TO THE STARS : DISCLOSURE WHETHER THEY LIKE IT OR NOT
This new effort by Tom DeLonge and a high profile team of scientists, intelligence agents and aerospace engineers to disclose the truth about UFOs and ETs focuses on the technology. This is a predicable effort which is better late than never. And if it wasn't for the disclosures of Captain Mark Richards revealing that Reptilians are forcing disclosure you probably would think this was coming out of the well intentioned hearts of the team on stage in this video. See below for actual quoted text**.
But the truth, as usual, is more complex. Be aware that when certain ET / extra dimensional entities are pushing disclosure because they believe it will create chaos, the humans have no choice but to try to get people up to speed with the truth before that happens. This is the effort you are witnessing. To the Stars Academy is for beginners, newbies and those in denial about whether we are "alone". While for young people with good intuition and awareness this effort is rudimentary. For those in denial and those who are completely lodged in the 3D reality.. where seeing is believing, this will be a beginning.
My advice guys, not that you asked, is to reformulate your message to be more clear about who you really are and what you want. Fishing for more ufo reports from the masses is not gonna get it done by the way... In case you haven't noticed UFOs and Abductions have been and are being reported daily on Youtube. Don't act like this is the 1960s... come on everyone knows we are not alone. It's the secrecy you are trying to break through and pretend it's all gonna be different. You are a good potential team but you need to lead with more than some half-assed ufo encounter. Did I hear one of you say "Maybe were not alone"? Really? You are going to have to do better than that or you will all disappear into the dust of history in the making.
SO CALL IT A SECRET MACHINE OR AERIAL THREATS, UFOS ARE REAL. SOFT DISCLOSURE IS HERE NOW...
Quote from Mark Richards VII: Total Recal VII:
..."
DISCLOSURE / ALEPPO / REPTOIDS PUSHING DISCLOSURE?
I asked him more about status on the Reptoids pushing disclosure, which he had mentioned in my prior interview?
The progress — what are they building near Aleppo? A stargate. To bring troops and craft into this dimension. He says they have aircraft carrier sized craft and can bring 5,000 troops in at a time.
But he also said they can take back 30,000 to 40,000 human prey, dead or alive... He said they trade human slaves to other races -- it's one of their "businesses".
He thinks they have been dealt with for the time being due to battles with them. At least at this location."--Kerry
source: https://projectcamelotportal.com/2017/10/16/to-the-stars-disclosure-whether-they-like-it-or-not/
Top UFO Researcher talks Tom DeLonge, Steven Greer and evil aliens
AS MENTIONED IN THE ABOVE 1st VIDEO: ARTICLES PERTAINING TO "NIMITZ UFO 2004: THERE I WAS" - see the 3rd link down:
source: https://projectcamelotportal.com/2017/10/16/to-the-stars-disclosure-whether-they-like-it-or-not/
Top UFO Researcher talks Tom DeLonge, Steven Greer and evil aliens
AS MENTIONED IN THE ABOVE 1st VIDEO: ARTICLES PERTAINING TO "NIMITZ UFO 2004: THERE I WAS" - see the 3rd link down:
Transcript of To the Stars Academy Press Conference | Openminds.tv
www.openminds.tv › Featured
6 days ago - And three, there are things that are so unimaginable that certain .... you can find on the web by searching on Nimitz UFOs 2004 there I was.Fmr. Manager of DOD Aerospace Threat Program: "UFOs are Real ...
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/.../fmr-manager-of-dod-aerospace-threat-program-uf...
6 days ago - “We believe there are discoveries within our reach that will .... He presented an overview of a 2004 incident involving the battleship USS Nimitz ...3] There I Was: The X-Files Edition | Fighter Sweep
https://fightersweep.com/1460/x-files-edition/
14 Mar 2015 - I had never given aliens or UFOs much thought. ... On the morning of 14 November 2004, Dave and his WSO launched into the clear blue ... before setting off to their assigned work area in the open ocean south of USS Nimitz.Alien BREAKTHROUGH: Rock star vows to reveal 'clear' UFO footage ...
www.dailystar.co.uk › News › Weird News
3 days ago - SIGHTING: A UFO that encountered the USS Nimitz ... The truth is out there, these rare photographs of UFO sightings date back as far as 1870.I-Team: Public company launched to investigate UFOs - Story - KLAS-TV
www.lasvegasnow.com/news/i-team-public-company-launched...ufos/833004610
6 days ago - I-Team: Public company launched to investigate UFOs ... On a sunny day in 2004 off the coast of San Diego, the USS Nimitz battle group .... There were also hints of a possible partnership in which government photos and ...UFOs Seen by Crew of an American Aircraft-Carrier - UFO magazines ...
www.fsr.org.uk/fsrart4.htm
And there were also many other UFO sightings in Western Europe on that same day during the NATO exercise. .... The sensational shots of a silver space-ship on the USS Nimitz were taken in 1989, but hushed up by the Bush ... FSR 2004.USS Nimitz - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz
USS Nimitz (CVN-68) is a supercarrier of the United States Navy, and the lead ship of her class. ... February 2004 to August 2004 – Planned Incremental Availability – catwalk grating was replaced and flight deck resurfaced. .... new home port of NAS North Island in San Diego, California, arriving there on 13 November 2001.Operation Highjump - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Highjump
Operation Highjump, officially titled The United States Navy Antarctic Developments Program, .... In December 2004, an attempt was made to locate the remains of the plane. There are ongoing efforts to repatriate the bodies of the three men killed in the crash. Some time after December 30, 1946, Vance N. Woodall died ...Mystery surrounds images of two fighter jets following a UFO in ...
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../What-military-planes-chasing-Mystery-surrounds-images-tw...
21 Jan 2016 - In their latest bizarre sighting, alien hunters claim to have spotted a UFO (top left) being followed by military aircraft in Bulgaria, Images ...The UFO Chronicles on Twitter: "#UFO Tracked By #Radar and ...
https://twitter.com/UFOChronicles/status/918534925250453505
5 days ago - UFO News: Current and Historic Reports From Around The World .... and Photographed Over USS Nimitz https://goo.gl/fb/YzEV9D #2004 #aavs ...List of UFO sightings
This list of UFO sightings and UFO incidents summarize a selection of cases that are considered to be of particular importance to UFO -themics and are often found in the literature on the subject. The entries are classified according to J. Allen Hynek's classification system for UFO encounters .
On the night of September 18, 1976, several calls are made to the Tower of Mehrabad Airport in Tehran. Residents of Tehran report an unusual light over the city. Hossein Pirouzi, the flight attendant, can identify the object through binoculars. In his description, a bright, white light with a red light in the middle. After passing on the information to the responsible Luftwaffegeneral general, a Phantom F-4 interceptor for reconnaissance will be launched around 00:30 hours . Both the pilot and the navigator of this jet can see the object. When the interceptor has approached the object, the electronics and communications of the jet fail. The pilot decides to reverse. On the way back, the systems worked again. The jet is landed and a second Phantom F-4 hunter is launched. The pilot of this machine is Major Parwis Jaafari. He and his navigator can also visually confirm the object. Jafari describes the object later as brightly lit and intensely flashing in different colors. On the way to the object, this would have jumped several times over a long distance. The Bordradar could capture the object, according to the pilot and navigator. As the F-4 approaches the object, the electronic electronics are also off. According to Jafari, a small light ball breaks out of the large object and flies towards the jet. Dschafari considers it a rocket and tries to shoot it with a heat-seeking missile . This attempt failed due to the failure of the weapon systems. Jafari also decides to return. The small object pursues and orbits the jet for several minutes, while the jet continues its return flight to the airport. Only after the small object is turned off does the electronic electronics work again. Shortly thereafter, a smaller brightly lit object is observed as it goes to the ground outside Tehran. According to Jaafari, all the objects were abruptly disappeared a short time after their landing. A later investigation of the presumed regional site yielded no results.
In addition to statements by Major Parwis Jaafari and Hossein Pirouzi, this case is documented by a report by the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Representatives of the DIA were present during debriefing and were able to speak with the witnesses and superiors. [1] [2]
investigations
At around 21:20 UTC-3 (local time), the Brazilian Air Force reported the unidentified flight movements near the city of São José dos Campos . The message comes from the control tower of the airport of the city. Several lights are described which change their color between red, yellow, green and orange and can be detected by radar. The occupation of a civilian machine can confirm the sighting and describes a red star that moves from east to west. At around 22:20 the first fighter jet is launched. A total of five jets, two from the Santa Cruz Air Base and three from Anápolis Air Base, will start in the next two hours. Three of the pilots manage to make contact with the objects. Several radar stations on the ground register the objects during operation.
At 22:55, Captain Viriato can capture an object in a Mirage by aircraft radar and trace it for a few minutes before it disappears from the radar. Viriato says later that the object would have flown zigzag according to radar. Visually Viriato could not make out the object. At 23:15 Leutnant Kleber, a pilot of an F-5E Tiger II , sees a lightball in front of his machine. His radar and ground radar show a contact at 19 kilometers from his jet. Glue sticks the object in the direction of the Atlantic, without having to catch it. At 23:20, Captain Jordão can make a red light in an F-5E and make radar contact to an object at 32 kilometers distance. Jordão follows the target a few minutes, until the target disappears simultaneously from the viewpoint and from the radar. Later thirteen objects from the ground radar are located close to the jet. They accompany the jet for a few minutes, without Jordão seeing the targets. Only after a 180 ° turn do the objects disappear. Against 1:00 all objects have disappeared and the jets landed again. [5] [6]
Four days later, on 23 May 1986, Brazilian aviation minister, Octavio Moreira Lima, convened a press conference with responsible military personnel as well as the pilots of the military machinery involved. Lima confirms the incident and reports: "For several minutes our jets were followed by these objects. [...] And the explanation? We can not give you any since we do not have any. " [7] Therefore, the incident is called" Official UFO Night. " Minister Lima announces to publish an official investigation report within 30 days. This announcement was not complied with, such a report never published. [8] Only in 2009 was a secret internal investigation of the events released to the public. [See investigations below]
investigations
Japan Airlines Flight 1628 is a cargo flight from Paris via Reykjavík , Anchorage to Tokyo . The crew consists of Kenuk Terauchi, copilot Takanori Tamefuji and flight engineer Yoshio Tsukuba. On the way from Reykjavík to Anchorage on 17 November 1986 against 17:10 UTC-9 at an airport of about 10.5 km, Captain Terauchi looks under the Boeing 747 strange lights. Terauchi considers them to be military machines and does not give them any special attention. A few minutes, the lights seem to fly parallel to flight 1628 and follow the engine. At 17:20, these lights disappear and suddenly two larger objects appear before the Boeing 747 . The aircraft crew described the objects later as rectangles on whose long sides several rows of round, bright, yellow lights are. The lights would have illuminated the interior of the cockpit and would have been as intense as plane lights. The light was warm on the skin. The ground radar of the Air Route Traffic Control Center could not capture the objects. Approximately For 10 minutes the objects accompanied the Boeing and flew in formation slight curves. About 17:30 they disappear abruptly. Seconds later, Terauchi removes a larger glowing object in the direction of flight. Terauchi switches on the weather radar of the aircraft and receives the contact of a non-solid object, such as a cloud bank, about 14 km away. Both the civilian ground radar and the military radar of the Elmendorf Air Force Base can also confirm a radar contact. A few minutes later Flight 1628 approaches the town of Fairbanks . In the sky, illuminated by the lights of the city, the occupant defines the silhouette of a large, dark, spherical object, the luminous object being a light of the large spherical object. Terauchi describes the size later as "similar to a plane carrier". Flight 1628 tries to avoid the object in a large curve and leave behind. The object appears to follow the Boeing and is still visible from the side window of the cockpit. In doing so, the object changes its position more than once over long distances. [12] Around 17:40, ground control asks the pilots of a United Airlines passenger aircraft to change their course to confirm the sighting. Against 17:50, before United Airlines comes into sight, the spherical object falls back and disappears from the view of Flight 1628 and the radar. United Airlines can not do anything unusual. Flight 1628 lands at 18:20 at the airport Anchorage.
All three crew members of Flight 1628 confirmed this statement. The case became known in the media weeks later and then aroused great media interest. [13] [14]
investigations
On the evening of August 24, 1990, more than a hundred persons will see bright light globes over the Greifswalder Bodden . The first sightings were made around 20:15 and lasted until 21:00. The spheres were described as "glaringly bright" with reddish-white light and could be seen from Usedom, Rügen and places between Rostock and Neubrandenburg. The objects were divided into two groups of 6-7 lights each. Four videofilms and various photographs were made. None of the videofilms shows the incident in full length, but only a few minutes. Also, most witnesses have observed only part of the time the phenomenon.
The objects swayed slightly, but remained motionless. On the films, small light flashes can be seen from time to time. At least once one of the groups was extinguished and then dived again about a minute later elsewhere. Whether this happened several times is controversial. Even if there have been isolated flight movements of the light balls is controversial. Thus a witness reported, "smaller objects flew away from the formations, stopped for a short time and flew back into them". Consensus is that the last items went out around 9:00 pm.
The Greifswald objects are the most famous UFO incident in German territory. [17] [18]
investigations
On the morning of September 16, 1994, around 10:15, 62 pupils aged 8 to 12 years of the private Ariel Primary School (primary school) observed three unusual objects in the sky. According to the reports, these were round, metallic, and had red flashing lights. They disappeared several times to reappear in another part of the sky. One of the objects would have slowly sunk downwards after a few minutes and had fallen to the ground behind a tree group at a distance of about 100 meters from the school building. At this time, the teachers of the school were at a meeting in the building and dismissed the calls of the children as a game.
The students reported that they had run to the presumed site. The description of the children is consistent in the essential points: Behind the group of trees, a large, round, metallic object in the form of a flying saucer floated or hovered above the ground. It was a being at the object, a second had risen out of the object. The beings were described as small, dressed in a kind of black jumpsuit , pale facial, large black, oval eyes, and long black hair. The beings had not spoken. However, some children said they had received words that criticized the environmental disasters caused by humanity. Many of the students were afraid and had run back to the school building, where they had informed the teachers. Teachers described the children's behavior as panicky. The object will be lifted again after a short time. When teachers arrived at the site, there were no signs of the object or for a landing. In various details about the appearance of the object, the appearance of the beings, or the course of the encounter, the students' statements differed. [22]
investigations
On the evening of March 13, 1997, a series of UFO sightings took place in a Phoenix area . The sightings can be split into two sighting waves. The first wave of vision began at 20:15 with testimonials from Prescott . The following sightings result in a southern route of the lights. At around 8:30 pm, the lights fly over Phoenix's witnesses, around 20:45 Tucson . At around 9:00 PM they are seen near Tucson. The reports come from hundreds of witnesses, including police stations, the local air base, or the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC). [26] The witnesses speak of a V-shaped formation of 5 to 9 white and / or red lights, which have spanned a great distance of several hundred meters. Most eyewitnesses report that these lights were attached to the underside of a massive dark, V- shaped or Delta- shaped object. When flying, this object would have obscured the stars of the afterthread so that the silhouette of the object could be seen. Most witnesses say that it was silent and rather slow. Air traffic controllers from the nearby Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport were also able to see the lights but did not identify them. The radar had no contact. No videos or photos are known for this event. [27] [28]
The second sight wave begins around 22:00. Hundreds of witnesses see a row of bright, white lights over the Estrella Mountains southwest of Phoenix. The lights appeared briefly one after the other, hovering on the spot and extinguished 4-5 minutes later. From this event, there are several video films and photos. [29]
The case was initially only noticed in some local newspapers. It was only through an article of the USA Today on June 18, 1997, more than ten weeks after the event, that the case became more or less widely known. [30] In 2007, the incident once again attracted the public interest: The governor of Arizona at the time of the incident, Fife Symington III. , stated in an interview that he had observed the alleged object himself. Symington said he had seen a "huge, delta-shaped" object, which, according to him, could not be derived from humans. At a press conference immediately after the incident, Symington had made a significant contribution to ridicule the incident by presenting his policeman as an "alien costume" in an alien costume. [31]
investigations
The Luke Air Force Base has announced that at 10:00 pm so-called flares of military aircraft have been dropped for exercise purposes. Most investigators agree that the second sight wave is due to these flares from around 22:00, so all published photos and videos show these flares. [28] The further investigations refer therefore only to the first sighting wave from 20:15 to 21:00 clock.
Table of Contents
[ Hide ]Tabular overview of selected UFO incidents [ Edit | Edit source ]
| date | designation | place | object | witnesses | class |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 12, 1883 | Bonilla Observation | Mexico, Zacatecas (city) | Flying saucer | 1 | DD |
| Nov. 1896 - May 1897 | Phantom Airship Wave 1896-1897 | USA, several places | various 'airships' | 10,000+ | DD, CE-1 |
| 1946 | Scandinavian UFO wave | Sweden , several places | Missile-like | 1,000+ | NL, DD |
| July 8, 1947 | ROSWELL INCIDENT | United States, Roswell (New Mexico) | Flying saucer (balloon) / balloon | ?, depending on the count | CE-2, CE-3 |
| October 1, 1948 | Gorman Dogfight | United States, Fargo | Lichtkugel | 1 | RV, CE-1 |
| September 20, 1961 | Abduction Betty and Barney Hill | United States, White Mountains (New Hampshire) | Flying saucer | 2 | CE 4 |
| 5 November 1975 | Abduction Travis Walton | United States, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest | Flying saucer | 7 | CE 4 |
| 18 September 1976 | Tehran incident | Iran, Tehran | Light ball, several | 5+ | NL, CE-2 |
| Dec. 26, 1980 - Dec. 28, 1980 | Rendlesham Forest Incident | GB, Woodbridge (Suffolk) | Triangle, light sphere, discus | 5+ | CE-2, CE-3 |
| 19 March 1986 | Official UFO night of Brazil | Brazil, and the Rio de Janeiro / São Paulo region | Light ball, 21 | 4+ | RV |
| 17 November 1986 | Japan Airlines flight 1628 | United States, Alaska | Rectangle, 2 / ball, 1 | 3 | CE-2 |
| 29 Nov. 1989 - Apr. 1990 | Belgian UFO wave | Belgium , whole country | Triangle, mainly | 10,000+ | CE-1, CE-2 |
| 24 August 1990 | Greifswald objects | Germany, Greifswald Bodden | Light ball, several | 100+ | NL |
| 16 September 1994 | Ariel school meeting | Zimbabwe, Ruwa | Flying saucer, two beings | 62 (children) | CE 3 |
| 13 March 1997 | Phoenix Lights | United States, Phoenix (Arizona) | V-shaped object | 100+ | CE-1 |
Short description of selected UFO incidents [ Edit | Edit source ]
A brief description of cases that do not have their own lemma in Wikipedia.Tehran incident [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 18 September 1976 | Place: | Tehran , Tehran Province , Iran | Object (s): | several light balls | witnesses: | more than 5 | Classification: | NL / CE-2 |
In addition to statements by Major Parwis Jaafari and Hossein Pirouzi, this case is documented by a report by the US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Representatives of the DIA were present during debriefing and were able to speak with the witnesses and superiors. [1] [2]
investigations
- The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, today's Committee for Skeptical Inquiry), with the investigator Philip J. Klass , investigated the case. Thus, the bright light seen through Teheran was the planet Saturn . The training of the pilots and the military personnel of the Iranian Air Force was very bad at this time and the pilots were under heavy stress because of the nightly alarm start. According to Klass, their statements are therefore doubtful. The radar contact of the second jet is attributable to expectation and incompetence for Klass. From Iranian newspaper reports, Klass (deviating from the testimony of the witnesses) reconstructs the fact that the first interceptor had not returned from technical problems, but because of another small object that had passed the jet. For fear, the pilot was then reversed. The system failures of the second F-4 interceptor are due to the generally poor maintenance condition and have nothing to do with the sighting. The smaller objects were probably Boliden according to class . In the days before the event, there were several reports of UFO sightings in the Iranian press. This would have favored a misinterpretation of the stimuli. [3] [4]
- An official investigation is not known. However, a document of the US Defense Intelligence Agency has been released by the Freedom of Information Act . The DIA summarizes the case and statements of the pilots, radarists and superiors. In a review by the DIA, the case is referred to as "an outstanding report. This case is a classic which meets all the criteria for a valid study of the UFO phenomenon. " [1]
Official UFO Night of Brazil [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 19 March 1986 | Place: | Region of Rio de Janeiro / São Paulo , Brazil | Object (s): | up to 21 light balls | witnesses: | more than four | Classification: | RV |
At 22:55, Captain Viriato can capture an object in a Mirage by aircraft radar and trace it for a few minutes before it disappears from the radar. Viriato says later that the object would have flown zigzag according to radar. Visually Viriato could not make out the object. At 23:15 Leutnant Kleber, a pilot of an F-5E Tiger II , sees a lightball in front of his machine. His radar and ground radar show a contact at 19 kilometers from his jet. Glue sticks the object in the direction of the Atlantic, without having to catch it. At 23:20, Captain Jordão can make a red light in an F-5E and make radar contact to an object at 32 kilometers distance. Jordão follows the target a few minutes, until the target disappears simultaneously from the viewpoint and from the radar. Later thirteen objects from the ground radar are located close to the jet. They accompany the jet for a few minutes, without Jordão seeing the targets. Only after a 180 ° turn do the objects disappear. Against 1:00 all objects have disappeared and the jets landed again. [5] [6]
Four days later, on 23 May 1986, Brazilian aviation minister, Octavio Moreira Lima, convened a press conference with responsible military personnel as well as the pilots of the military machinery involved. Lima confirms the incident and reports: "For several minutes our jets were followed by these objects. [...] And the explanation? We can not give you any since we do not have any. " [7] Therefore, the incident is called" Official UFO Night. " Minister Lima announces to publish an official investigation report within 30 days. This announcement was not complied with, such a report never published. [8] Only in 2009 was a secret internal investigation of the events released to the public. [See investigations below]
investigations
- Werner Walter of the CENAP suspects radar errors in the context of the astrologers' mistakes. Walter points out that the radar-recorded UFOs could either not be observed visually, and when observed, had similarities to inversion- starred stars and planets. According to Walter, the coordinates of the radar location and the location of the visual sighting were often not matched, which would support this interpretation. [9]
- The British space expert, Geoffrey Perry, points out that the Soviet Space Station Saljut 7 has spent some time in the earth's atmosphere on garbage in the Brazil region. This could have been the trigger for the sightings, according to Perry. [10]
- Experts from the Brazilian Air Force contradict these statements. José Carlos Pereira, four- star brigadge general and commander of the Air Security Command from 1999 to 2001, rejects guesses about radar errors. He states that by "mutually confirming different radar systems, which run on different frequencies," a measurement error or a falsely correlation can be excluded ". [8] Jose Pessoa Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, a brigadier and head of the Air Force's internal investigation into the incident, argues that the space shuttle does not correspond to the recorded movement patterns of the objects, and therefore to declare it as an explanation. [11]
- An internal investigation of the Brazilian Air Force on June 2, 1986 was released to the public. The report notes that the registered phenomenon has been detected by different radar systems, has shown different speeds (from hover to high speed), has the ability to have sudden acceleration, deceleration and sharp directional changes, as well as timed in different colors. The Luftwaffe's leadership comes to the conclusion that "the phenomenon was a solid which, by its ability to follow the observer, to keep a distance and to fly into formation, has shown intelligent behavior." This is not necessarily the case manned vehicles. " An explanation for the phenomenon is not given. [6]
Japan Airlines Flight 1628 [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 17 November 1986 | Place: | Alaska , United States | Object (s): | two rectangles with lights, a great sphere | witnesses: | 3 | Classification: | CE-2 |
All three crew members of Flight 1628 confirmed this statement. The case became known in the media weeks later and then aroused great media interest. [13] [14]
investigations
- The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, Federal Aviation Administration ) has opened an investigation on January 1, 1987, just two months after the incident. The result was announced on 5 March 1987. According to this, the FAA was "unable to confirm the incident" ("what unable to confirm the event"). The radar contacts are explained as "uncorrected primary and secondary contacts" where the actual position of the aircraft (primary contact) and that of the aircraft transponder signal (secondary contact ) are not synchronous and therefore display two targets on the radar screen. To the sightings of the crew, the FAA simply declares that the FAA does not carry out any investigations into UFO sightings. [15]
- The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, now Committee for Skeptical Inquiry ) published the following explanation with the investigator Philip J. Klass : The sighting of the first two luminous objects were ice crystals, which reflected the moonlight. After the plane has passed the ice crystals, the crew has sought the supposedly missing UFO and discovered the planet Jupiter . This was then held for the big UFO. The radar contacts are due to thin cloudbanks. (A previous statement by CSICOP has been withdrawn and replaced) [16]
- Investigators like the physicist Bruce Maccabee contradict both the FAA publication and the statements of CSICOP. Both explanations would ignore various points of the description, such as the described form of objects, intensity of light, sensed heat on the skin, and movement patterns of the objects. Maccabee does not agree with the radar analysis of the FAA. The incident remains unclear according to Maccabee. [14]
- John Callahan, Accidents Division Director, FAA's Evaluation and Investigations Division from 1981 to 1988, reported several years after his retirement from the FAA investigation into this incident. According to him, all the data on the case were presented at a meeting staff of the CIA and the Scientific Advisory Board of the US President. At the end of the approximately 90-minute meeting, the staff of CIA and the consultancy staff were very interested in the incident. According to Callahan, all stakeholders were committed to secrecy about the meeting and the incident, on the grounds of not wanting to panic among the population. The official FAA analysis of the radar data is deliberately wrong in order to conceal the seriousness of the incident. Other witnesses or official statements confirming Callahan's statements are not known. [12]
Greifswald objects [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 24 August 1990 | Place: | Greifswalder Bodden , Germany | Object (s): | several light balls | witnesses: | over 100 | Classification: | NL |
The objects swayed slightly, but remained motionless. On the films, small light flashes can be seen from time to time. At least once one of the groups was extinguished and then dived again about a minute later elsewhere. Whether this happened several times is controversial. Even if there have been isolated flight movements of the light balls is controversial. Thus a witness reported, "smaller objects flew away from the formations, stopped for a short time and flew back into them". Consensus is that the last items went out around 9:00 pm.
The Greifswald objects are the most famous UFO incident in German territory. [17] [18]
investigations
_7_conduct_a_live_fire_demonstration_with_their_M2_machine_guns_during_the_battalion%27s_unit_field_exercise_(FEX).jpg)
- The UFO clubs CENAP and GWUP see in the incident a military exercise of the Warsaw Pact . The explanation states that light balls have been launched into the air as targets for infrared missiles or similar missiles. These targets would then float on parachutes for several minutes and show the corresponding lighting behavior. The bullets had lit a maximum of 10 minutes and were then replaced by new targets. There were no air movements, but bullets that try to reach the targets. This statement is also based on the statements of a former NVA officer who has wanted to participate in similar exercises. [17]
- Dennis Kirstein of Ufo-Informationen.de also suspects a military exercise of the Warsaw Pact, but not the navy but the Luftwaffe. According to Kirstein, there are numerous indications that airborne bombs were deployed by the Czechoslovak Air Force as an exercise target. Here too, the luminaries burned for about 10 minutes and were then replaced by new luminaries. [19]
- Some researchers, such as the UFO research associations MUFON-CES and DEGUFO, contradict the explanations of exercise objectives . The bullets would have been in the sky for much longer than 10 minutes and therefore could not be an exercise goal because there are no such long-burning targets. Moreover, the flight movements reported by some witnesses contradict the explanation of exercise targets on parachutes. [20] [21]
Ariel School Encounter [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 16 September 1994 | Place: | Ruwa , Mashonaland East , Zimbabwe | Object (s): | metallic object on the ground, two beings | witnesses: | 62 (children) | Classification: | CE 3 |
The students reported that they had run to the presumed site. The description of the children is consistent in the essential points: Behind the group of trees, a large, round, metallic object in the form of a flying saucer floated or hovered above the ground. It was a being at the object, a second had risen out of the object. The beings were described as small, dressed in a kind of black jumpsuit , pale facial, large black, oval eyes, and long black hair. The beings had not spoken. However, some children said they had received words that criticized the environmental disasters caused by humanity. Many of the students were afraid and had run back to the school building, where they had informed the teachers. Teachers described the children's behavior as panicky. The object will be lifted again after a short time. When teachers arrived at the site, there were no signs of the object or for a landing. In various details about the appearance of the object, the appearance of the beings, or the course of the encounter, the students' statements differed. [22]
investigations
- An initial investigation was carried out on 20 September 1994 by the journalist Cynthia Hind. This made the students draw up drawings and conducted interviews with the children, teachers and parents. It comes to the conclusion that the children are not lying and their statements are consistent with imaginations. The reports are based on Hind's assessment of a real event. [22]
- The most famous study was conducted by the psychiatrist John E. Mack in November 1994 . He conducted interviews on two days on the spot and conducted interviews with twelve of the students. Mack concluded that the children "describe these experiences or events as a person who talks about something that has happened to her. [...] The whole quality and manner in which they talk about it: it is the way a person speaks about something that is contrary to it. " [23]
- In the course of research on the film documentation Encounter in Ruwa: The Ariel School UFO Sighting , the filmmaker Randall Nickerson interviewed many of the students once again in 2008. All the witnesses reiterated that they had really experienced the described. [24] [25]
Phoenix Lights [ Edit | Edit source ]
| Date: | 13 March 1997 | Place: | Phoenix , Arizona , United States | Object (s): | a large V-shaped object with strong lights | witnesses: | several hundred | Classification: | CE-1 |
The second sight wave begins around 22:00. Hundreds of witnesses see a row of bright, white lights over the Estrella Mountains southwest of Phoenix. The lights appeared briefly one after the other, hovering on the spot and extinguished 4-5 minutes later. From this event, there are several video films and photos. [29]
The case was initially only noticed in some local newspapers. It was only through an article of the USA Today on June 18, 1997, more than ten weeks after the event, that the case became more or less widely known. [30] In 2007, the incident once again attracted the public interest: The governor of Arizona at the time of the incident, Fife Symington III. , stated in an interview that he had observed the alleged object himself. Symington said he had seen a "huge, delta-shaped" object, which, according to him, could not be derived from humans. At a press conference immediately after the incident, Symington had made a significant contribution to ridicule the incident by presenting his policeman as an "alien costume" in an alien costume. [31]
investigations
The Luke Air Force Base has announced that at 10:00 pm so-called flares of military aircraft have been dropped for exercise purposes. Most investigators agree that the second sight wave is due to these flares from around 22:00, so all published photos and videos show these flares. [28] The further investigations refer therefore only to the first sighting wave from 20:15 to 21:00 clock.
- Some skeptical investigators, such as the CENAP group and the podcast magazine Skeptoid.com, consider the testimonies of the first vision wave to be unbelievable and negligible as there is no photographic evidence for them. Only the videos and photos are reassuring - and these show flares. It is therefore to be assumed that nothing else than flares have caused the sightings. [32] [33]
- Many skeptical investigators suspect a formation of military aircraft as an explanation. Mitch Stanley, an amateur astronomer from Scottsdale , reported that he had also seen the lights and observed through his Dobson telescope . He claims to have clearly recognized aircraft as a source of lights. The time when Stanley made his observation is not published, but the sighting is often given as an explanation for the first sighting wave. According to this, a formation of military aircraft had flown the route of the alleged UFO into V-formation. Observers would have mistakenly interpreted a coherent object from the position lights of the aircraft. Thus the white and red position lights of airplanes fit into the often reported colors of the lights on the object. [28] [34]
- An official investigation is not known. According to Fife Symington III. , Governor of Arizona 1991 to 1997, the Governor's Office investigated the origin of the flight object. It was submitted to the Department of Public Safety , the Air National Guard and the Luke Air Force Base . According to Symington, these questions have not been answered. Frances Emma Barwood, the councilor of the council, who has worked for an investigation, reports the same. Even according to their statement, the authorities have not cooperated. [31] [26]
Single Signature [ Edit | Edit source ]
- ↑ Jump to: a B Denis Letty, Jean-Jacques Vélasco, Bernard Norlain, among others: UFOs and Defense: What Should We Prepare For? In: COMETA (eds.): VSD (magazine) . PrismaMEDIA, July 16, 1999 ISSN 1278-916X , pp 15-16 ( Part 1 [PDF; 773 kB; accessed on 25 April 2012] French: Les OVNI et la Défense: À quoi devons-nous nous préparer? Main source for the case description). , ( Part 2 [PDF, 1.2 MB]).
- Jump up ↑ Parwis Dschafari: Air raid over Tehran . In: Leslie Kean (Hrsg.): UFOs generals, pilots and government representatives break their silence . 1st edition. Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2012, ISBN 978-3-86445-025-9 , pages 96-102 (English: UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record Translated by Helmut Kunkel, main source of statements by Jafari.) ,
- High Jump ↑ Philip J. Class: UFOs: The Public Deceived . Prometheus Books, 1986, ISBN 0-87975-322-6 (English).
- High Jumping ↑ Werner Walter: Old Story: UFO-Luftkampf im Reich des Schahs? In: Centrales' research network of exceptional heavenly phenomena. 7 May 2007 , retrieved on April 26, 2012 .
- High Jump ↑ Don Berliner: UFO Briefing Document . Random House Publishing Group, 2000, ISBN 0-440-23638-X ( ufoevidence.org [accessed on October 31, 2012] Main source for expiration description).
- ↑ Jump to: a b Jose Pessoa Cavalcanti de Albuquerque: Occurrence Report . Ministry of Aeronautics / Air Command of Air Defense. 2 June 1986 ( ufoinfo.com [PDF; 67 kB; obtained on 31 October 2012] Portuguese: Relatório de Ocorrências Document No 008 / CMDO / C-138).
- High Jumping ↑ Octavio Moreira Lima: The Official UFO night in Brazil - 1986 (ENG subs). Brazilian TV report on the press conference of 23 May 1986. In: youtube.com. CBPU - Centro brasileiro de pesquisas ufológicas, 23 May 1986 , obtained on 31 October 2012 (Portuguese, from minute 6:20): "For many minutes our crafts were followed by these objects [...] But the answer? We can not give you, since we do not have one. "
- ↑ High jump to: a b José Carlos Pereira: UFOs in Brazil . In: Leslie Kean (Hrsg.): UFOs generals, pilots and government representatives break their silence . 1st edition. Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2012, ISBN 978-3-86445-025-9 , pp. 211-220 (English: UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials .
- Hochspringen ↑ Werner Walter: Where do the celestial globos of Luminosos remain as a heavenly fire from space? In: CENAP - NEWSTICKER. CENAP, August 12, 2010 , retrieved on October 31, 2012 : "Radar perceptions and visually-visible" UFOs "(with strong similarity to just nothing more than planets and stars under inversion viewing conditions distorted [...]) do not match what is obviously the real reason for the whole mess was tense and thrilled in mutually contagious virulent UFO virus hysteria effect. "
- High Jump ↑ Sasjkia Otto: UFO Files: top 10 UFO sightings. In: The Telegraph. 17 August 2009 retrieved on October 31, 2012 (English): "Geoffrey Perry, a British space researcher, attributed the incident to debris thatwere ejected by Soviet space station Salyut-7 and re-entered Earth's atmosphere around central-western Brazil . "
- High Jumping Antonio Huneeus: UFO Alert in Brazil . In: UFO Review . New York 1986 (English): "A metallic box with space debris can be. That was not the case of what was seen in Brazil, where the objects had changed, according to Don Berliner: UFO Briefing Document . Random House Publishing Group, 2000, ISBN 0-440-23638-X ( ufoevidence.org ).
- ↑ Jump to: a b John Callahan: The FAA investigates a UFO incident that "never took place" . In: Leslie Kean (Hrsg.): UFOs generals, pilots and government representatives break their silence . 1st edition. Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2012, ISBN 978-3-86445-025-9 , pp. 235-242 (English: UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials .
- High Jump ↑ Airline crew lake UFO mother ship . Controller, radar confirm object; smaller ships also followed 747. In: Telegraph Herald . 150th Year, No. 310. Dubuque, Iowa & East Dubuque, Illinois December 31, 1986, p. 1 ( news.google.com [accessed on May 3, 2012]).
- ↑ High jump to: a b Bruce Maccabee: The Fantastic Flight Of JAL 1628 . In: International UFO Reporter . Volume 12, No. 2 (March / April), 1987 ( ufoevidence.org [retrieved on May 3, 2012]).
- Hochspringen ↑ Paul Steucke: FAA Releases Documents on Reported UFO Sighting Last November . Edited by: Office of Public Affairs, Alaskan Region, Federal Aviation Administration [FAA], US Department of Transport. Anchorage, March 5, 1987 ( russhaywood.com [PDF; 160 kB; retrieved on May 3, 2012]).
- High Jumping ↑ Philip J. Class: FAA Data Sheds New Light on JAL Pilot's UFO Report . In: The Skeptical Inquirer . Vol. 12, No. 1. Buffalo, NY 1987. *** "
- ↑ Jump to: a b Werner Walter: The UFO phenomenon of Greifswald - A German classic . In: Skeptics . No. 4, 1999 ( online ).
- High Jump ↑ Illobrand von Ludwiger: The state of UFO research . 4th edition. Second Edition, Frankfurt am Main 1994, ISBN 3-86150-057-4 , p. 85 et seq.
- High Jumping ↑ Dennis Kirstein: The Lights of Greifswald - Ufo-Riddle vs. Ifo solution. December 2, 2012 , accessed December 3, 2012 (PDF, 1.6 MB).
- High Jump ↑ Illobrand von Ludwiger: The luminous balls at Greifswald. Mutual UFO Network - Central European Society, 2000 , accessed April 23, 2012 .
- High jumping ↑ Andreas Müller: Controversy: UFO skeptics declare again "Greifswald-UFOs" for solved - UFO researchers contradict. In: gre.wi-current. November 28, 2012 , obtained on December 3, 2012 .
- ↑ Jump to: a b Cynthia Hind: Ufos Over Africa . 1st edition. Horus House Press, Madison, Wisconsin 1997, ISBN 1-881852-15-6 , pp. 217 ff. (English, main source for the expiry of the case).
- High Jumping ↑ Stephane Allix: Experiencer . 13ème RUE, NBC-Universal Channel & BONNE PIOCHE, 2004 (english, youtube.com ( Memento from December 6, 2012 in the Internet Archive ) - TV documentation, quoted from minute 24).
- High Jumping Stephen Coan: The day the aliens landed . In: The Witness . Pietermaritzburg April 16, 2008 (English, johnemackinstitute.org [PDF; available on April 23, 2012]).
- Jump up ↑ Project page "Encounter in Ruwa: The Ariel School UFO Sighting". John E. Mack Institute, obtained on April 23, 2012 (English, movie is still in production and not yet released).
- ↑ Jump to: a b Leslie Kean: Governor Fife Symington - Steps to Change . In: UFOs generals, pilots and government representatives break their silence . 1st edition. Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2012, ISBN 978-3-86445-025-9 , pages 260-262 (English: UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On the Record Translated by Helmut Kunkel.).
- High Jump ↑ Richard Price: Arizonans say the truth about UFO is out there . In: USA Today . March 18, 1997 ( ufosnw.com [PDF, 1.4 MB, accessed on 3 May 2012] The main source for testimonies).
- ↑ High jump to: a b c Tony Ortega: The Phoenix Lights Explained (Again). In: eSkeptic. The Skeptics Society, May 21, 2008 , retrieved on May 7, 2012 (English, main source for expiration).
- High Jumping ↑ Bruce Maccabee: Report On Phoenix Light Arrays. In: Bruce Maccabee Research Website. September 30, 1998 , retrieved on May 7, 2012 (English).
- High Jumping ↑ Peter B. Davenport: Summary of "Phoenix Lights" Event. In: National UFO Reporting Center. Archived by the original , retrieved on May 7, 2012 (English): "Another interesting aspect of the case is the virtual absence of coverage in the print media, save for a handful of articles in local newspapers. [...] It was not until mid-June, almost ten weeks later, that the national press took any interest in the incident with the appearance of a front-page article in USA Today on June 18, 1997. "
- ↑ Jump to: a b Fife Symington III: A correct position . In: Leslie Kean (Hrsg.): UFOs generals, pilots and government representatives break their silence . 1st edition. Kopp Verlag, Rottenburg 2012, ISBN 978-3-86445-025-9 , pp. 275-276 (in German: UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On the Record, Translated by Helmut Kunkel).
- High Jump ↑ Werner Walter: CENAP Report. No. 287, December 2003. In: CENAP Report. December 2003 , p.44 retrieved on May 8, 2012 (PDF, 1.5 MB): "[...] roughly V-shaped suspension of flares hanging static over a military training area. [...] In the aftermath, a few people would have seen a huge, V-shaped object with a gray-metallic wall, and with which the recorded lights were located. [...] Obviously, there is once again a psychologically-conditioned "alienation potential", which in this case also intersected with some UFO idealists. "
- High Jumping ↑ Brian Dunning: The Alien Invasion of Phoenix, Arizona. In: Skeptoid # 41. April 26, 2007 , retrieved on May 8, 2012 (English, Podcast transcript): "The only other dissenting evidence is the mass of eyewitness accounts. Unfortunately all such stories are in direct contradiction with all the photographic evidence. [...] The Phoenix Lights were flares. Deal with it. "
- High Jumping ↑ Tony Ortega: The Great UFO Cover-up. In: Phoenix NewTimes. 26 June 1997 , retrieved on 7 May 2012 (English).
Web Links [ Edit | Edit source ]
- UFO Evidence - A site with different UFO incidents, photos and articles on the subject.
- The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry - Discusses the UFO phenomenon critically and has published statements on many UFO sightings.
