I stand accused of harassing two people and the prosecution will be relying on 4 witness statements given to the police by 4 people who all allege harassment from myself after I supposedly repeatedly tried contacting them.
Strange then that I have never so much as spoken to two of them although one of them did try to contact me, I have messaged another JUST THE ONCE with no reply, to ask for an interview and was very ...polite in doing so, and the fourth has contacted me two or three times in an extremely abusive manner demanding that I speak to him.
Therefore, I cannot possibly get a fair trial, which is obviously the whole idea and as such I would ask that you ALL sign and share the petition found at the following link, which has been created on my behalf
"MR. CHRISTOPHER SPIVEY OF ROCHFORD, ESSEX, HAS BEEN ACCUSED OF HARASSMENT BY FOUR PEOPLE AND STANDS TRIAL ON THE BASIS OF THIS ACCUSATION ON THE 30TH JULY 2015. DISTRICT JUDGE WOOLLARD HAS REFUSED MR. SPIVEY THE RIGHT TO FACE HIS ACCUSERS IN A COURT OF LAW AND THUS ALLOW HIS LEGAL DEFENCE TO CROSS- EXAMINE THEM. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE RIGHT OF EVERY PERSON UNDER THE ENGLISH JUSTICE SYSTEM TO FACE HIS OR HER ACCUSER. JUDGE WOOLLARD HAS ABUSED HIS POWERS AND HIS POSITION. IT IS VITAL THAT EVERYONE WHO IS AWARE OF THIS PETITION SHOULD SIGN IT, BECAUSE THERE MAY COME A TIME WHEN YOU OR I ARE ACCUSED OF A CRIME, AND WHEREBY THE JUDGE REFUSES US THE BASIC HUMAN RIGHT OF ALLOWING OUR DEFENCE TO CHALLENGE OUR ACCUSER(S) AND FOR US TO FACE OUR ACCUSERS."
you have the power to create change.
Start sharing and watch your impact grow
com/128/284/484/the-right-to- face-your-accusers-in-a-court- of-law/
video: CHRIS SPIVEY,2nd ARREST OCT 2014 -VERY DISTURBING FOOTAGE OF THE CRIMINAL ESSEX THUG POLICE.
Proof that the Social Workers, Nicole Miles & Julie Robinson blatantly lied in a bid to steal Clayton Spivey
Hands up who thinks it is acceptable for a Social Worker to repeatedly lie to the parents of a child that they (the social worker) are assessing?
I will remind you that the content of a Social Workers assessment determines whether or not a parent gets to keep something that to most sane people is their be all and end all in life i.e. their child or children.
So obviously I sincerely hope -that no one thinks it is acceptable for a social worker to lie when compiling an assessment on a child.
Therefore, hands up who thinks that a Social Worker caught lying to the parents of a child that they are assessing should face instant dismissal and removal from the HCPC register?
So that will be everyone then.
Cool, now hands up who thinks that a Social Worker caught lying to the parents of a child that they are assessing which would or has led to that child being effectively abducted by the State should face a mandatory minimum 10 years in prison?
Before you answer, look at your child and try to imagine how you would feel if a social worker – backed by the police – entered your home and snatched your terrified child away from you, as you look on helplessly, knowing that you are never going to see your baby again – despite the fact that you have done absolutely nothing wrong… I will now ask again:
Hands up who thinks that a Social Worker caught lying to the parents of a child that they are assessing which would or has led to that child being effectively abducted by the State should face a mandatory minimum 10 years in prison?
Again, that will be everyone then.
Last one now… Hands up who thinks that a Social Worker caught conspiring to abduct a child by deliberately filling in an assessment using false information that incriminates a parent should face a mandatory life prison sentence with a minimum 20 year tariff?
That will be everyone then.
And if that was the law – a law that every sane, responsible loving parent would agree with – instead of the law being a party to and often acting in collusion with the Social Services (SS) then both Nicole Miles Registration number SW58847 and her manager, Julie Robinson Registration number SW599792 would now be looking at spending the next 20 years getting battered by some hulking great dyke… Nothing short of what the pair of criminals deserve, because the latter is exactly what they have attempted to do.
In the meantime, if anyone reading this has had dealings with this pair, or indeed knows of anyone who has, then please get in touch with me via e-mail at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Now, since the pair of child snatchers and the police love to keep abreast with the latest news on here, I best make myself very clear: This is not harassment of the pair on my behalf, indeed, on the contrary they have both been – and to a certain extent still are – blatantly harassing myself and my daughter Stacey.
Furthermore, I am writing this expoše in my capacity as an Investigative Reporter, acting in the pursuit of uncovering a crime – a very serious one at that and which I am going to provide evidence for as this report unfolds.
Indeed, my only aim and motivation in asking for any former victims of the pair to contact me is so as to gather evidence of the pairs repeat offending and in doing so maybe get some justice for those victims too.
Moreover, the fact that I am having to expose the pair – who are but two of many, many social workers nationwide, who are committing the same crime on a daily basis – is because the wholly corrupt Essex Police Force, acting in collusion with the pair (and no doubt not for the first time), simply are not doing the job that the British taxpayer is paying them to do.
This then is Part 3 of my presentation of evidence that I have acquired, which all goes to prove that:
- Social Workers employed by Castle Point Social Services
- acting in collusion with Police Officers working out of Southend Central Police Station
- having conspired and put into action an agreed plan
- to remove Clayton Spivey, aged just 18 months old, from his loving stable home
- using fabricated evidence planted by the police
- as justification for social workers, Nicole Miles and Julie Robinson to compile and submit a core assessment
- malicious & vindictive in intent and based as a whole on content consisting of either; fabricated, embellished, and/or incorrect information, much of which is left open to misinterpretation and some of which was illegally obtained in contravention to the Data Protection Act.
Part 1; Proof of the Social Services insidious agenda to steal Clayton Spivey and Part 2: This Day In History: Clayton’s Day can be accessed by simply clicking on their titles.
Now all those who have been closely following this abhorrent conspiracy will be aware that:
- having covertly submitted Clayton’s core assessment on the 20th of November – SIX days earlier than we were led to believe, and unbeknownst to us, necessarily submitted based entirely on the fact that the police referral and the commencement of the assessment had inexplicably begun 5 days before my arrest
- both Nicole Miles & Julie Robinson repeatedly neglected to mention that fact in a deliberate bid to conceal the unfathomable premature police referral and subsequent premature undertaking of the core assessment to myself and Stacey
- and in doing so went through the motions of attending a planned strategy meeting on Monday the 24th of November with police officers, supposedly held specifically to gather information to be included in the assessment
- and having done so, subsequently attended a pre-arranged meeting with myself & Stacey which took place on Wednesday the 26th of November, under the guise of allowing Miles to complete and submit the aforementioned covertly submitted assessment
- whereby at the meeting, in a deliberate bid to keep up the pretence that Miles & Robinson were acting with honour and integrity, both continued to remain silent about the date of the assessments submission
- and indeed suffice to say that we would still not have known about the early submission to date were it not for the fact that I picked up on the gross anomaly whilst reading a copy of the assessment
- which going by the copy that we were given would indicate that the assessment had actually been submitted incomplete, thus omitting important detail.
You will also be aware that
- having finally had the time to properly read the assessment...continues @ source: http://chrisspivey.org/proof-
that-the-social-workers- nicole-miles-julie-robinson- blatantly-lied-in-a-bid-to- steal-clayton-spivey/#more- 24479