butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

...hello + welcome!

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License..... For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

This blog is for regular updates + info connected to the ILLUMINATI, 911, 7/7, recent UFO sightings, CHEMTRAILS, MORGELLONS [98% OF WORLDS POPULATION HAS MORGELLONS DISEASE, they claim - see "Morgellons & SmartDust Infect Individuals to be Tracked via Satellite" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Baua4QzgAjc - MIND CONTROL {MK ULTRA, MANNEQUIN etc.}, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, JOHN LEAR, ALEX COLLIER, PROJECT CAMELOT, PROJECT AVALON, MICHAEL TSARION, JORDAN MAXWELL, PRESTON NICHOLS, AL BIELEK, STEWART SWERDELOW, DUNCAN CAMERON, WILLIAM COOPER, PHIL SCHNEIDER, David Wilcock, FRITZ SPRINGMEIER, BILLY MEIER, MAX IGAN, STEW WEBB, "Democracy Now!", Henry Makow, Linda Moulton-Howe, Dan Burisch, Webster Tarpley, Brother Nathanael, Timothy Good, Miles Johnson, Jim Marrs, John Hutchison, Wikileaks, Julian Assange #FreeAssange #FreeManning #FreeHammond, Dr. John Hall, Edward Snowden, Vladimir Putin, John Lennon, Bob Zimmerman [Dylan], award winning journalist John Pilger's site is www.johnpilger.com + many more who can only be described as heroes...

Like many, this site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they are since [from approx. 5000 views per day to 500]: "Shadowbanning" is the "act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community" - see more: What is "shadowbanning - truther sites are often targeted:

NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media ...

Targeted? victimised?...been dealt "rough justice"? see more: VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

my Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/butlincat

my Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/butlin.cat.9

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap" Galatians 6:7

......Namaste.....John Graham - butlincat

Jai guru deva om जय गुरुदेव ॐ ... peace!

frank zappa: “The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”

Tuesday, 31 August 2021

Shocking shenanigens from the "DISNEY" megacorp who think they can own everything: "John Lydon, Press Statement, August 31st 2021"

 by email:


John Lydon, Press Statement, August 31st 2021


In January this year, days before a worldwide press announcement, John Lydon was told of the proposed use of Sex Pistols recordings in a six part television series based upon a book written by Steve Jones. The project had been years in the making. Despite this, John Lydon was given just a few hours’ notice of what was to be announced.

Understandably, John, as the creative force of the Sex Pistols wanted to know how he was going to be portrayed and his musical works were going to be used to lend credibility to the series. Despite asking for details of the script or screenplay, John still does not know these details.

John Lydon did not ask for the recent proceedings. He was asked to allow the Sex Pistols works to be used without any prior consultation or involvement in the project. He took a stand on principle for what he sees as the integrity of the Sex Pistols legacy and fought for what he believed and continues to believe was right.

For more than 23 years the Sex Pistols have operated on the basis of unanimous decision making. The Disney production is the first time that the unanimous approach has been ignored.

It is disappointing that a High Court judge has decided that John Lydon is bound by an undated agreement signed in 1998,  which imposes on the Sex Pistols a majority rule arrangement in place of the unanimous decision making process that has been followed for 23 years.

Looking forward, there is great uncertainty about what the majority rule approach might do to water down and distort the true history and legacy of the Sex Pistols. Time will tell.

Whatever Disney does, it is doing it without John’s involvement or creative approval. John is powerless to prevent any distortion of the true history of the Sex Pistols and whatever results will be at the wish of the majority only.

In John’s words “I am the lead singer and songwriter, front man, image, the lot, you name it. I put it there. How is that not relevant? It is dumbfounding to me. It is so destructive to what the band is and so I fear that the whole project might be extremely negative. How can anyone think that this can proceed without consulting me and deal with my personal life in this, and my issues in this, without any meaningful contact with me before the project is announced to the world. I don’t think there are even words that I can put forward to explain quite how disingenuous this is. As I said in the lyrics of The Order of Death, This is what you want, this is what you get…”

John Lydon is embarking on a nationwide Q&A theatre tour in the UK http://www.johnlydon.com/tour-dates

If you have any questions, you can put them to John direct in venues throughout the UK from September to November.

Visit JohnLydon.Com

Friday, 13 August 2021

#FreeAssange: JOHN PILGER: A Day in the Death of British Justice – 13 Aug. 2021

 The reputation of British justice now rests on the shoulders of the High Court in the life or death case of Julian Assange.

The High Court at the Royal Courts of Justice. (David Castor/Wikimedia Commons)

By John Pilger
in London
Special to Consortium News

I sat in Court 4 in the Royal Courts of Justice in London Wednesday with Stella Moris, Julian Assange’s partner. I have known Stella for as long as I have known Julian. She, too, is a voice of freedom, coming from a family that fought the fascism of Apartheid. Today, her name was uttered in court by a barrister and a judge, forgettable people were it not for the power of their endowed privilege.

The barrister, Clair Dobbin, is in the pay of the regime in Washington, first Trump’s then Biden’s. She is America’s hired gun, or “silk”, as she would prefer. Her target is Julian Assange, who has committed no crime and has performed an historic public service by exposing the criminal actions and secrets on which governments, especially those claiming to be democracies, base their authority. 

For those who may have forgotten, WikiLeaks, of which Assange is founder and publisher, exposed the secrets and lies that led to the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Yemen, the murderous role of the Pentagon in dozens of countries, the blueprint for the 20-year catastrophe in Afghanistan, the attempts by Washington to overthrow elected governments, such as Venezuela’s, the collusion between nominal political opponents (Bush and Obama) to stifle a torture investigation and the CIA’s Vault 7 campaign that turned your mobile phone, even your TV set, into a spy in your midst.

WikiLeaks released almost a million documents from Russia which allowed Russian citizens to stand up for their rights. It revealed the Australian government had colluded with the U.S. against its own citizen, Assange. It named those Australian politicians who have “informed” for the U.S. It made the connection between the Clinton Foundation and the rise of jihadism in American-armed states in the Gulf.

About Those Who Take Us to War

There is more: WikiLeaks disclosed the U.S. campaign to suppress wages in sweatshop countries like Haiti, India’s campaign of torture in Kashmir, the British government’s secret agreement to shield “U.S. interests” in its official Iraq inquiry and the British Foreign Office’s plan to create a fake “marine protection zone” in the Indian Ocean to cheat the Chagos islanders out of their right of return.

In other words, WikiLeaks has given us real news about those who govern us and take us to war, not the preordained, repetitive spin that fills newspapers and television screens. This is real journalism; and for the crime of real journalism, Assange has spent most of the past decade in one form of incarceration or another, including Belmarsh prison, a horrific place.

Diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, he is a gentle, intellectual visionary driven by his belief that a democracy is not a democracy unless it is transparent, and accountable.

On Wednesday, the United States sought the approval of Britain’s High Court to extend the terms of its appeal against a decision by a district judge, Vanessa Baraitser, in January to bar Assange’s extradition. Baraitser accepted the deeply disturbing evidence of a number of experts that Assange would be at great risk if he were incarcerated in the U.S.’s infamous prison system.

Professor Michael Kopelman, a world authority on neuro-psychiatry, had said Assange would find a way to take his own life — the direct result of what Professor Nils Melzer, the United Nations rapporteur on torture, described as the craven “mobbing” of Assange by governments – and their media echoes.

Those of us who were in the Old Bailey last September to hear Kopelman’s evidence were shocked and moved. I sat with Julian’s father, John Shipton, whose head was in his hands. The court was also told about the discovery of a razor blade in Julian’s Belmarsh cell and that he had made desperate calls to the Samaritans and written notes and much else that filled us with more than sadness.

Watching the lead barrister acting for Washington, James Lewis — a man from a military background who deploys a cringingly theatrical “aha!” formula with defence witnesses — reduce these facts to “malingering” and smearing witnesses, especially Kopelman, we were heartened by Kopelman’s revealing response that Lewis’s abuse was “a bit rich” as Lewis himself had sought to hire Kopelman’s expertise in another case.

No Contradiction

Lewis’s sidekick is Clair Dobbin, and Wednesday was her day. Completing the smearing of Professor Kopelman was down to her. An American with some authority sat behind her in court.

Dobbin said Kopelman had “misled” Judge Baraister in September because he had not disclosed that Julian Assange and Stella Moris were partners, and their two young children, Gabriel and Max, were conceived during the period Assange had taken refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy in London.

The implication was that this somehow lessened Kopelman’s medical diagnosis: that Julian, locked up in solitary in Belmarsh prison and facing extradition to the U.S. on bogus “espionage” charges, had suffered severe psychotic depression and had planned, if he had not already attempted, to take his own life.

For her part, Judge Baraitser saw no contradiction. The full nature of the relationship between Stella and Julian had been explained to her in March 2020, and Professor Kopelman had made full reference to it in his report in August 2020. So the judge and the court knew all about it before the main extradition hearing last September. In her judgement in January, Baraitser said this:

“[Professor Kopelman] assessed Mr. Assange during the period May to December 2019 and was best placed to consider at first-hand his symptoms. He has taken great care to provide an informed account of Mr. Assange background and psychiatric history. He has given close attention to the prison medical notes and provided a detailed summary annexed to his December report. He is an experienced clinician and he was well aware of the possibility of exaggeration and malingering. I had no reason to doubt his clinical opinion.”

She added that she had “not been misled” by the exclusion in Kopelman’s first report of the Stella-Julian relationship and that she understood that Kopelman was protecting the privacy of Stella and her two young children.

In fact, as I know well, the family’s safety was under constant threat to the point when an embassy security guard confessed he had been told to steal one of the baby’s nappies so that a CIA-contracted company could analyse its DNA. There has been a stream of unpublicised threats against Stella and her children.

Based on a Fraudster

For the U.S. and its legal hirelings in London, damaging the credibility of a renowned expert by suggesting he withheld this information was a way, they no doubt reckoned, to rescue their crumbling case against Assange. In June, the Icelandic newspaper Stundin reported that a key prosecution witness against Assange has admitted fabricating his evidence. The one “hacking” charge the Americans hoped to bring against Assange if they could get their hands on him depended on this source and witness, Sigurdur Thordarson, an FBI informant.

Thordarson had worked as a volunteer for WikiLeaks in Iceland between 2010 and 2011. In 2011, as several criminal charges were brought against him, he contacted the FBI and offered to become an informant in return for immunity from all prosecution. It emerged that he was a convicted fraudster who embezzled $55,000 from WikiLeaks, and served two years in prison. In 2015, he was sentenced to three years for sex offenses against teenage boys. The Washington Post described Thordarson’s credibility as the “core” of the case against Assange.

On Wednesday, Lord Chief Justice Holroyde made no mention of this witness. His concern was that it was “arguable” that Judge Baraitser had attached too much weight to the evidence of Professor Kopelman, a man revered in his field. He said it was “very unusual” for an appeal court to have to reconsider evidence from an expert accepted by a lower court, but he agreed with Ms. Dobbin it was “misleading” even though he accepted Kopelman’s “understandable human response” to protect the privacy of Stella and the children.

If you can unravel the arcane logic of this, you have a better grasp than I who have sat through this case from the beginning. It is clear Kopelman misled nobody. Judge Baraitser – whose hostility to Assange personally was a presence in her court – said that she was not misled; it was not an issue; it did not matter. So why had Lord Chief Justice Holroyde spun the language with its weasel legalise and sent Julian back to his cell and its nightmares? There, he now waits for the High Court’s final decision in October – for Julian Assange, a life or death decision.

In the Land of Magna Carta

And why did Holroyde send Stella from the court trembling with anguish? Why is this case “unusual”? Why did he throw the gang of prosecutor-thugs at the Department of Justice in Washington — who got their big chance under Trump, having been rejected by Obama – a life raft as their rotting, corrupt case against a principled journalist sunk as surely as Titantic?

This does not necessarily mean that in October the full bench of the High Court will order Julian to be extradited. In the upper reaches of the masonry that is the British judiciary there are, I understand, still those who believe in real law and real justice from which the term “British justice” takes its sanctified reputation in the land of the Magna Carta. It now rests on their ermined shoulders whether that history lives on or dies.

I sat with Stella in the court’s colonnade while she drafted words to say to the crowd of media and well-wishers outside in the sunshine. Clip-clopping along came Clair Dobbin, spruced, ponytail swinging, bearing her carton of files: a figure of certainty: she who said Julian Assange was “not so ill” that he would consider suicide. How does she know?

Has Ms. Dobbin worked her way through the medieval maze at Belmarsh to sit with Julian in his yellow arm band, as Professors Koppelman and Melzer have done, and Stella has done, and I have done? Never mind. The Americans have now “promised” not to put him in a hellhole, just as they “promised” not to torture Chelsea Manning, just as they promised ……

And has she read the WikiLeaks’ leak of a Pentagon document dated 15 March, 2009? This foretold the current war on journalism. U.S. intelligence, it said, intended to destroy WikiLeaks’ and Julian Assange’s “centre of gravity” with threats and “criminal prosecution”. Read all 32 pages and you are left in no doubt that silencing and criminalising independent journalism was the aim, smear the method.

I tried to catch Ms. Dobbin’s gaze, but she was on her way: job done.

Outside, Stella struggled to contain her emotion. This is one brave woman, as indeed her man is an exemplar of courage. “What has not been discussed today,” said Stella, “is why I feared for my safety and the safety of our children and for Julian’s life. The constant threats and intimidation we endured for years, which has been terrorising us and has been terrorising Julian for 10 years. We have a right to live, we have a right to exist and we have a right for this nightmare to come to an end once and for all.”


John Pilger is an Australian-British journalist and filmmaker based in London.Pilger’s Web site is: www.johnpilger.com. In 2017, the British Library announced a John Pilger Archive of all his written and filmed work. The British Film Institute includes his 1979 film, “Year Zero: the Silent Death of Cambodia,” among the 10 most important documentaries of the 20thcentury. Some of his previous contributions to Consortium News can be found here.  


Chevron destruction: "Donziger: Why am I the one locked up and not Chevron?" - Greg Palast et al 12/08/2021

 Donziger: Why am I the one locked up and not Chevron?

Human rights lawyer facing prison for holding oil giant to account talks about his Kafkaesque case.

  • by Nicole Powers, Greg Palast and Dennis Bernstein
  • August 12, 2021

Calling in to the FlashPoints News studio from his new New York home, where he is currently under house arrest, human rights attorney Steven Donziger talks about his Kafkaesque case with host Dennis J. Bernstein and investigative reporter Greg Palast.

See interview with Greg Palast: https://soundcloud.com/user-835943867/flashpoints-feat-steven-donziger?utm_source=clipboard&utm_campaign=wtshare&utm_medium=widget&utm_content=https%253A%252F%252Fsoundcloud.com%252Fuser-835943867%252Fflashpoints-feat-steven-donziger

Greg Palast · FlashPoints feat. Steven Donziger

Palast has been reporting on this outrageous tale of oil, power, corruption, corporate murder and ecocide since 2007, when he first met one of Donziger’s clients, Emergildo Criollo, Chief of the Cofan people, deep in the Amazon rainforest. With the help of Donziger, Criollo had launched a David v. Goliath lawsuit against Chevron for poisoning the rainforest and the people who lived in it — the Chief’s two sons being among the many victims of the oil giant’s murderous sludge.

The Ecuadorian courts ruled in Criollo’s favor, finding that Chevron’s Texaco operation had illegally dumped 16 billion gallons of deadly oil waste, but that was just the beginning of Donziger’s battle.

Chevron were ordered to pay Criollo and the other indigenous co-plaintiffs $9.5 billion. Rather than pay up, and to distract attention from their own mass industrial poisoning, Chevron set out to destroy Donziger, to make an example of a human rights lawyer that dares take on the petroleum pirates.


Dennis Bernstein: We are going to be taking a look at the life and times of Steven Donziger… A Harvard graduate, instead of running for Senate, he went to Ecuador and began to fight and represent legally the tribes that were being abused by, among others, Chevron. He was quite successful and in 2011, he won a settlement for some $9.5 billion. And that’s where the second part of this story begins. Joining us now is Greg Palast… Greg, are you there?

Greg Palast: I am here. Am I sounding okay? Cause I’m in a remote location at a demonstration for Steven Donziger here in Los Angeles in front of a Chevron station. Does it sound okay to you?

Bernstein: It sounds fine. Today is a day of protest all over the country. Maybe you can just give us a thumbnail sketch of the case, which you picked up early on for the BBC.

Palast: Here’s the story. In 2007, I was in the Amazon rainforest in Ecuador with Chief Emergildo Criollo and I would join him as he walks into a courtroom. There’s a little building in the middle of the jungle where he filed a suit against Chevron corporation. Why? His three-year-old son had gone swimming in a swimming hole in the rainforest near the Amazon River — shiny nice water. He went in. Unfortunately, the shine was hydrocarbon. The kid came out vomiting blood and died in his dad’s. Then his oldest son died of leukemia, which is rampant in the area where the Chevron Texaco unit was dumping its sludge. He filed a lawsuit. All the guys in the courtroom were laughing at this “indio” trying to take on the Chevron corporation. Four years later, they stopped laughing when Chief Criollo and the other indigenous plaintiffs won $9.5 billion from an Ecuadorian court against Chevron, demanding that Chevron paid the Chief for his losses, but also clean up the rainforest filled with sludge.

Palast in the Amazon with Chevron’s poisonous, murderous sludge.

I was down there reporting for BBC television and Democracy Now. I would stick a stick into the water and it would come up dripping sludge — poisonous, murderous sludge. Now, what was Chief Criollo’s secret weapon? His name was Steven Donziger. He graduated from Harvard Law School with Barack Obama, but instead of cashing in, he decided to spend his entire life, give up everything — and I mean he really gave up every dime of income to do nothing but help the Cofan and other indigenous people of the rainforest go after Chevron. Get them to clean up their act, literally cleaned it up, and pay compensation. He won that case — that was 10 years ago — and Chevron hasn’t paid a single dime.

But what they have done is they — are you ready for this ? — got 2,000 lawyers from 60 law firms to hunt down and try to destroy Steven Donziger. And the way that they did it is they went to hunt around one U.S. court after another, until they found an ultra-right judge, a guy named Lewis Kaplan in New York who had been a tobacco industry.lawyer. He’d even done work for Chevron. He shouldn’t have been on this case. He issued a ruling that Steven Donziger, this human rights lawyer, this pro bono lawyer, that this lawyer was in contempt of court. Because he ordered Donziger to hand Chevron Donziger’s cellphone and computers so they could see who were the whistleblowers in their corporation, so they could see the names of the natives who were going after them. You have to understand, in Latin America, you hand out those names, the next knock on your door is from the death squad. He couldn’t hand over those names. No lawyer in their right mind would, especially in that situation. So they found him in contempt of court.

And the judge not only said it’s contempt of court… If you remember in the Chicago Seven trial, William Kunstler was found in contempt of court 42 times in a single case. Well, Donziger, they made it criminal contempt. The judge demanded the federal government prosecute Donziger — and they didn’t. Believe it or not, the Trump Justice Department said this is a joke, isn’t it? We’re not going to prosecute this lawyer. Because the Justice Department wouldn’t prosecute Donziger, are you ready for this, Dennis? This has never happened in American history. The judge appointed his own prosecutor. And who was the prosecutors that he appointed? He appointed Chevron’s own lawyers. I can’t make this up. He appointed Chevron’s own lawyers to be the prosecutors to put Donziger in prison.

Bernstein: That’s where I got to stop you, Greg, because that’s the part of this story that I stumble over. I don’t understand that leap there. What are you saying? This judge put lawyers who represent Chevron to…

Palast: He literally appointed them to do a criminal prosecution. So a judge appoints a private attorney to do a criminal prosecution of the lawyer that they are fighting in the case. It’s Chevron’s lawyers who literally were acting as privateer prosecutors, freelance prosecutors. I can’t make this up. And you have to understand, it shocked me. Because, as many people know, before I was an investigative reporter, I was an investigator for two or three decades of litigation in big cases. I’ve never seen this in my career. I can’t find a single attorney [who has]. In U.S. history we have never had a private corporation being asked to prosecute someone on a criminal charge, and especially the guys that he’s fighting… I understand why you’re confused, because everyone’s confused. There is no legal scholar in America [that’s not confused].

We have 60 Nobel laureates complaining about this. We have senators, congresspeople, from AOC to Senator Markey and Congressman McGovern. We have attorneys general from several states saying this is insane. We have the Justice Department — I want to add Trump’s Justice Department — who also said this is nuts, but it hasn’t stopped. And it’s even worse. They had a trial, after holding Donziger under house arrest for two years… You have to understand, even if this crazy charge was legitimate, it’s a misdemeanor charge, and you’d only get 90 days in prison for it. He’s actually been in prison for two years, awaiting for trial. Now you don’t imprison someone before conviction, while they’re awaiting trial, unless they’re a flight risk.

Bernstein: So he’s under house arrest at home with an ankle bracelet?

Palast: He’s wearing an ankle bracelet. He’s been locked in his house for two years awaiting this trial. And if he gets convicted, it’s 90 days. But 90 days ain’t enough for the judge. So the judge held a trial of Donziger and Donziger, of course, asked for a jury. I think you’ve read the Constitution. It says something about a jury — that’s called the Fifth Amendment. You got a right to a jury of your peers. No way. The judge said no jury. Believe it or not, he denied him a jury trial. And the judge listened to the court case while he’s doing crossword puzzles — I kid you not. And he wouldn’t allow Donziger to put up witnesses from Ecuador. Instead, he only had Chevron lawyers as witnesses against Donziger, being asked questions by the prosecutors who were other Chevron lawyers — I can’t make this up — listening to it by a judge who was a Chevron lawyer.

You know what, this is so insane Dennis… I’ve been in many cases in courtrooms and covered them as a journalist. No one can show me a single case in American history, no jury trial, Chevron, an oil company prosecuting the guy who’s going after them. It is a miscarriage of justice upon miscarriage of justice. And here’s the deal; after this crazy Chevron kangaroo court, the judge is apparently going to pass sentence on October 1 on Donziger. He’s indicated he’s gonna throw him in the slammer for six months. No jury trial. This is crazy. Basically Chevron is putting a human rights lawyer opposing them in prison for six months. It’s just beyond imagination.

Bernstein: And the $9.5 billion settlement? Is it just null and void now?

Palast: No, it’s not. It’s live… It was affirmed in Ecuador. And by the way, just so you know, Donziger had brought the case in America, in New York, and Chevron ran into the courtroom and said no, this case has gotta be in Ecuador and here’s 14 professors who signed a statement saying that Ecuador has honest courts that are un-corruptible that will come to a good decision, and therefore the case should be heard in Ecuador. It took four years of trial, hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, and a judge ruled that there’s absolute stone cold evidence that Chevron Texaco units dumped 16 billion gallons of sludge into the rainforest in Ecuador that directly poisoned thousands of people. Many died. There’s a hotspot of horrid leukemia that’s rampant next to those oil pits. By the way, if you simply dump oil sludge into an open pit in the United States, you would go to prison. Chevron tried this. Remember the Chevron refineries in Richmond, right near you Dennis, if they try that in the Bay Area, can you imagine? If in Berkeley you had open sludge pits, with Chevron just dumping the Richmond refinery crud on Telegraph Avenue — that’s what it’s like. I was there, Dennis. I was there…

Bernstein: Let me jump in here because we got some good news. We actually managed to make a connection with Steven Donziger and I’m eally anxious to get you on the air, Mr. Donziger.. Welcome to FlashPoints on Pacifica Radio. How are you doing today?

Steven Donziger: Thank you for having me.

Bernstein: Well, it’s good to have you with us. Let me just ask you… We’ve been talking about it with Greg and we got some good background down, but let me sort of travel back a little bit here. Could you talk a little bit about the legal work you were doing in Ecuador that led you to this successful $9.5 billion lawsuit. Tell us about what you were doing there? What was the work like?

Donziger: Well, thank you. And thank you, Greg. Good to hear. I caught the tail end of that. You’re really know the case so well. It’s really awesome.

I first went to Ecuador 1993 with a team of lawyers and what we saw was an apocalyptic nightmare, sort of like Greg was describing. I mean, we literally saw lakes of oil sludge on the floor of the jungle. [There were] hundreds and hundreds of these open-air toxic waste pits that Chevron had gouged out of the floor of the jungle and they had run pipes from the pits into the rivers and streams that people relying on for drinking. A total disregard for human life, disregard for the environment. I think it’s really the very definition of ecocide, which is going to be a new atrocity crime which involves a private company making deliberate decisions that end up destroying the conditions necessary to sustain human life. That’s what they did. Even to this day, you have thousands of people who multiple times each day are exposed to cancer-causing toxins in the water they drink, the food they eat, the air they breathe.

My work involved investigating this, with other lawyers, and filing a lawsuit, first in the United States. Chevron wanted it in Ecuador. The first 10 years of the case was fighting over trying to get into a U.S, court. Chevron got it dismissed down to Ecuador, appraising Ecuador’s court system, as Greg pointed out. So we sort of redid the case under Ecuadorian law in 2001 and worked with a fabulous team of Ecuadorian lawyers. We were then in the advisory role, the American lawyers, over an eight year period where Chevron’s lawyers tried to sabotage, delay and obstruct the case at every step of the way. We ended up winning this judgment based on really voluminous, scientific evidence; 64,000 chemical sampling results, from both parties, that proved there were just massive levels of toxic contamination, cancer-causing contamination at hundreds of oil production sites that Texaco, now Chevron, had operated for a period of 25 years. It’s the worst oil disaster in the world.

One of the critical facts is it’s not an accident. It’s a deliberately designed pollution event where Texaco decided to do it this way, essentially to play God with the people of Ecuador in order to save $2 or $3 a barrel of oil produced. The net result today, 50 years after this started, is you have the world’s worst oil disaster. You have thousands of people dead or dying from exposure. You have virtually no medical care. You have indigenous groups decimated, on the way to extinction because the forest is now poisoned by these deliberate acts of destruction. It can no longer sustain the culture, so it’s a disaster from every angle.

Chevron has yet to pay a single dollar to fix it. Having lost the court case, instead of complying with the rule of law and paying the judgment, they hired dozens of law firms who use 2000 lawyers to attack me and other lawyers. Really it’s a way, I think, primarily to distract attention from their own mass industrial poisoning, Also to avoid paying the money to the people they poisoned in Ecuador. And finally, to sort of use me as a way to try to intimidate other human rights lawyers and environmental defenders from doing this work.


Bernstein: We broadcast from the Bay Area and they’re also poisoning people in the Bay Area and Richmond and other places like that. But I want to say a little bit more… You’re under house arrest now, so I imagine that was a bit of retaliation. But I imagine that other folks, indigenous people on the ground, while you may be under house arrest, they’re either in hiding or in their graves for protesting these kinds of issues. Wouldn’t you say?

Donziger: Well, yeah, I mean, a lot of people have died from exposure to the toxins.

Bernstein: And whistleblowers have not been welcome, right? Indigenous [whistleblowers], this is not safe [for them].

Donziger: Of course. There’s 200 environmental defenders assassinated — murdered — around the world every year. So, you know, I’m part of the group of environmental defenders under attack. You know, in the United States, generally, it’s difficult for a corporation to just flat out assassinate their opponent. But what Chevron has done to me is figure out a way to use — or abuse — and manipulate the law to accomplish, or try to accomplish, my cancellation as a lawyer.

The way they’ve done that is they’ve concocted a scheme where they’ve tried to get me to pay them their legal fees for attacking me in the U.S. courts. I have no money. I mean, I’m a human rights lawyer. They got an order that I should pay them millions of dollars. When I couldn’t pay it, they wiped out my life savings and demanded to see my computer on the theory that I was hiding money in bank accounts. But what they really wanted was access to all my information and my communications with my clients and other attorneys. And no lawyer in U.S. history has ever been ordered to turn over his computer to his adversary in the middle of a civil litigation like that. So I appealed it.

The judge, Judge Kaplan, who was a former tobacco industry defense lawyer, he’s totally on Chevron side, he charged me with criminal contempt of court for appealing his own civil discovery order. I appealed it. I wasn’t just disobeying it. I told him I needed to appeal it because I believe the order was, and has been proven to be, illegal. But he then used that charge, which was rejected by the federal prosecutor… Remember the judge charged me, not the normal prosecutor. When the normal prosecutor refused to prosecute Judge Kaplan’s charges, Kaplan didn’t stop. He appointed a private law firm to prosecute me while hiding the fact that this private law firm had had Chevron as a client and had deep financial ties to the oil and gas industry. So essentially I’m being prosecuted criminally and deprived of my liberty by Chevron. This is the first corporate prosecution in U.S. history, based on the research we’ve conducted, and it’s scary.

Bernstein: And you’re wearing an ankle bracelet?

Donziger: I have an ankle bracelet on a 24/7. I sleep with it. I eat with it. I bathe with it. It’s on my ankle, it chafes and it’s like the size of a garage door opener. It’s somewhat heavy and I have to get in the bed with it. It blinks, it talks to me when the battery goes low, wakes me up, me and my wife…

Bernstein: Talk about Kafkaesque. This does Kafka one better.

Donziger: Yes, this is Kafkaesque.

“The only way I’m going to get out of this, and we’re going to force Chevron to clean up Ecuador, is through mass public pressure.”
~ Steven Donziger

Bernstein: You have been neutralized by Chevron, with 2000 lawyers. And obviously you’re making the point, as Greg has, that they have a lot tied [to this] and so they’re willing… I guess a part of their budget is meant to be spent on dealing with people like you in various ways, however they can do it. You, they tied up legally, others they kill. It’s troubling that they would take your files… This happens under the eye of the U.S. jurisprudence system. You’ve got a Democrat in there now. They’re not Donald Trump. Is there any sympathy in Washington? … What kind of support do you have coming out of Washington? There’s a new administration. They’re progressive…

Donziger: So a couple of things… First of all, this is not just happening under the eye of the U.S. judiciary. There are two federal judges actively working with Chevron’s lawyers to destroy me. I want to be very clear about that. I believe they’re abusing their power. I want to be clear about that. Their names are Lewis Kaplan and Loretta Preska. And let me be clear: I’m a rule of law guy. I’m not condemning the whole U.S. judiciary. Even the right wing judges tend to try to follow the law when they rule in cases. These judges figure out what they want to do beforehand, they don’t really listen to the facts, and they just try to engineer a result, which is why I’ve been denied a jury of my peers.

In this trial that was overseen by Judge Preska, the same judge who would lock me up for two years was then ruling on my guilt or innocence. It’s just a completely ridiculous show trial and I’m going to appeal it. She convicted me of contempt, wouldn’t let me testify on my behalf and explain myself. So we have made a concerted effort to get to the Biden Administration and Merrick Garland to stop this prosecution. You can’t have private corporate prosecutions in a rule of law country. There’s no provision for it and this should be embarrassing to Joe Biden and Merrick Garland. But Merrick Garland has done nothing.

We got six congresspersons, including AOC, Cori Bush, Jamal Bowman, Rashida Tlaib, Jamie Raskin, Jim McGovern who wrote a letter demanding a review of my case, he ignored it. Two senators, Ed Markey and Sheldon Whitehouse, both of whom I greatly admire, have written a letter demanding answers, that came just about 10 days ago. But the higher New York delegate where I live, my representative, totally ignored this and works for the same law firm, Gibson Dunne. My senators, Schumer and Gillibrand, I approached both of them, they’ve done nothing. People are fundamentally, in my view, under the influence of big money, corporations and the industry to some degree and for whatever the reason they refuse to help me, even though senators and congresspersons from other jurisdictions are helping. But we need more action in Washington.

We can’t become a country that locks up its human rights lawyers. I mean, that’s not even a conservative vision for the United States, and that’s not the moderate and progressive one. We cannot lock up our human rights lawyers, especially the frontline lawyers who do the hard work like I’ve done for 28 years. This is hard work. I went through it 450 times. We won the case. We’re holding a major polluter accountable, that helps save lives. It helps save cultures, it helps save the planet. It realigns incentives so these big oil companies don’t go to the ecosystem and just pollute, thinking they can get away with it. Why am I the one locked up and not Chevron? It’s outrageous!

Bernstein: It’s amazing. Greg, do you have final comments? You want to jump in here?

Palast: Yes. Also shame on the U.S. media. As you know, I put the story about the poisoning of the rainforest… I went down there and I put this at the top of the BBC nightly news. And thanks to Pacifica, we put it on Democracy Now as well. This is worldwide news outside of the U.S. mainstream. I have to tell you, I contacted PBS, but you know what? The NewsHour on PBS… when I’m calling them, I’m looking at their website, and what’s on top? It’s not the PBS logo, it was a Chevron logo. They were the number one corporate sponsor of the PBS NewsHour. And when I said, is this influencing your silence on the issue? Their answer was to simply remove Chevron’s logo. But they also silenced Steven Donziger and the victims from Ecuador, you have to understand. Then they went after me, by the way. Compared to what Steven’s gone through my case was nothing. I ended up with a one-year trial under British law, [because they claimed] that I had issued a biased report against Chevron. All I did was show the documents that said that they were destroying evidence in the case and they didn’t like that. I won that case and I saved my job at the BBC. But they throw bodies out on the tarmac, whether it’s Steven Donziger, to stop other lawyers and human rights layers from defending environmental victims. Or they go after journalists like Greg Palast or others. Look, if I were in Latin America, I would probably have a bullet in my head. I’ve seen this.

And it’s not just in Ecuador that Chevron has been playing these games and silencing the lawyers and the journalists and the victims. It’s not just Ecuador. That’s really important. And Dennis, I can’t thank you enough for giving this story prominence and bringing Steven on from his imprisonment. And let’s not forget October 1, he’s facing a sentence where they can put them behind the hard steel doors.

Bernstein: It is beyond belief. Steven Donziger, we will continue to cover this story. It is extraordinary… It’s hard for me to imagine… you’re wearing an ankle bracelet for being a human rights lawyer. This is really a story that needs to be told again and again, because it’s going to get worse before it gets better. Steven Donziger, how do people get in touch and follow up if they want to learn more, do more, act more?

Donziger: If people want to learn more or help, please go to the Donziger defense website: DonzigerDefense.com. On that website are a lot of articles. You can donate to our defense fund. I need to emphasize that I know a lot of people are hurting these days, but if you can give a little, we really appreciate it. The legal expenses are crazy dealing with this monster company. And then also just sign up for our campaign, where you will get regular case updates and that kind of thing. We built an email list now of 25,000 people around the world. It’s really amazing ‘cause we can use that to lobby Congress or write letters. Please sign up. The only way I’m going to get out of this, and we’re going to force Chevron to clean up Ecuador, is through mass public pressure. And that’s what we’re attempting to do here. They want to me lock up, then people are going to pay attention and we’re going to leverage that into a movement. That’s at least our goal and we’re well on our way to doing that.

Nicole Powers

Nicole Powers

Writer, editor, photographer, videographer, social media consultant, and tactivist (tactical activist), Nicole Powers uses art and technology to share ideas that make the world a better place.

Greg Palast

Greg Palast has written four New York Times bestsellers, including Armed MadhouseBillionaires & Ballot Bandits, and The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, now a major non-fiction movie, available on Amazon and can be streamed for FREE by Prime members!

Stay informed, get the signed DVD  of The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, a signed copy of the companion book or better still, get the Book & DVD combo.

Support The Palast Investigative Fund  and keep our work alive!  Become a monthly contributor and automatically receive Palast's new films and books when they're released!

Or support us by shopping with Amazon Smile. AmazonSmile will donate 0.5% of your purchases to the Sustainable Markets Foundation which automatically goes to the benefit of The Palast Investigative Fund and you get a tax-deduction! More info .

Subscribe to Palast's Newsletter or his special list for Poems & Stories.


Dennis Bernstein


Dennis J. Bernstein is the executive producer and host of Flashpoints, an award winning front-line investigative news magazine focusing on human, civil and workers' rights, issues of war and peace, global warming, racism and poverty, and other issues. Flashpoints is broadcast weekdays at 5 PM PST on the Pacifica Radio station KPFA-FM (94.1) in Berkeley, California and is relayed on Pacifica's national feed.

source:  https://www.gregpalast.com/why-am-i-the-one-locked-up-and-not-chevron/

Saturday, 7 August 2021

Hacker interview: Gummo: what the police and others can do on your pc…and a whole lot more 07 Aug. 2021

Hacker interview: Gummo - [go to 32mins in to see just how vulnerable most pcs are]

10 Dec. 2020 

Soft White Underbelly
2.27M subscribers

Soft White Underbelly interview and portrait of Gummo, a computer hacker from Jacksonville, Florida.