can be given on request.

Since this article was written the Musas baby "Queen Elizabeth" has indeed had an Interim Care Order served upon her, [after an initial Emergency Protection Order {EPO}] and has been taken and placed into care, the initial removal being on the 28th June 2011. They have not seen the baby since then..The ICO has been issued by the High Court under the judgement of Judge Mostyn and needs to be investigated as to the reasons why. The Musa parents have at no time ever administered any drugs that are illegal to the baby, and have not even seen any official medical report from anybody. The Musa parents incidentally do not even drink alcohol, or of course take any medication that is not legal or not officially prescribed by a certified registered doctorand never have at any time in the past. The allegation by the council, in the early stages of this case, that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager is completely untrue. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children.
UPDATE: On the 11 Aug 2011 an eviction order was upheld, thus rendering the family homeless whenever the bailiffs decide to turn up to evict the Musas. The court hearing had highly dubious elements in it, the judge being MORLEY, it being changed instantly from an open hearing to a private one. Other irregularities occurred at this hearing, MORLEY being perhaps the most arrogant character ive ever met in my life. This character needs invcestigating VERY MUCH!!



my Nibiru - KEVIN COYNE video

my reuploads THE ATOBIOGRAPHY OF AL BIELEK 2008 - x12 - 2008

Monday, 15 August 2011

8.14.11 - Nibiru, ELENIN, Neumeyer Station, SOHO/STEREO & more!

NAZI GOLD AND THE BUSH FAMILY

The Nazis extracted the fillings of its victims after being
informed by Degussa that the company could refine it
into marketable gold bullion. Degussa was awarded an
exclusive contract with the Nazis to refine all gold. The
company was also joint owners with I.G. Farben of
Degesch, a firm that produced Zyklon-B cyanide tablets
used in the gas chambers. Due to the hoard of gold
fillings stacking up at Auschweitz, Degussa built a
smelter there. The bullion was then shipped back to
Berlin and commingled with the Nazis gold stash.
Undoubtedly some of it made its way back to the banker
in charge of United Steel Works, Prescott Bush.
Gold Fillings, Auschwitz &
George Bush
Page 2 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
1/16/03
From the Streets of Little Beirut
By Glen Yeadon
There were little warning signs but few were paying
attention when George Bush the poppy ran for president
in 1988 and 1992. First during the campaign it surfaced
that one of his campaign staffers was a distributor of pro-
Nazi propaganda. Before the ink was dry on the
individual’s resignation, further revelations showed there
were in fact a number of ex-Nazis on Bush’s campaign
staff including Laszlo Pastor and Yaroslav Stetsko. Pastor
was a member of the Hungarian Arrow Cross during
WWII and served as an envoy to Germany. The Arrow
Cross was known to be excessively brutal even to their
Nazi allies. Stetsko served as the prime minister of the
short lived Ukrainian puppet government. During the
short reign of this puppet regime over 100,000 Jews were
slaughtered in Lvov. George Bush’s insensitivity towards
victims of the holocaust is underlined by his employment
of Fred Malek, a well-known collaborator with former
Nazis in both his presidential campaigns.
Upon winning the presidential race, George Bush, the
poppy placed his assets in a blind trust headed by his
close friend William Stamps Farish III. That appointment
should have triggered alarm bells that something very
Page 3 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
dark and sinister is buried in the Bush family’s past. His
grandfather William Stamps Farish sold the Japanese the
gasoline used in the attack on Pearl Harbor. Likewise, the
elder Farish supplied Hitler’s war machine with oil and
tetraethyl lead. George Bush’s father, Prescott was close
friends with the elder Farish and remained so even after
the elder’s testimony before congress provoked Harry
Truman to cry out "This is Treason."
In fact, during the war, Prescott had three companies
seized from him for trading with the Nazis. To
understand the web of intrigue and follow the money
from the Holocaust to the Bush family we need to start
with the period immediately surrounding WWI. By 1916
August Thyssen could see that Germany had already lost
the Great War and he needed to protect his fortune. His
eldest son had been groomed to run the family steel
business in the Ruhr. His second son Heinrich discreetly
changed his citizenship from German to Hungarian and
married the Hungarian aristocrat Baroness Margrit
Bornemisza de Kaszon. Near the end of the war August
Thyssen opened the Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart in
Rotterdam. Holland was a neutral country during the war
and the new bank would serve as the perfect location to
launder funds from the Thyssen Bank in Berlin and
protect his fortune from allied financial demands. At the
end of the war Heinrich now going by the name of Baron
Thyssen Bornemisza de Kaszon moved to Rotterdam and
became the principal owner of the Bank voor Handel en
Scheepvaart. All that remained to be done in August
Thyseen’s plan was to set up an American Bank.
Page 4 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
In 1922, Averell Harriman traveled to Germany to set up
a branch of W.A. Harriman in Berlin. Harriman had hired
George Herbert Walker, George Bush’s grandfather to
run both the New York and Berlin branches of his
expanding investment firm. During his stay in Germany
Harriman had met the Thyseen family and agreed to help
the Thyssen’s set up an American bank.
In 1923, Germany was in economic shambles and
Thyssen met with his friend General Ludendorff, who
advised him that Germany’s hope lied with Hitler and the
Nazi Party. Thyssen soon became a financial backer of
the Nazis and Hitler.
Early in 1924, Hendrick J. Kouwenhoven, the managing
director of Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart, traveled to
New York. Meeting with Walker and the Harriman
brothers, they founded the Union Banking Corporation.
In 1926, August Thyssen died the eldest son Fritz
expanded the Thyssen empire by creating United Steel
Works. Thyssen also brought Fredich Flick on board. The
Thyssen-Flick union was designed to suppress the union
movement. As a result of the merger of Thyssen and
Flick, George Walker hired his son in law Prescott Bush
to manage the United Steel Works account. One division
of United Steel Works consisted of both Consolidated
Silesian Steel Corporation and the Upper Silesian Coal
and Steel Company. Both were located in the mineral
rich Silesian area of Poland. The arrangement was
extremely profitable for all four men: Thyssen, Flick,
Walker and Bush until the depression started in 1929.
Congressional investigations after the war showed that
Page 5 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
United Steel had supplied 50.8 percent of the pig iron in
Nazi Germany and likewise was a major supplier of all
other ferrous based metal products needed by Hitler’s
war machine. Hence, one of the largest munitions makers
in Nazi Germany was funded by Prescott Bush, the father
and grandfather of two future US Presidents.
Due to the depression, Harriman merged with Brown
forming the Brown Brothers and Harriman firm.
Internally the stock of Consolidated Silesian Steel
Company was held by the Harriman 15 Corporation
formed by Harriman and Bush. Two thirds of the stock
was owned by Flick. By 1934, with Hitler in solid control
of Germany the profits from the Thyssen-Flick union
soared to over a hundred million. Both Union Bank and
the Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart were overflowing
with money. Prescott Bush became managing director of
Union Bank and took over the day-to-day operations of
the German plan.
In 1939, the Nazis invaded Poland ending a dispute over
taxes between Consolidated and the Polish government.
The Nazis original plan was to replace the workers in
Polish factories with Soviet prisoners. However, that
portion of the Hitler-Stalin agreement was never
implemented. Consolidated Silesian Steel Corporation
was located near the Polish town of Oswiecim. When the
plan to use Soviet prisoners as forced labor fell through,
the Nazis began shipping Jews, communists, gypsies and
other minority populations to the camp the Nazis had set
up. This was the beginning of Auschwitz. The reason
Auschwitz was located there was because of the
Page 6 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
abundant supplies of coal which could be processed into
aviation fuel. I.G. Farben soon built a plant near
Auschwitz to take advantage of not only of the nearby
coal deposits but also of the slave labor supply available
at Auschwitz. According to a Dutch intelligence agent,
Prescott Bush managed a portion of the slave labor force
in Poland.
Thyssen and Flick sold Consolidated Steel to UBC.
Under the complete control of Harriman and Bush’s
management, the company became Silesian American
Corporation, which became part of UBC and Harriman's
portfolio of 15 corporations. As the 1930s progressed and
it became clearer that war was imminent, Bush and
Harriman hired the Dulles brothers to conceal the Nazi
money and ownership in Union Bank. In concealing the
involvement of the Nazis in Union Bank, Prescott Bush
and Harriman undoubtedly knew that they were already
engaged in an activity that was probably illegal and
certainly not in the best of interests of their country. Once
war broke out however, Bush’s activities on the behalf of
the Nazis through Union Banking became tantamount to
treason.
The reader should understand that the concealing of
Nazis assets located in the United States through a maze
of corporate shells often based in Switzerland was an
integral part of the German battle plan. In fact, the Nazi
had a word for it, tarnung or to camouflage. The primary
aim of these concealed Nazi corporations was to wage
economic warfare by creating production bottlenecks for
their adversary. The reader should also be aware that two
Page 7 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
Americans were present during the secret meeting of the
German elite that brought Hitler to power. Those two
Americans were John Foster and Allen Dulles.
Two of the directors of Union Banking Groninger and
Kouwenhoven, were Nazi directors of the Bank voor
Handel en Scheepvaart, formerly the von Heydt Bank.
Von Heydt was also a Nazi and has been identified as the
intermediary between the Guaranty Trust and Adolf
Hitler. Both Groninger and Kouwenhoven contributed
lavishly to Himmler’s Circle of Friends. There were over
forty firms around Auschwitz using slave labor from the
death camp. Soon the Nazis had a massive store of gold
from dental fillings, glasses and jewelry. The Nazis
extracted the fillings of its victims after being informed
by Degussa that the company could refine it into
marketable gold bullion. Degussa was awarded an
exclusive contract with the Nazis to refine all gold. The
company was also joint owners with I.G. Farben of
Degesch, a firm that produced Zyklon-B cyanide tablets
used in the gas chambers. Due to the hoard of gold
fillings stacking up at Auschweitz, Degussa built a
smelter there. The bullion was then shipped back to
Berlin and commingled with the Nazis gold stash.
Undoubtedly some of it made its way back to the banker
in charge of United Steel Works, Prescott Bush.
On October 20, 1942 the United States government
seized Union Banking under the Trading with the Enemy
Act. During that summer, The New York Tribune had
exposed Bush and Thyssen whom it called Hitler’s
Angel. Union Bank’s books revealed a myriad of Nazi
Page 8 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
money and holding companies. Officials realized they
had only scratched the tip of the iceberg. On November
17, 1942, the government seized Silesian American
Corporation and placed its operation under the
Government Alien Property custodian office.
Following the war, authorities seeking to locate the
Dutch Royal family’s jewelry discovered the transaction
papers of the Silesian American Corporation in the books
of Bank voor Handel en Scheepvaart. The bank manager,
H.J. Kounhoven came under intense scrutiny and was
shocked by the discovery. Soon Kounhoven traveled to
New York to inform Prescott Bush. Dutch authorities
date the meeting as soon after Christmas 1947. Two
weeks later, the otherwise healthy Dutch banker died of a
heart attack. Coincidentally, this was the method of
choice of the Gehlen network for liquidating people. The
Nazis had perfected a method of inducing heart attacks
that autopsies could not detect.
On February 8, 1951, Thyssen died in Argentina.
Following his death, the Alien Property Custodian
released the assets of the Union Banking Corporation to
Brown Brothers Harriman. The remaining shareholders
quietly cashed in their remaining shares. Prescott Bush
received $1.5 million for his share in Union Banking’s
blood money.
This brief article has only scratched the surface of the
sordid association of Prescott Bush with the Nazis as he
had yet a third company seized from him during the war.
In his first run for senator, Prescott was defeated after his
Page 9 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
position within the eugenics movement was disclosed.
George the poppy has followed in his father’s footsteps
and retained many of the same family connections with
the Nazis. For instance, as chairman of the Republican
Party he presided over the formation of the Ethnic
Heritage groups of the Republican Party. This was a
reward for the Nazi quislings from Eastern Europe for
helping in the election of Nixon as president. When two
or more ethnic groups were vying for control over a
particular group invariably the group with close ties to
the Nazis won out. George also shows the same intense
interest in population control. Perhaps it was for his
beliefs in eugenics, George appointed Draper as his
expert on population. Or perhaps it was more of a reward
for past services rendered by Draper to the Bush family.
Draper was the former general placed in control of the
military government‘s economic division after the war.
Draper was a rabid racist and member of the Eugenics
Society. He was also a former employee of Dillion and
Reed, the large Wall Street brokerage house that floated
the largest German bond offerings including one for
United Steel Works. In his position as economic czar of
Germany, he stopped the dismantling of an I.G. Farben
plant and was in the ideal slot to protect his former
clients that armed Hitler, including Bush.
The same close associations are apparent with Bush
junior. One interesting pattern in international relations is
ready observed that the Israeli government moves to the
hard right whenever a Bush is in the Oval Office.
Considering, Israel has one of the best intelligence
agencies in the world and a perhaps the most extensive
Page 10 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
data base on the holocaust, could the Israeli hard-liners
be blackmailing the Bushes? Do they have a smoking
gun that would at once end the political aspirations of the
entire Bush clan as well as place the family wealth at risk
for damages suffered during the Holocaust? One
researcher already says the family wealth is at risk in
such suits; the ties are that strong.
Any reasonable person understands that the tragedy of
9-11 was allowed to happen. Only the White House can
order the interceptors to stand down, once an aircraft
deviates from its flight plan or contact is lost. Within 30
minutes of the time the golfer’s plane that decompressed
failed to follow directions from the control tower a
fighter was alongside and shadowed the plane until it ran
out of fuel and crashed in the midwest. The story that no
fighters were available is simply a lot of bullshit. There
are probably no less than a dozen or more airports within
range of New York and Washington DC with fighter
squadrons on standby. Yet, Bush wants us to believe that
the entire East Coast was left unprotected with no
fighters to provide air cover including the restricted
airspace over the White House. The 9-11 tragedy was the
Reichstag fire and the so-call Patriot Act, the enabling act
for another fascist government.
With American blood about to stain the sands of the
Mideast why hasn’t the media focused on the merchant
of death, who armed Saddam? They would need to look
no further than George Bush, the poppy and Vice
President Dick Cheney. Poppy Bush is rubbing his hands
with glee counting potential profits for his Carlyle Group.
Page 11 of 11
Untitled 3 24 2006 5 12 21 25 1:25 AM
The group holds stocks in defense industries that armed
Saddam during the Reagan years and provided arms for
the US military. This is the way the Bush family makes it
money. Just ask Prescott. It didn’t take Dick long to learn
that secret. After the first Bush administration in which
Cheney was the head of defense, he became head of
Halliburton.While at Halliburton, Dick sold hundred of
millions of dollars worth of dual use equipment to Iraq.
Stand behind the young soldiers and wave a flag for
them, as they are mere canon fodder for this fascist
clique. Don’t wave a flag for the most corrupt
administration in the history of the country that’s hellbent
on installing a fascist regime beholding to no one
other than corporate interests.
Your freedom depends on it.