My timeline is related to FOIA requests, and more, made to, and ignored by: 1] the Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Mr. M. JUKES and 2] the entity known as G4S PLC [who run “security” in the relevant prisons Mr. MAURICE KIRK is connected to in this matter: HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc]. These 2 subjects, as the timeline below shows, were asked, via a formal F.O.I.A. [S.A.R. / DPA request for a copy of this letter – authored by Maurice Kirk and meant to be sent to myself – which was stopped from leaving HMP Cardiff by the G4S prison employees and/or SWP as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] [referring to the charge M KIRK was remanded in custody regarding]. This withheld letter obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself, along with other letters to others [at least one other, whereby the charge was later dropped too after M KIRK’s remand in HMP on the strength of these “noxious letters”, which did not have any “noxious substance” attached to them eg. anthrax, or in the case of former MP Mr. A. Cairn’s letter, which was supposed to have “heroin” attached to it – the charge pertaining to that, which also enforced the custodial remand of Maurice Kirk, being dropped also at a later date. I requested too any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons in 2019, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not. As can be seen from the timeline, everything has been ignored by each government department contacted. After the alotted period of time had passed for these FOIA requests to be responded to, which they weren’t by either the SWP, or G4S, the INFORMATION COMMISSIONER’S OFFICE [I.C.O.] was contacted, and a formal complaint was made regarding these 2 entity’s refusals to act regarding the statutes in place regarding the formal F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. requests made to them. However, the I.C.O. refused to deal with my formal complaint to them, so a complaint was made about everything to the Secretary of State for Justice – Mr. Robert Buckland, at the Ministry of Justice, London [MoJ]. The “Disclosure Team” at the MoJ responded, at first, replying with my original FOIA request to SWP, but then prevaricated, asking at first for my ID, which was immediately sent to them, but then, amazingly, they replied again asking what I wanted with them, even though I -AND THEY – had sent the original FOIA request made to the SWP Chief Constable which I had included in my original notification to Mr. Buckland. After the failure of SWP’s Chief Constable to respond to the FOIA request, originally made in September 2019, a formal request for an INTERNAL REVIEW was made to SWP – a request to investigate this non-compliance by this SWP to ignore a formal FOIA request. However, this request for an “Internal Review” into SWP’s non-actions was also wholly ignored also by them, so a formal complaint was made to the “tiger with no teeth” the “Independant Office for Police Conduct” – the IOPC – who promptly passed my complaint of malfeasance by SWP back to – guess who? – the SWP themselves – the very entity gulity of so much malfeasance already, and regarding not only FOIA requests. The IOPC passed my complaint onto the SWP “Professional Standards” – we are not holding our breath waiting for them to respond and do their jobs with due diligance and responsibility. So, no responses from anyone anywhere, including the Sectretary of State for Justice himself, regarding the rules THEY THEMSELVES MADE [re: FOIA requests], but refuse to comply by!
These cases are ongoing, need I add?TIMELINE [minus relavent attachments]:
June 23 2020 – complete email thread re: contact from SWP’s “name redacted” asking re: “M. Kirk” is at the very bottom of the list shown as number: 2September 17 2020 – FOIA request to SWP M. JUKES [attached]September 21 – acknowledgement letter from J JENKINS, Disclosure officer of SWP [JUKES] telling me to go to G4S, not SWP [attached]Sept. 26 – sent INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST to SWP – [sent by email – see below]Sept. 28 – acknowledgement email from SWP re: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST – [sent by email – see below]Sept. 28 – FOIA request to G4S – [identical FOIA request as to SWP [M JUKES – see attmts. 1,2]Sept. 30 – acknowledgement letter from G4S to FOIA request [attached]October 26 – reminder email to SWP re: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST [see below in email thread]October 30 – ditto Oct. 26 aboveNovember 02 – SWP acknowledgement to Oct. 26 + 30 emails re: INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST ignoring by SWP [see below in email thread]November 18 – letter to Mr. Robert Buckland, Secretary of State for Justice MoJ, UK, re: ignoring by all of FOIA request [attached]December 04 – acknowledgement letter from MoJ re: FOIA requests ignored by SWP, G4S, + ICO [attached]December 10 – MoJ write again re: the FOIA request“Disclosure Team <email@example.com>Thu 10/12/2020 12:01
Dear Mr Graham,
Thank you for your email and providing your proof of identity.
In order to process your request you would have to clarify what information you are requesting as well as the search location as outlined in our previous letter.
Disclosure Team, Information Services
Follow us on Twitter @MoJGovUK
This was replied to immediately with details of the original F.O.I.A. request to SWales police, et al. Nothing has been heard of, to date, 28 Dec. 2020.
December 15 – formal complaint to IOPC re: SWP ignoring INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST orig. Sept. 26 [see email directly below the December 22 2020 reply from the I.O.P.C.]December 22 2020 – formal reply from I.O.P.C. [directly below under "TIMELINE ENDS" 22 December 2021] to my December 15 2020 complaint to them re: SWP ignoring INTERNAL REVIEW REQUEST [see December 15 update, directly above] stating my complaint has been passed onto the Prof. Standards of SWales police.
Jan. 06 2021: SWP Prof. Standards send message stating “complaint” is upheld” but that “no further action will be taken” and say to go back to the IOPC – who were contacted in the first place re: this complaint.
Jan 12 2021: SWP letter, dated 11 Jan. 2021[below] states no cooperation from SWP re: the withheld letter that is causing so much malfeasance on their part as they try and dismiss perfectly reasonable demands for a copy of this letter, in total accord with the law, meant to be sent to myself but withheld by staff / police in HMP Cardiff in May 2019 whilst it's author, Maurice Kirk, was remanded into custody in HMP in 2020 partly as a result of this letter "with a noxious substance" attached to it's rear side before the charge was dismissed, leaving the final "stalking an MP" charge remaining and due for jury trial in May 2021! The actual number of letters sent by MK to MPs etc. during that specific time period throughout this matter is an ongoing and ever changing amount depending on when the statement is made.
TIME LINE ENDS with the response from SWP Professional Standards [above] after the I.O.P.C. passed on my complaint to them re: the failure by the SWP to respond to my complaint regarding the SWP Chief Constable’s refusal to act re: my request for an Internal Review, etc.]!enquiries <firstname.lastname@example.org>Tues 22/12/2020 07.58December 22 2020Dear Mr GrahamThank you for contacting the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 15 December 2020 regarding your complaint against South Wales Police. The case reference number is 2020/146918, which you should quote in all future correspondence.We are completely independent of the police service and are responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly.Our role is to forward your complaint to the relevant police force, which must decide whether to record the complaint. Recording means that a record is made of the complaint giving it formal status as a complaint under the Police Reform Act 2002.I have passed the matter to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of South Wales Police. You should usually hear from the PSD within 15 working days. However, given the current corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic it may take longer for the PSD to be in contact. Please contact them directly if you have not had a response from them.South Wales Police
Professional Standards Department
Ty Richard Thomas
Brackla Industrial Estate
CF31 2DATel: 01656 655 555If you have any further information you wish to pass on, please forward it directly to the above address.I have attached some further information on the complaints process for your attention.Yours sincerelyredacted
Customer Contact AdvisorIndependent Office for Police Conduct
PO Box 473SaleM33 0BWTwitter: @policeconductwww.policeconduct.gov.uk [ends]———————————————————————–
On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, 4:04 am butlin cat, <email@example.com> wrote:15 December 2020Dear I.O.P.C.,I wish to make a formal complaint about SOUTH WALES POLICE’s failure to comply with my request for an Internal Review pertaining to the Chief Constable Mr. M. JUKES failure to comply with my FOIA [SAR] / DPA request [which is attached: attachments 1,2, should’ve been dated 17 Sept. 2020, and updated with a clearer version, sent shortly after on and dated the 28 Sept. 20: attachments 3,4].The acknowledgement message from SWP regarding my request is shown below, dated the 28 September.SWP have misled me throughout regarding this Internal Review requested by myself, stating in their last email, directly below, dated 02 Nov. 2020 that they would “be in touch with me” after my request dragged on and on – but of course they didn’t respond in any shape or form and their statement is completely false, and in reality SWP are ignoring my Internal Request throughout.SWP also ignored my initial FOIA request, attached [attachments 1,2], which caused my request for the Internal Review in the first place and the MoJ are currently dealing with this malfeasance regarding the SWP’s deliberate ignoring the UK Governments rules in place regarding formal FOIA [SAR] / DPA requests made to them.I complain regarding this blatant malfeasance by these public servants SOUTH WALES POLICE regarding their ignoring of the Internal Review request originally sent to SWP, dated the 26 September 2020, the message shown below, and acknowledged by SWP on the 28 September 2020 – that acknowledgement shown below too.Thank you for your time.Mr. J. Graham – concerned citizen[redacted]……………………………………………………………..
Sent: 02 November 2020 09:55
To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: F.A.O. MS. MORGAN, SWP Fw: INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr Graham
Thank you for your e-mail. I am sorry no-one has made contact with you about this. Please bear with me whilst I make some enquiries and I will come back to you as soon as I can.
30 October 2020
To: Mr. M. Jukes, Chief Constable, and Ms. [redacted], P.A. to Mr. M. Jukes, Chief Constable, SWP,
Please see, yet again, my unanswered message, directly below, regarding the INTERNAL REVIEW that you acknowledge in your message to me of the 28 Sept. 2020, also below.
From: butlin cat <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, 26 October 2020, 09:28
Subject: INTERNAL REVIEW
26 October 2020
Dear Ms. [redacted], SWP,
Can you please tell me what’s happening regarding the “Internal Review” I am told was underway via your message of the 28 Sept. 2020 [below] re: the refusal of my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / DPA request already sent to Mr. Jukes? It is now the 26th October 2020.
J. Graham concerned citizen
Sent: Monday, 28 September 2020, 11:04
Subject: RE: F.A.O. MR. M. JUKES: – INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr Graham
I write to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail dated 26th September. Your request for a review is being reviewed and we will be in touch with you in due course.
PA to the Chief Constable
From: Mr. J. Graham, redacted
To: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales, CF31 3SU
26 September 2020
REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr. Jukes,
Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. [redacted], a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.
It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself [amongst others] written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.
I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.
For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:
” Sent: 18 September 2020 10:59
To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: F.A.O.: Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, S. Wales police – Update to my F.O.I.A. / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request
TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales, CF31 3SU
FROM: Mr. J. G. Graham, ————
18 September 2020
UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:
Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:
Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:
Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, at present residing at [redacted] was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:
” attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019″
Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.
My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.
The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “redacted” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class. My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.
signed: J. Graham redacted [ends]
My request is connected to = Case Reference no. T20200177 at Exeter Crown Court – pertaining to Mr. MAURICE KIRK, d.o.b. 12/03/1945 , of Taunton, Somerset, UK.
From: redactedSent: 29 September 2020 11:34Subject: RE: –Thank you for your replyPC xxxx ———–IST Hub / Hwb ISTCardiff Bay Police Station / Gorsaf Heddlu Bae CaerdyddJames Street / Stryd JamesCardiff Bay / Bae CaerdyddCardiff / CaerdyddCF10 5EWContact Number / Rhif Estyniad: Direct Dial – 02920338424 or 01656 869211 Ext 34388Email / E-bost: redacted————————————————————————————————————–below are all the messages [2 of them: 23 June + 06 July 20 – the 3rd received 11 weeks later 29 Sept. 20 is above] received from [redacted], with my reply to the 1st mess from them only – note the 2nd message of 06 July from SWP, asking for a “statement”, was not replied to:
From: redactedSent: 06 July 2020 13:08Subject: StatementGood afternoon Mr Graham,With regards to your previous email confirming your relationship with Mr Maurice Kirk and the fact that you had not received any mail containing a white powder, would you be prepared to provide a statement containing those details and your knowledge of a white powder discovered within letters that you believe to be toothpaste.Regards—————-PC xxxx ——————–IST Hub / Hwb ISTCardiff Bay Police Station / Gorsaf Heddlu Bae CaerdyddJames Street / Stryd JamesCardiff Bay / Bae CaerdyddCardiff / CaerdyddCF10 5EWContact Number / Rhif Estyniad: Direct Dial – 02920338424 or 01656 869211 Ext 34388Mobile – redactedEmail / E-bost: redactedYdych chi angen siarad gyda’r heddlu ond nad oes angen ymateb brys arnoch? Ffoniwch 101? Gellir defnyddio’r rhif i roi gwybod am achos nad yw’n un brys i unrhyw heddlu yng Nghymru a Lloegr.Mewn argyfwng, ffoniwch 999 bob amser.Do you need to speak to police but don’t require an emergency response? Call 101? The number can be used to report a non-emergency to any force in Wales and England.In an emergency, always dial 999.Mae Heddlu De Cymru yn croesawu derbyn gohebiaeth yn Gymraeg a Saesneg. Byddwn yn ateb gohebiaeth a dderbynnir yn Gymraeg yn Gymraeg ac ni fydd gohebu yn Gymraeg yn arwain at oedi.South Wales Police welcomes receiving correspondence in Welsh and English. Any correspondence received in Welsh will be answered in Welsh and corresponding in Welsh will not lead to—————————————————————————————————-
On Wednesday, 24 June 2020, 01:32:58 BST, butlin cat <email@example.com> wrote:Dear Ms. ——————-,In answer to your enquiry I can confirm I know Maurice Kirk as an acquaintance more than a friend.I must add I have never received any letter from him with anything resembling a “white powder” attached to it. I understand that this “white powder” in question, after formal forensic investigation, proved to be common toothpaste.I hope this helps.Thank you,J. Graham—————————————————————————————–
From: redactedSent: 23 June 2020 20:58Subject: RE: –Good evening sir,Thank you for contacting me. The local officers attended your address at my request to establish if a J Graham esquire still lived there and if so to pass on my contact details.The reason for my enquiry is to ask you if a male by the name of Mr Maurice KIRK is known to you. A letter addressed to a J Graham found to contain an unknown white powder was seized at HMP Cardiff but my initial enquiries via the Royal Mail post code checking application did not match the addressed envelope.The letter was seized as a precautionary safety matter as this was not the first letter that Mr Kirk had addressed to someone containing an unknown white powder.I would be grateful if you wold confirm if Mr Maurice Kirk is known to you and in what capacity i.e. a personal friend or a relative for example.I hope that officers attending your address did not cause you any alarm or inconvenience.Regards——————-PC redactedIST Hub / Hwb ISTCardiff Bay Police Station / Gorsaf Heddlu Bae CaerdyddJames Street / Stryd JamesCardiff Bay / Bae CaerdyddCardiff / CaerdyddCF10 5EWContact Number / Rhif Estyniad: Direct Dial – 02920338424 or 01656 869211 Ext 34388Email / E-bost: redacted——————————————————————————————————–
From: butlin cat <firstname.lastname@example.org>Sent: 23 June 2020 20:26To: redactedSubject: –To redacted2 local police just called and told me you wished to speak with me.Please can you tell me what you want?J. Graham.
Archive continues [from 2011]:
Maurice’s site is “Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police” https://www.mauricejohnkirk.com
—-> see the latest posts from Maurice Kirk [www.mauricejohnkirk.com]:
The trial for this alleged and highly discerned subject is planned for May 2021 at Exeter Crown Court, and a clue to what it's all about, [Alfie]: the "noxious substance" attached to letters from MK he was charged with attempting to send [3 of them] whilst he was in HMP Cardiff, in May 2019 [or thereabouts] wasn't "anthrax" at all, but common toothpaste - the letters withheld immediately by the G4S screws [who, incidentally, are above prosecution and immune from prosecution - it sucks, doesn't it? considering their track record of assaults on MK and the denial of vital medication for weeks [Omerzaparole], + even vital + important preplanned hospital appointments and even court hearings were routinely denied him [all "alleged", of course] - the denied medication leaving him in such pain [via his "Barrett's Syndrome" stomach ailment] that he couldn't even walk, so they then gave him ONE CRUTCH, instead of two, or a BROKEN WHEELCHAIR to "help" him get around in the hellhole prison. MK's family got sent to him a new wheelchair [or 2] which immediately met with "problems", shall we say [identical to the wheelchair got for Gloria Musa, whose wheelchair was never given to her at all and disappeared in identical problematical circumstances when she was forced into prison]. Ever tried only using one crutch when you can't walk, and having to go up and down prison landing staircases to get food, etc? Such preplanned evil! The screws must've had a field day! Anyway, it wasn't "anthrax" [or "heroin"] at all on those letters, but common toothpaste, it being used in the desperate times to stick the piece of paper to his cell wall. Of course the sitting magistrate believed PC Plod's fairy stories regarding this nonsense, remanding MK into HMP immediately on hearing their sad tale, with MK subsequently banged up in prison for over 7 months as a result until judges saw the light and released him on a tag with multiple restrictions - curfew, residence restrictions etc. - all knocked out one by one after repeated bail application hearings in Exeter Crown earlier this year. Are you trying to tell me the screws didn't realise immediately it was toothpaste when stopping these letters, particularly as it had the distinctive smell, and anyway: where is MK going to get copious amounts of "anthrax" or "heroin" from, when in prison? [it was alleged former MP Alun Cairns received a letter with "heroin" attached, around the same time]. An obvious preplanned and manufactured set-up [allegedly, of course], enacted to thwart MK's existing cases in the courts re: his £million machine gun case [highly questionable] which has been ongoing - and thwarted and interfered with by the PTB - for years, especially because of the refusal by Welsh authorities to forward 20+ lever arch files containing damning evidence in MK's favour, especially the medical records from "Caswell Clinic"'s chief - regarding whom the "restraining order" [never served properly according to UK or any other laws] was connected to. Finally, after a 10 year [or more] battle, they had to relent and follow the judge's formal court order to release these files, finally, to MK recently, but more are owed that haven't been given.... The case continues,with gusto!! …The jury trial for this alleged and highly discernible subject of letters, but and more so the "stalking the MP" trial is planned for May 2021 at Exeter Crown Court - 2 of the 3 original charges from mid-2019 being dropped by the London CPS [who are running this show now, we are reliably informed] regarding the [alleged] letter with "heroin" on it to the former MP A. Cairns, and the [alleged] letter to myself with the "noxious substance on it likely to cause "grief etc." leaving the "stalking of the MP" charge remaining - wholly exaggerated, of course, and factually incorrect if the true facts / circumstances were known! Watch this space!!! Maurice is 76 and won't be here forever, and these characters have done a prize-winning job of stretching this case out to outrageous degrees - taking years to do something a few minutes would take ie. pressing a button on a computer to print the withheld files to forward to MK, the files requested since after the trial in 2009 whereby MK was acquitted, as the "dealing in machine guns" farcical charge was not only disgustingly fake, but the machine gun in question itself was tampered with [allegedly] by certain police-connected persons [allegedly, of course] - by being painted a different colour, for starters! The jury back then in 2009 took little time to find MK "not guilty" on the "dealing" charge, and that was the beginning, since, of years of untold harassment upon MK...with him having to spend at least valuable 5 years of his life in prison, on + off - since 2009, courtesy of these SWales police for the connected "breaching a restraining order" connected to the [blackmailed by cops, allegedly] consultant doctor [who ran "Caswell Clinic", whose name cannot even be mentioned online for fear of reprisals] who even left the NHS because of things [another story]. Now, all looks fine and dandy except that the restraining order WAS NEVER SERVED UPON MK ACCORDING TO UK or any other 3rd World LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE - a fact they've got away with when giving MK years upon years of prison sentences, time and again. Being forced to spend at least 5 years in prison out of 10 years since 2009 is, of course, totally unacceptable, I'm sure any reader with more than one atom of a brain will agree. SHAME ON THEM. These cases continue, if we all live that long, which we will!! [hopefully...].
Maurice had only been released from a lengthy sentence a matter of weeks when this pic below was taken, but little was it known that around 3 weeks later, in mid-February 2019, he would be hauled before the Welsh court again and charged with, yet again, the “breaching of a Restraining Order”, being forced yet again to serve yet another highly questionable sentence imposed by a Welsh “judge” pertaining to the a “Restraining Order” that was never served upon Maurice in the first place. For years this Welsh judiciary has got clean away with these utter “abuses of process” – and it’s long past time that a formal enquiry should be held into the criminality of the passing of these sentences on the very much targeted Maurice Kirk – jailed so many times wrongly!