THE DISGRACEFUL TARGETING OF MAURICE KIRK: "FURTHER WITNESSES FOR RESTRAINING ORDER TRIAL" [VIDEO] JULY 3 2017 + archive

Further Witnesses for Restraining Order Trial

Posted on July 3, 2017 by mauricekirky

 

AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRISTS REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK0
9 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans (2) 
17 07 01 12-12-13-morgan-cole-mjk-response
17 06 28 CPS throw in the towel

2nd July 2017                                                                                             C90CF012
FAO Cardiff County Court                                                                     BS614159 +2
Wales
Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police, HM Justice Ministry & HM Parole Board
False Imprisonment and Perversion of Justice

Dear Sir,

1. At the last hearing I asked for judgements/orders etc to be sent by email address.
2. At my April/May 2016 default judgement application (first form error for correct case number, corrected by 2nd hand written) neither Parole Board nor Justice Ministry filed defences unless you now say otherwise? What was the result, please?
3. I enclose my first 2016 claim enclosing Article10 inadvertently left out of my 7th Sept 2016 amended particulars and ask for proof it was filed with the court last year?
4. At the last hearing, by sheer chance that I even attended believing I was legally represented, I left more confused over a purported judgement of last summer, by a judge North? Please send me copy confirming it had been originally sent by email?
5. At the last hearing, if my poor memory is correct, Defendant or Defendants denied knowledge of my 7th September 2016 amended claim being received when it was served on the court and I was told any fee paid. Has my lawyer been nobbled?

6, Now I have sent again to your court another copy, as per court direction, of my 7th September 2016 particulars and request proof of service as I have asked for proof of service, in the past, for my original application for full default judgment in 2016.

7. I remember last time I was so stupid to sue HM Partnership, the reason for remaining in the EU for protection us from HM widespread abuse by underlings, Cardiff County Court apologised to itself saying, “perhaps, the service of particulars of £50,000 claim on HM Governor of Cardiff Prison’ was overlooked!
8. ‘A likely story’ when the Co-Defendant, the police, acknowledged receipt of service
9. You still refuse disclosure of those simple records in my first HM Partnership skirmish (5^th Action) and since then have wrongly closed ranks with your police to prevent my expediting both my civil and criminal cases while continuing this disruption by not allowing me to stand at the public counter for ‘due process’.
10. Your court refuses to let me have sight of the BS614159 +2 Maurice Kirk v Police claims court records who’s appeal is now filed in the RCJ also requiring copy of court log, exhibits, evidence and all court refusals, especially key witness subpoenas.
11. Is it any wonder the RCJ appear to continue to not process my appeal, as a ‘can of worms’, while your court has even confiscated, over a year ago, my police interview tape, because ‘indictable and not under caution’ from one of my 33 successful defences for malicious prosecutions of many due before your ‘system’.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
14 08 11 particulars of claim
17 07 01 12-12-13-morgan-cole-mjk-response



Brittany cottage field and


carp lake for only £30,000

Resident pig and Genevieve extra (just caught her first carp)

 

 Another just one hour from St Malo boat for only £30,000 (carp lake, opposite, is extra)

tel _+447708586202



AN EVIL EXAMPLE OF BENT LONDON LAWYERS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE VULNERABLE LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK NOW BREXIT IS POSSIBLE

Dear Mr Hill,   I refer to your email of 29 June 2017.   As always we are open to engage in settlement discussions, as we agree it is important to save costs and stop your firm and your clients defacing the legal profession. However any form of negotiation will have to be on realistic terms. As mentioned on a vast number of occasions the assets that your clients have placed charges on are not ours in equity. In addition any negotiation would have to take into account:   1.      The fact that we fully intend on appealing the Court of Appeals decision and have in turn sought advice in relation to challenging other decisions which include that of Registrar Clive Jones. I am not sure whether you are aware of this or not but at the last hearing evidence was produced that Mr Gill had brought a fraudulent claim against us (something which he has admitted and was produced to the court and your clients) where he stated in the clearest of terms that he had brought a bogus and fraudulent claim to deceive his receiver and avoid bankruptcy himself; 2.      That there are no creditors in our bogus bankruptcies (we would be willing to provide your clients with an indemnity on this point); 3.      That we are granted an annulment under section 282(1)(a) of the Insolvency Act 1986, which has already been granted by Mr Robert Ham QC in 2012, not under section 282(1)(b) as your clients had previously suggested; 4.      Contrary to Mr Briggs’ recent submissions there are outstanding investigations by the ICAEW and Insolvency Service which are still pending; and 5.      Finally that there are outstanding applications challenging the remuneration of your clients.   My family and I have lost a great deal and in addition our health has suffered as a result of these invalid proceedings which I remind you stem from an invalid bankruptcy petition which has been established by the High Court to have been obtained by fraud and was set aside over 5 years ago.   The only reason why Justice has yet to prevail is because your firm and Kingston Smith LLP are equipped with endless funds from an insurance company, which I have no doubt will pull the carpet from under your feet once they are informed of the sham proceedings that have been wrongly prolonged by your side for over a decade through a web of deceit. I have for several years requested the details of the insurance and both your firm and your clients has adamantly refused, as I am sure you are all fully aware that no insurance would cover fraud.   We have not won our case yet but the truth will come out one day and everyone will be exposed as was the case with Dean & Dean. Had your firm not instructed a part-time Registrar in the same Court, John Briggs, at our expense then this matter would have ended by now.    For years I warned your client’s and the Court that Dean & Dean’s claim was bogus yet they turned a blind eye. For years I told them that the pam.com claim was both set aside and bogus though your firm, clients, Mr Briggs, and his colleague Registrar Clive Jones turned a blind eye, even ignoring the recent tape recording of Mr Gill himself admitting it was a bogus claim to protect himself when under receivership.   When I requested the cause of the action from your client in 2007 to set aside the other bogus default judgement claim brought by Bathurst Brown Downie & Airey they unwarrantedly refused. Then almost 10 years later again Mr Briggs’ colleague, Registrar Clive Jones, without jurisdiction admitted that claim partially even without them attending the hearing.  We are currently seeking advice from a CPS prosecuting Barrister on the matter and considering the possibility of the merits of instigating a private criminal prosecution for the conduct of the your clients in our invalid bankruptcies.    As I already reminded, all these proceedings stem from a invalid bankruptcy petition which was obtained through fraud and deception on the Court by a convicted criminal posing as a Solicitor, Shahrokh Mireskandari, and your client’s knowingly turned a blind eye and have done their utmost to ensure the truth remains silenced.   Your clients took all our family’s assets and forced us to defend ourselves, for the majority of the time as a litigants in person, over a decade whilst they hired and fired four of the biggest law firms, senior barristers and a part-time Registrar to represent them, despite them being Officer’s of the Court and fully capable of speaking for themselves, and these costs were wrongfully put in my family’s estate. We have yet to have been provided with a fair hearing nor have your clients actions in any way been ethical. One way or another (as was the case with Dean & Dean) justice will prevail. If necessary I will go all the way to the ECHR and will seek to publicly expose your clients wrongdoings and will have no hesitation in doing so. For years now we have been in contact with a number of journalists and it will only be a matter of time till a story is published in the press about your clients. It took several years for them to publish a story on Dean & Dean following my efforts on the same basis it wont be long now till your clients are publicly exposed.  Especially when we now live in a world where through social media within minutes people from all over the world can see and hear everything. It amazes me how none of you have any respect for yourselves or the legal profession you represent.    We have repeated ourselves for years now and repeated our offer numerous times. We are not looking to make any money from these proceedings, however it is clear that both your firm and your client are looking to use the fraudulent invalid orders as weapons to steal.    I would therefore repeat the same offer we made your clients last time:   For all parties to swallow their own costs (myself, Mr Hines and Kingston Smith), to put a permanent stay on all proceedings (both in Chancery and Bankruptcy) and to bring the bankruptcies to an end immediately with no payment to the bogus creditors (which has been clearly established).   In respect of the upcoming hearings, the hearing of 4th July should not proceed for several reasons. When the Statutory Demand was invalidly served I looked to take steps to set it aside, however you informed Mr Hines not to as you assured him that you would not take any actions to enforce it. Your firm then went without informing either myself or Mr Hines and proceeded with a petition before Registrar Baister, who should not have had any action in our case; as I have said for years now there is an Order stating that Registrar Baister should have no action in our case.    Finally the hearing of 10th July should be stayed because the Court of Appeal has yet to hand down an Order; and in any case if we are not satisfied with that Order we will be appealing it. As outlined on a number of occasions the hearing was listed without my consent and we were only notified of it recently despite the application having been made in January this year. This was again contrary to the undertaking given before Lady Justice Gloster where Mr Briggs’ undertook not to make any application until the Court of Appeal had reached a decision as is noted from the Official Transcript. Regards, Dr Oraki Sent from my iPhone On 29 Jun 2017, at 15:56, Hill, Patrick <phill@dacbeachcroft.com> wrote: Dear Mr Hines and Dr Oraki   I write further to the telephone message which I left with Mr Hines office on Monday 26 June.   The purpose of my call was to speak on a without prejudice save as to costs basis and to understand whether there is any appetite on the part of your clients to engage with our clients in settlement discussions. Any such discussions will need to reflect that fact that your clients will be liable for: (i) our clients’ costs of defending the High Court and Court of Appeal proceedings; and (ii) the Trustees’ costs, expenses and remuneration.   I anticipate that if your clients were minded to engage constructively in the process on the basis set out above, my clients would be prepared to put forward a proposal which is along the lines of that set out in our letter dated 20 September 2016, but making appropriate adjustments for developments in the intervening period including the additional costs which have been incurred. Please note that, at this stage, I do not have instructions from my clients to make a specific proposal to you.   You will appreciate that our clients’ petition for the second bankruptcies of your clients will be heard on 4 July 2017 and that the High Court detailed assessment proceedings will take place on 10 July 2017.   I look forward to hearing from you by return – please contact Declan if I am unavailable.   Yours sincerely     Patrick Hill Partner DAC Beachcroft LLP   London

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Witnesses for the forth coming 4th Jury trial

Posted on July 1, 2017 by mauricekirky

include:  Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams
09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED
AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRISTS REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK

Dr’s wife,  Dr  Janis Hilliar
Her 2012 statement to the police re Maurice found, at the dead of night, at her home with a cans of petrol

Menage-a-trois Mr Eiffion Edwards
12 05 01 eiffion edwards statement
11 11 08 Curry REDACTED

Caswell Clinic  Ms Elisabeth Paul
Her eight MAPPA level 3 meetings notes
09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans (2)
10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED

Caswell Clinic  Dr Ruth Bagshaw
Full file on Professor Rodger Wood’s spectacular findings
Caswell Clinic   Dr Gaynor Jones
full Caswell brain-scan records castigating Dr TW and lying Wood
9 12 1 medical Kemp

SWP retired liar Barbara Wilding
Her specific orders to kill me in order to preserve her pension
NHS (Wales)  masonic Paul Jones
the obvious
NHS scavengers, Morgan Cole solicitors
17 07 01 12-12-13-morgan-cole-mjk-response

the vivid account by Dr Tegwyn Williams re police finding their victim , ‘in the dead of night, with cans of avgas lurking in a doctor’s garden’
Dolmans solicitor, Adrian Oliver

The overarching conspirator  using doctors as porn (spelt right?)
police man, Mr David Vaughan
his orders not to disclose Visor/custody police records over 25 year period
ex CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans
and the rest not said by him in Bristol Crown Court
Crown Prosecutor Mr Killick
the full CPS files on machine-gun/MAPPA/ Caswell clinic conspiracy
Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University
10 05 26 NHS Deny Rcds Exist

Judge Richard Thomlow
Judge John Curran
just for ‘starters’
this list is far from exhaustive



Police led by Mr Frank Werren at Caswell Clinic in search of a suspected burglar out to steal his own medical records.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Mad as a Box of Frogs

Posted on July 1, 2017 by mauricekirky

Corruption in welsh institutions is not just confined to the South Wales Police, not by along chalk!

For example,
Morgan Cole, solicitors, financed by tax payer to protect Dr Tegwyn Williams in my a £840 claim due to blocking my already arranged appointment at caswell clinic with Dr Gaynor……………
17 07 01 12-12-13-morgan-cole-mjk-response
Refused court transcripts4 1 10

A typical false missive from the corrupt Luigi Strinnati


Police ‘assault’ charge against me was lost at appeal but ex police officer’s assault on me in Cardiff Crown Court, when breaking my leg by pushing me down the stairs, entered the pleadings of my two million pound claim against the Welsh authorities last month.
And Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) destroying the incriminating evidence
12 12 21 CPS Dicken RO

Totally disproved Lee Barker witness statement by cross examination of him and lying HM court clerk saying I was coming down the corridor, on crutches, when I had the restraining order served on me that was also proved fictitious.
Barker_Statement (1)

The 21st Dec 2012 CPS letter admitting the 1st Dec 2011 court ‘draft’ restraining order, for my consideration, ‘can no longer be found’ is topped, by misbelief with this, their latest fairy tale of public records are 6 years old and therefore not discloseable!



and following the 4th May 2012 jury, asking to see court proof I had ever could have  known about yet alone was served a restraining order, Cardiff’s HMC&TS, under the control of Luigi Strannati, frantically tried to alter the court log but made a right botch of it. (all twelve hearings squeezed on to one page).



Luigi Stranati, incidentally, the South Wales area court manager and Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University have a substantial reward on their heads for what he and his cronies have done to my family over these past 25 years. We need their whereabouts at home in order that they have a visit, unannounced.

Please contact by email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com or telephone

This Luigi was seen desperately trying to remove all the Cardiff magistrates chairs from my alleged harassment of Dr Tegwyn Williams November 2011 trial to try and stop my helpers, such as my sister over from Jersey, Sabine McNeil over from Germany, the notorious Llangannor Six, a retired law lecturer from London and many, many more from entry to a UK public court.

(Interestingly, I noticed private lawyers for NHS, Caswell Clinic, police and Dr Tegwyn Williams were all allowed into the hearing with reserved chairs to witness no retraining order, they will deny, was ever mentioned to be taken from the court room and served on me in my cell.

Many there witnessed it was the part CPS typed, part Judge John Charles hand written draft ‘restraining order’ by the sacked CPS barrister David Gareth Evans who was made to admit it on cross examination in Bristol Crown Court, that was brought to my cell for agreement but unable to be even read rolled up in Lee Barker’s fist!

Gareth had to first go down the tortuous route of a private person’s arrest  in order to the get the above evidence on oath.



Gareth Lea Barker, below, will be my key defence witnesses at next month’s 4th jury trial on the same matter.




All these eighty odd police malicious prosecutions stemmed  from my civil damages claims against the police, started in 1992, and it was he, Luigi Strannati, that was tasked by the police to have all my court lodged files in Cardiff courts, around 130 by 2002, to be sent to HM Solicitor -General to have me registered a ‘vexatious litigant’ with obvious consequences for blocking any civil redress



The Tegwyn saga was dreamed up by Barbara Wilding as my civil claims endangered her lucrative penson. She therefore deceitfully swore, six weeks late to His honour Judge Nicholas ChambersQC’s order, the following witness statement but only by my getting into Adrian Oliver’s office and thamping on his desk very hard until it was done.


09 02 25 Barbara Wilding Affidavit Lies (2)



The following extract  from the Tom Gruchy collection of videos capture the Llantwit Major police video they failed to have destroyed in time catching then Sgt Nicholas Kilberg lying to the custody sergeant that I had been swearing in a public place. The officer on the right would not substantiate that fact was further proved by unlawfully shredded police statements in the civil trial, now on appeal with 32 other malicious police incidents blocked at the RCJ these past two years!

That is the true state of our UK law courts, pre Brexit, so god help you lot, without EU law but I will be long gone

Kilberg went on to give further lies against me in several motoring cases that the royal college used to have my name removed from the veterinary register for life.



Watch another police video clumsily doctored showed my being assault by police, dragged out of my car, without arrest, to obtain a false motoring offence the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons used to remove my name from the veterinary register for life,



09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED
10 11 24 GMC Complaint_0001
12 01 20 Remand Warrant &12 02 22 Judge Curan Court Order
10 10 17 GMC Wales complaint REDACTED
11 11 15 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates REDACTED
12 05 01 eiffion edwards statement
10 06 16 CAA Medical
9 12 1 medical Kemp
09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans (2)
11 01 17 GMC
NHS Court Order Scan-14-Feb-13

Archive continues @

MAURICE KIRK: Further Witnesses for Restraining Order Trial VIDEO July 3 + archive

Posted on July 4, 2017