butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

butlincat's blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

This site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they have been since. "Shadowbanning" is the act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community - see more: What is SHADOWBANNING: Twitter: are you shadowbanned? - truther sites are targeted, eg: NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media - "Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others." - Charles Bukowski

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption”...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

...hello + welcome!....FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License..... For more information please visit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Targeted? victimised?...been dealt particularly "rough justice"? meet some who have, and still are! VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

This blog is for regular updates + info connected to the ILLUMINATI, 911, 7/7, recent UFO sightings, CHEMTRAILS, MORGELLONS [98% OF WORLDS POPULATION HAS MORGELLONS DISEASE, they claim - see #Morgellons & #SmartDust Infect Individuals to be Tracked via Satellite https://www.youtu.be/RvNDk2t8TGk], MIND CONTROL {MK ULTRA.MANNEQUIN etc.}, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, JOHN LEAR, ALEX COLLIER, PROJECT CAMELOT, PROJECT AVALON, MICHAEL TSARION, JORDAN MAXWELL, PRESTON NICHOLS, AL BIELEK, STEWART SWERDELOW, DUNCAN CAMERON, WILLIAM COOPER, PHIL SCHNEIDER, David Wilcock, FRITZ SPRINGMEIER, BILLY MEIER, MAX IGAN, STEW WEBB, "Democracy Now!", Henry Makow, Linda Moulton-Howe, Dan Burisch, Webster Tarpley, Brother Nathanael, Timothy Good, Miles Johnson, Jim Marrs, John Hutchison, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Dr. John Hall, Edward Snowden, Vladimir Putin, John Lennon, Bob Zimmerman + many more who can only be described as heroes...

Wordpress: VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/butlincat

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/butlin.cat.9

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap." Galatians 6:7

......Namaste.....John Graham - butlincat

Jai guru deva om जय गुरुदेव ॐ


Tuesday, 29 November 2011

BREAKING: CHILDS REMAINS FOUND AT INDIAN RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL, ONTARIO

Historic Breaking News: A Child's Remains and other bones have been identified at Canada's oldest Indian residential school in Brantford, Ontario - please post

An International Media Release from the Mohawk Nation and The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) - November 29, 2011

A Child's Remains and other bones have been identified at Canada's oldest Indian residential school

in Brantford, Ontario:

A Statement from the

Kanien'keha':ka Nation of the Grand River

Video:

Archaeological surveys

and test digs authorized by we, elders of the Kanien'keha:ka Nation,

have been conducted at the former Mohawk Institute Indian residential school

since October 1.

This past week, while on

the grounds of the school, our researchers along with Kevin Annett

-Rawennatshani, who acts with our approval, have unearthed what has been

described as human remains. One bone among sixteen uncovered has been

identified, through preliminary visual examination by a competent archaeologist,

as that of a young child. This bone sample is described by the same

archaeologist as "definitely human".

A test dig in a twenty

square foot area on grounds adjoining the former Mohawk Institute have revealed

a considerable number of bones, as well as buttons which have been confirmed to

be part of the children's school uniforms. Large deposits of coal were also

found associated with these remains, all at a depth of barely two feet. Several

of the bones have also been cut up, suggesting that the bodies may have been

deliberately dismembered, while other bones were broken.

We declare the area on and near the former

Mohawk Institute to be a crime site under our jurisdiction, and we will not

allow representatives of the Crown or Church of England, or the government of

Canada, access to these excavations because of their complicity in this crime.

These institutions have consistently refused to

disclose the evidence they possess regarding the Mohawk Institute and the

deaths of children under their legal care, and therefore, we are proceeding to

charge these bodies with crimes against humanity in international courts of

justice, based in part on the forensic evidence we have uncovered.

We now call upon our community and the world to

rally behind our efforts to bring recognition to the remains of children buried

on the Mohawk Institute grounds, and our work to excavate this site. Prior to

any possible repatriation of these remains, and because these remains may

include children from other indigenous nations, we look to those nations to

participate with us in this work and welcome their input, and we urge them to

begin their own excavat

Read More

Sunday, 27 November 2011

UPDATE - MAURICE KIRK - SAT 26 NOV.

Photobucket

UPDATE – MAURICE KIRK CALL ON HUNGER STRIKE STILL – SAT. 26 NOV.


Posted on November 27, 2011 by butlincat

Maurice stated in a brief call today that:



a} he had been sectioned



the implications of this do not bear thinking about, as one could be placed anywhere – any institution – and it would take months for any appeal to be forthcoming.



b} the planned trial, due to take place on Tuesday 29 Nov. will not now go ahead. To a large extent Maurice’s re-attaining freedom rests on this hearing.



c} a unique prison officer has been allocated to govern the wing he is on with the express purpose to monitor Maurice, such is the seriousness of the situation.



d} important papers are still being witheld by the magistrate by which Maurice needs to brief his new legal representatives about his case. These new solicitors etc. he has been ordered to use.



e} Still all medication is refused, along with many other rights basic to a remand prisoner, and he is still bedridden in a freezing punishment block cell on hunger strike, now in its 4th week.



More updates as and when they come.



Nothing else has changed


For the latest updates please see:
   http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/ and Murice's site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Maurice Kirk 25 Oct. 2011:




FAO HMP Cardiff Governor / Cardiff Courts



1. I am on hunger strike because I am being refused a proper application for bail and to have my medical records clarified or corrected.



2. Also, both South Wales Police and HM Prison have conspired to confiscate my legal papers, computer, cash and proper access to both telephone and secretarial facilities to defend myself.



3.More importantly, the current reason for ‘HM Partnership Wales’ conspiracy to pervert the

course is just to block my access to both the civic and criminal courts in the UK, in my civil action for damages due to 20 years of South Wales Police bullying.



4. 17 Oct 2011 county Court letter indicates my appeal for further disclosure of 10 MAPPA meetings,in both police stations and their forensic Laboratory, Caswell Clinic, was dismissed as I failed to attend on 28th Sept. 2011.



5. Likewise with BS614159, appeals FD10C00242, FD10C00195 and current JRs,including CO/4298/2011 again because prison refuses my request to contact the court.



6. HHJ N. Cooke QC refuses, with Cardiff Magistrates, to consider my private persecution information laid against Dr Williams for falsifying my medical evidence at the request of the Police.



7.‘HM Partnership’ Wales refused to provide me of notify my legal representative alternativein my place, for High Court and administrative court 28th Sept & 4th Oct hearings, knowing Iwas seriously incapacitated during the first two weeks in my current remand in custody to face a Section 2 Harassment Act 1997 complained by Dr T Williams.



8. In September 11 I was transferred from London Police custody for ‘tape recording in court’,

attempting to breakout of Tottenham Police Station, demanding my own lawyers hand over my own legal papers and best of this nonsense, conspiracy by aeroplane to abduct 6 young Nigerian children snatched by Haringey Council.



9. Cardiff Prison refuse me my legal papers, basic stationery to be able to interview my own defence witnesses or get proper medical attention.



10. By Sept 11 letters, the Independent Police Complaints Commission IPCC have given the South Wales Police dispensation from an enquiry of their ‘shoot to kill’ policy and painting the ‘machine gun’ a different colour to fool the Jury.



11. HM Prison refuses to release my faxes from my lawyer.



—————————————————————————-



Maurice Kirk – in 2009



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3xl4TvHtOE

Friday, 25 November 2011

Photobucket

Christopher Alder

ANOTHER COVER-UP!!!!!!!

http://www.doughtystreet.co.uk/

"Government pays out over death of Falklands veteran in Police Custody

(Published on Wednesday, 23 November, 2011)

The government has agreed that the treatment of Christopher Alder byHull police while he died on the floor of a police station in 1998violated his rights under Article 3 ECHR. Mr Alder died after beingdragged unconscious into Hull police station and laid face-down on thefloor of the custody suite with his hands still handcuffed behind hisback. He was bleeding from the mouth and his trousers had come down tohis knees so that the lower half of his body was exposed. He was leftthere face-down breathing through the pool of blood collecting on thefloor by his mouth for 11 minutes until he died. While he lay therethe police officers who had brought him into the station engaged incasual banter and discussed how they could justify his arrest. The police officers involved have never been subject to anydisciplinary or criminal sanction for their behaviour. After JanetAlder brought proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights thegovernment admitted a violation of Article 3 and Article 14 ECHR andalso of the procedural obligations under Articles 2 and 3 ECHR inrelation to the investigation into his treatment and death. Charlotte Kilroy, led by Danny Friedman, and instructed by Liberty,represented Janet Alder, Mr Alder's sister. For the full story as reported on the BBC & Guardian please click onthe hyperlinks.

To view the press release please click here. * News Home * Top of Page News * News Home * News Archive

-------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/nov/22/government-apologise-alder-family-police-death?newsfeed=true
"Government to apologise to Alder family over police custody death'

Maya Wolfe-Robinson and Owen Bowcott The Guardian, Tuesday 22 November 2011 Article history

The government is to apologise to the family of Christopher Alder, who died in a Hull police station.

The government will formally apologise through the European court of human rights (ECHR) to the family of Christopher Alder, a black ex-soldier who choked to death in handcuffs on the floor of a Hull police station 13 years ago.

The "unilateral declaration" made by the United Kingdom to the court is a highly unusual admission of widespread failures in the investigation into the cause of the Falklands veteran's death.

In its statement to the ECHR, the government will concede that it breached its obligations in regard to preserving life and ensuring that no one is subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment. The family is to receive €34,000 (£29,000) from the government in an ex gratia payment and to cover legal costs.

The unusual step of issuing a statement of that sort is a form of settlement and invites the court to strike out the case. The government had fought not to have the case heard in Strasbourg, before lodging an official statement and apology to the Alder family. Its apology is on behalf of Humberside police.

A letter of the apology states: "The government of the United Kingdom regrets the occurrence of the actions which have led to the bringing of the present application, in particular the treatment in custody of the applicant's brother, Mr Christopher Alder, and the anguish that this treatment and his death have caused to his family."

"The government accepts that the lack of an effective and independent investigation in this case constitutes a violation of the procedural obligations in articles 2 and 3 of the Convention. Further, the government accept that the treatment that the applicant's brother received in police custody amounted to a substantive violation of article 3 with 14 of the Convention."

Earlier this month it emerged that Alder's body had mistakenly been left in a mortuary for 11 years after his family believed they had buried him.

His death in April 1998 was one of the most controversial in police custody. Closed-circuit TV footage was recovered showing the 37-year-old father-of-two gasping for air as officers chatted and joked around him. The film showed he received no help from five police officers, who thought he was play acting, as he lost his fight for life. It took 11 minutes for him to stop breathing. Afterwards, as Alder lay dead, monkey-like noises were detected on the audio tape.

After an inquest lasting seven weeks, a jury returned a verdict of unlawful killing, citing "positional asphyxia". Five police officers were prosecuted for manslaughter but the trial was halted when the judge ruled there was no evidence for a conviction. They were later cleared by a police disciplinary hearing of neglect of duty.

Janet Alder, the dead man's sister, said: "It has taken 13 years to break through what I see as a reluctance of the organisations dealing with controversial custody deaths to hold police officers accountable, or to believe or consider whether police officers could be capable of severe maltreatment of citizens within their custody."

"Why or where did Christopher sustain the additional injuries he suffered? Why was another of his teeth missing? Where was his belt? These concerns have never been investigated or addressed.

"It has taken bringing an action in the European court of human rights – and judges there unanimously acknowledging my complaints were admissible after watching the horrific video of Christopher's death - to force the government to apologise for failing to hold the officers responsible accountable.

"It wasn't hard to see that my brother – an ex-paratrooper decorated for his services – was denied his right to life; that his treatment was inhuman and degrading and that race played a part in his death."

Welcoming the UK's declaration, the human rights organisation Liberty, which has supported Janet Alder, said: "The government's unprecedented apology and admission of blatant violations of fundamental human rights are hugely significant and certainly not before time.

Corinna Ferguson, the legal officer for Liberty, added: "More than 13 years on still no one in the police has been held responsible for Christopher's shocking death. Proper accountability is vital in these situations and in future the Independent Police Complaints Commission must take stronger, more decisive action where serious human rights violations occur.

"The offence of misconduct in public office is completely inadequate in these circumstances – as demonstrated by the fact that these officers were somehow cleared of it. Sadly admissions and apologies will matter little if such tragic cases keep occurring."

• This article was amended on 22 November 2011. The original headline stated that he died in a police cell and the original text suggested that Liberty is supporting the entire Alder family. These have been corrected."

...b.​

COASTTOCOASTAM RADIO - INVESTIGATING DEMONS - 16 NOV

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/11/18


Investigating Demons/ Open Lines

 Show Audio

Listen with Windows Player High Low

Listen with Coast Player

(Pop-up blockers may need to be disabled)

Download MP3s

Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4

IMPORTANT: Some mobile devices do not download MP3s. Please use your desktop computer if this is the case.

Date: 11-18-11

Host: George Noory

Guests: K.W. Kesler, Open Lines
In the first half of the show, paranormal and occult researcher K.W. Kesler provided a brief overview on demons and shared some of his investigations into their demonic activity. Kesler said he was initiated into the world of the paranormal as a teenager, when the confused spirit of a deceased neighbor visited his house and interacted with him. His paranormal research eventually led him into demonology and to houses infested with demons. During one investigation, he reported finding evidence of 12-inch footprints with claws after spreading talcum powder on a home's hard wood floors. Kesler recalled hearing a ghastly shriek from a bedroom and found all of the furniture there turned upside down. Next, an "unearthly rumble, almost like something [was] breaking the time-space barrier, the fabric of known reality," announced the arrival of what he described as a shadow person with glowing red eyes. A Catholic priest was contacted to perform a blessing on the house and afterwards the demonic activity ceased, he added.
Kesler confessed that he was shaken by his most recent case, as he may have inadvertently stumbled upon a possible link between 2012 and the demonic world. According to Kesler, things happened in this house and to this client that he had never seen before, noting an episode where everything in the kitchen cabinets was inexplicably switched with the contents of the refrigerator. Kesler revealed that he asked aloud for the invisible culprit to identify itself and heard a voice on both sides of him whisper the name Lebara—a demon worshipped by the Mayan-related cult of Yoruban. Everybody else experienced this as well, he asserted. Stranger still, Kesler claimed to have witnessed, as it was happening, numerals being scratched into his client's skin. When the unseen assailant finished, the number '406' could be clearly seen, he observed. Kesler said he later realized that there were 406 days from the date of his investigation until December 21, 2012, and believes this could be a sign of biblically catastrophic things to come.
-------------------------------------------------
During Open Lines, Tim from Orange, California, recounted a terrifying confrontation he had with a shadowy figure covered in blade-like spines. Tim said he awoke in total blackness and intense pain to find the creature pinning him down against the bed. Miraculously, he was able to get a hold of a stuffed toy rabbit that he had been compelled to buy the day before and was instantly able to move again and free himself. James in Eugene, Oregon, told George about an encounter with the see-through figure of a little girl that he saw standing in his kitchen one night. The entity was able to exit the house through a small crack in the back door, a space far too small for an actual person to fit through, he explained. Athena, a self-professed demonologist from Burbank, California, talked about the time she was investigating a hospital with her paranormal group and came across a red-eyed apparition in a dark corridor. Camera lights momentarily blocked the entity from view, but as soon as they were moved away she found herself standing face to face with a "black blur,” Athena said.
News segment guests: Jeff Nelken / Douglas Hagmann
Website(s):
•demon101.com
Book(s):
•Demonology 101

SOLDIERS

THIS IS WHY I HATE SOLDIERS - THEY ARE THE SCUM OF THE EARTH AND KILL ANY FORM OF LIFE, INCLUDING HUMAN, FOR FUN


Thursday, 24 November 2011

Tragedies of Cornel & Nicola Nov 2011

It is disgraceful how MPs and other hypocrites completely ignore the crimes councils committ, in collusion with corrupt judges and solicitors and police. - these criminals must be rooted out, exposed and prosecuted for what they really are - outright criminals - or innocent children and their parents will continue to be tortured by these scum. We have their names



 

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

STUART USHER - "SCOTLAND AGAINST CROOKED LAWYERS" SITE

Host of Solicitors from Hell-style sites appear following court action


http://www.thelawyer.com/host-of-solicitors-from-hell-style-sites-appear-following-court-action/1010341.article

See Stuart Ushers site exposing corrupt criminal lawyers -  http://www.sacl.org.uk/

and the videos of his Channell 4 doc on how the Scottish law firm BRODIES ripped him off in these vids

  http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5DF05C485DDE5D20

Monday, 21 November 2011

ANTHONY SANCHEZ - NEW INTERVIEW NOV. 16 - FREEDOMISER RADIO

MUST LISTEN!!



ANTHONY SANCHEZ FREEDOMISER RADIO 16 NOV:



  http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Project-Camelot-32k-111611.mp3



ANTHONY SANCHEZ - AUTHOR OF "UFO HIGHWAY" - NOV 5 PROJ. CAMELOT I'VIEW



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9TbHOdCswY

the strange death of Dr. David Kelly

http://dr-david-kelly.blogspot.com/

Sunday, October 31, 2010


LETTER TO DOMINIC GRIEVE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM EXPERT IN PHARMACOLOGY, DR ANDREW WATT, BA, BMedBiol(Pathology), MBChB, MD(Hons), DipPharmMed,FRCP(Ed)

Open Letter to the Attorney General regarding the need for an inquest into the death of Dr David Kelly

Yesterday, I sent by recorded delivery a letter to Dominic Grieve QC, requesting that he apply to the High Court for an order that an inquest be held into the death of Dr David Kelly.

The text of that letter follows below, for reference.

25th October 2010

To:

Dominic Grieve AC

Attorney General

Open Letter

The Death of Dr David Kelly - information indicating that a Coroner-led inquest, taking evidence on oath, is needed.

Dear Attorney General

I write to you to request that you apply to the High Court for an order that a Coroner-led inquest be conducted with respect to the death of Dr David Kelly in 2003, as provided for on the grounds enumerated in Subsection 13(1)(b) of the Coroner's Act 1988.

Of the grounds mentioned in Subsection 13(1)(b) I consider the following grounds potentially to be of relevance in an application to the High Court with respect to the death of Dr David Kelly.

1. Rejection of evidence

2. Irregularity of proceedings

3. Insufficiency of inquiry

4. Discovery of new facts or evidence

As I read Subsection 13(1)(b) any one of these deficiencies is sufficient grounds on which to apply for an order from the High Court. Given persistent public concerns about how Dr Kelly met his death I find it difficult to conceive how the High Court could conclude otherwise than such an inquest in is the interests of justice.

I will list some causes for concern under each of the four headings previously mentioned. In some situations it is not immediately clear whether a particular point of concern should most appropriately be considered under a single heading or multiple headings. To avoid unnecessary repetition I will attempt to list a cause for concern under the single heading that appears to me to be most relevant.

The following lists do not purport to be exhaustive. They simply represent causes for concern that I observed after only a few hours reading the Hutton Inquiry transcripts, the Report and other potentially relvant material, as they refer to matters relating to the cause of death of Dr David Kelly.

Rejection of Evidence

Lord Hutton made it clear in his introductory statement that decisions about who to call to give evidence rested with him. It seems to me that a number of individuals who could potentially have given useful evidence regarding Dr Kelly's death were excluded from giving evidence. I can only assume that Lord Hutton rejected them as witnesses, hence my including them under the "Rejection of Evidence" heading. Lord Hutton's approach to the evidence of these individuals might equally be classified under the "insufficiency of inquiry" heading.

1. A Detective Constable Shields was stated (by DC Graham Coe) to have been present when DC Coe first saw Dr Kelly's body. DC Shields was not asked to give evidence.

2. Dr Eileen Hickey accompanied her colleague, the forensic biologist Dr Roy Green, and spent some 5 hours at the scene where Dr Kelly's body was found. Dr Hickey was not asked to give evidence, nor so far as I can ascertain was her area(s) of expertise explored by Hutton.

3. Dr Green testified that at least three Scenes of Crimes Officers were present at the scene. None was asked to give evidence of what they might have found or seen.

Irregularity of Proceedings

1. When evidence was taken from Dr Roy Green, forensic biologist, he stated in his testimony that his tests were ongoing. He was not asked to give further oral evidence and the results of his tests, so far as I am aware, are not known (at least I can find no public record of the results having been made available to the Hutton Inquiry, or alternatively, made publicly available by the Inquiry).

2. Supposedly, Assistant Chief Constable Page was to give evidence at his second appearance before Lord Hutton about the results of Dr Green's tests. He did not do so in any meaningful way and the absence of information about completed tests conducted by Dr Green was ignored by both Assistant Chief Constable Page and by the Hutton Inquiry. In any case, it was in my view highly irregular that someone who is not a technical expert should be asked to give evidence on a technical subject about which he has negligible or no expertise. In addition, the technical detail of Dr Green's tests was not investigated in oral questioning which seems to me to be grossly irregular and insufficient.

Insufficiency of Inquiry

There are numerous individual points where, so it seems to me, Lord Hutton was negligent in terms of conducting a credible and diligent inquiry, equivalent to an inquest.

TO BE CONTINUED....

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 7:47 AM 1 comments Links to this post Friday, August 27, 2010

LETTER REGARDING CO-PROXAMOL

This letter, from a retired anaesthetist - published in the Daily Telegraph on 24th August -speaks of the inconclusive nature of one of the secondary averred causes of Dr Kelly's death: co-proxamol poisoning.

'the fact that the blood level of Dp was so low as to be below that necessary for cardio-respiratory dpression suggests that not many tablets ever arrived in the stomach.'

Sir
If David Kelly (Letters, August 23) did not die from ulnar artery blood loss, then can we be sure that death was even due to cardio-respiratory depression after ingesting co-proxamol?

The drug contains dextropropoxyphene (Dp) and paracetemol. Paracetemol overdose can cause death but only in excess of three days after ingestion. Dp can cause death within one hour but usually within a mean of five hours.

As a retired anaesthetist with training in pharmacology, I noted that the stomach was empty of capsules, which indicates the Dp was totally absorbed. But the fact that the blood level of Dp was so low as to be below that necessary for cardio-respiratory depression suggests that not many tablets ever arrived in the stomach. An empty blister pack is not proof of ingestion.

Wrting as a citizen of this country, I feel that there are enough untidy ends in this sad saga to justify a coroner's inquest in which scene-of-crime officers and specialists in pharmacokinetics, forensic pathology, toxicology and vascular surgery can explain inconsistencies.

Dr David Rutter

Romsey, Hampshire

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 5:42 AM 0 comments Links to this post Wednesday, August 18, 2010

PISS AND WIND:

DAVID AARONOVITCH ON THE DEATH DAVID KELLY

Tim Wilkinson's lively critique of David Aaronovitch's article in

Saturday's 'Times' (14 August 2010)

'There is no mystery over David Kelly's death' proclaims the headline. Well, in one sense you might say that: no mystery, no esoteric ineffables, no transcendent unknown. Of course that is not the sense in which the headline is supposed to be taken - not officially - but it sounds a lot more plausible that 'no room for doubt', 'no stone left unturned, or 'no unresolved issues'.....

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 11:33 AM 3 comments Links to this post Monday, August 16, 2010

KELLY'S DEATH: INACCURACY IN MEDIA

by Rowena Thursby

According to a recent report in the Independent, a frog-like jump across the lilly pad has transmuted the cause of Dr David Kelly's death from "haemorrhage" (Hutton Inquiry) to "heart attack" (Independent): "Kelly had heart attack, says pathologist" blares the headline.

Dr Jennifer Dyson, a retired pathologist, tells an Independent reporter, "there seem to have been a lot of pills in his stomach". I am not sure she has paid close attention to the forensic reports given to the Hutton Inquiry. Possibly her words reflect a common assumption: that Dr Kelly ingested all 29 of the tablets missing from the three blister packs beside his body - but did he?

Other than the existence of three blister packs with 29 pills missing found at the death scene, there is no real indication that Dr Kelly took all 29 pills, voluntarily or otherwise. There is more evidence that he did not.

•At the Hutton Inquiry, forensic toxicologist Dr Richard Allan, clearly stated that he found only a fifth of one tablet in Dr Kelly's stomach. He did not find the residue of anything approaching 29 pills.

•Dried regurgatative material was found in a line from both corners of Dr Kelly's mouth to his ears - more was distrbuted on the ground beside his body. This suggests that a substantial amount of any drug ingested would have been ejected.

•Although Dr Allan found the amounts of the two components of co-proxamol in Dr Kelly's blood to be possibly consistent with an ingestion of 29 pills, he seemed puzzled that this quantity represented significantly less - more than half - than the amount that would normally cause a fatality.

•Dr Robert Forrest, Home Office forensic toxicologist at the University of Sheffield, points out in a BMJ article that after death, concentrations of a drug increase - sometimes up to tenfold. If that is the case, Dr Kelly may need only have ingested two or three pills for Dr Allan's findings to make sense.

•US army interpreter Mai Pederson, a close friend and colleague of Dr Kelly's towards the end of his life, maintains that he had a medical condition: "unexplained dysphagia" - a condition that makes it very difficult to swallow pills, while food is taken without any problem.

The Independent further records Dr Dyson as saying: "my suspicion would be that he had a coronary attack, brought on by the circumstances he found himself in and the stress that that entailed".

To is that to say, Dr Kelly was found dead in the woods, with wounds to his wrist, pill packets and a knife beside him, but that was just coincidental - he died of a heart attack, nothing to do with poisoning or blood loss? Or does Dr Dyson mean the combination of blood loss and poisoning probably caused a heart attack? Only the latter is plausible - but is it so?


In recent days The Times has published a letter (reproduced below) from nine eminent medical specialists - one of them, Sir Barry Jackson, ex-president of the Academy of Forensic Sciences and past surgeon to the queen. They aver that, absent a clotting abnormality, it is 'extremely unlikely' that anyone would bleed to death from a single severed ulnar artery. In recent television interviews two of them have maintained there is a strong consensus on this point across the medical profession.

Venturing opinions, especially medical ones, without reference to the facts of a case seeds false ideas which take root in the public mind. In fairness to Dr Dyson, she did not baldly state, as the headline claims, that Dr Kelly had a heart attack. The reporter turned her opinion into an assertion.

Lord Hutton's conclusions on how Dr Kelly met his death are unsafe. Even the forensic pathologist to the Hutton Inquiry, Dr Nicholas Hunt, told the news-team at Channel 4 News that he would be 'more comfortable' with an inquest.

Today's Daily Mail reports that only one person in five believes Dr Kelly committed suicide. This was no ordinary death - Dr Kelly was at the centre of a political furore which threatened to bring down the British government.

The medical details surrounding Dr Kelly's death and the circumstantial details are complex. The many facets of the case need to be gathered and forensically analysed with care by independent experts in a public forum. Witnesses must be supoenaed, give evidence under oath and be cross-examined. That diddn't happen at the Hutton Inquiry; a full inquest is essential.

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 12:00 PM 2 comments Links to this post Labels: co-proxamol, Dr David Kelly, heart attack

Saturday, August 14, 2010

DR KELLY WAS A BRILLIANT MAN WHO DID HIS BEST FOR HIS COUNTRY. WE OWE IT TO HIM AND TO OURSELVES TO DISCOVER THE TRUE CAUSE OF HIS DEATH.

In this powerfully argued article, doctor and barrister, Dr Michael Powers QC explains why justice demands an inquest is held.

Since his untimely death in July 2003, questions have continued to be raised about the circumstances of Dr David Kelly's death. Many wonder whether he really killed himself and speculate that he was murdered. His sudden death shocked the nation - how could it have happened?

As a specialist practioner in law and medicine, I feel a responsibility to the two professions to air my doubts about a case that bridges both worlds.

Any question of suicide or murder has to follow the determination of the cause of death. To do otherwise risks putting the cart before the horse. It would, for example, be scientifically and logically unsound to assume suicide and then to set about finding evidence to prove it.

Before asking whether the deceased himself or a third party put the bullet in the head, it is necessary to determine first that there was a hole in the head and secondly that the deceased died because of it.

For 1,000 years, coroners have been investigating sudden, violent and unnatural deaths. They have got good at it. Suicide used to be a crime and a finding of self-murder is an unhappy reflection on the victim and his family and friends.

That is why suicide has to be proved to the same high standard as murder. It has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt that the deceased did the act which killed him with that intention in mind.

The normal inquest process in the case of David Kelly was interrupted by the order of the Government. Lord Falconer, the Lord Chancellor at the time, exercised a rarely-used power to require the Oxfordshire coroner to adjourn his investigation and to give that responsibility to Lord Hutton.

The coroner had the power to compel witnesses to attend and to give evidence on oath. The Government which took our country to war with Iraq chose not to give these considerable powers to Lord Hutton.

Although there were 24 days of evidence taken over two and a half months, the whole of the medical evidence took no more than a half day. The evidence of the pathologist, toxicologist and forensic biologist can be read in 30 minutes. No one could say this was a detailed investigation into the death.

I was trained as a doctor and during my years in medical practice I often had to pass catheters into the radial artery in the wrist. This is where medics usually feel the pulse. It can even be seen pulsating in many people.

Dr Kelly's wrists were not slit. Neither radial artery was cut. This alone is a strange finding in someone who intends suicide by this method.

Deeper in the wrist on the side of the little finger lies the ulnar artery. It is not used for catheterisation because it is too small. Yet Lord Hutton, on the unchallenged evidence of a single pathologist, concluded that Dr Kelly bled to death from the severance of this single small artery in the left hand.

No courtroom drama would be complete without critical witnesses being challenged through the cross-examination process.

Like all barristers, I received a rigorous training in advocacy and, because of its enormous importance, I take time from my practice to train barristers in this art. A skilful cross-examination is often the key to ascertaining the truth.

None of this happened in Lord Hutton's inquiry and witnesses were simply led through prepared evidence. Reading the transcripts, far from providing any sense of satisfaction, leaves me with feelings of frustration. Opportunity after opportunity was lost to pursue answers until every avenue had been thoroughly explored and every "escape route " closed.

At the very end of his evidence, Dr Nichaols Hunt, the pathologist who had conducted the post-mortem, was asked: 'Is there anything else you would like to say concerning the circumstances leading to Dr Kelly's death?'

Such a question gives the witness who is favourably disposed to the questioner an open opportunity to go further than his witness statement. It is NOT a question ever asked in cross-examination as it provides a free pass to an escape route.

Dr Hunt answered: 'Nothing I could say as a pathologist, no'. He is an experienced expert witness. What on earth did that answer mean? He was there to give evidence as a pathologist. He knew that. Everyone knew that. So why did he give that answer? It begged the question whether there was anything else he knew. Was he concerned about any other forensic or factual evidence? These questions were never asked.

Hutton focused on the so-called dodgy dossier and the conflict between the Government and the BBC which, at that time, was more in the public eye. Because it was taken from granted Dr Kelly had killed himself, the medical evidence was insufficiently explored.

In the absence of any bleeding tendency from a clotting deficiency (and there was no evidence of this) fatal haemorrhage from a severed ulnar artery is so improbable that more evidence was essential before such a conclusion could be reached.

If you want to know how much beer has gone from a full pint glass, it is easy. You can either measure how much has been poured out or measure how much remains. To be confident, you would measure both. The same approach should have been adopted in this case.

As it was not, there is no evidence as to whether there was sufficient haemorrhage from the ulnar artery to cause death. The inquiry fell into the trap of the circular argument: Dr Kelly died, therefore he must have lost sufficient blood.

'In my work as a barrister I meet many medics but I have never met a single doctor who has disagreed with the propostion that is is extremely improbable that haemorrhage from a single, severed ulnar artery would ever be a primary cause of death.'

Yet this extreme unlikelihood was never explored with Dr Hunt. Whatever the reason, this was a serious failure of the Hutton Inquiry. It has understandably led to a suspicion of cover-up. This could not have been the cause of death, the argument goes. If it were not the cause, then what did cause his death? Was it something Dr Kelly did to himself, intending to cause his own death, which has not yet been discovered? Was it part of some elaborate plan by others to end his life?

The only way to stop the many theories which abound is for there now to be a thorough and open investigation by way of a fresh inquest. Surely the Government realises that the way to foster conspiracy theories is to be secretive and to resist calls to disclose all the medical evidence.

We should pay tribute to Dr Kelly. He was a brilliant man who did his best in the service of this country. He deserves our gratitude and respect. We owe it to him and ourselves to ensure the true cause of his death is ascertained.

Dr Michael J Powers QC is a barrister specialising in medical causation and a Fellow of the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians to which he is an appointed examiner.

From the "Mail on Sunday", 15 August 2010

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 2:49 PM 1 comments Links to this post Labels: Dr David Kelly, Dr Michael Powers, Hutton Inquiry

13th August 2010

VIDEO:

ITN - EXPERTS DEMAND FULL KELLY INQUEST

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 2:36 AM 0 comments Links to this post 13th August 2010

TIME FOR A PROPER INQUEST INTO DR KELLY'S DEATH

Sir

Amid the continuing interest surrounding the death of the government weapons inspector, the late Dr David Kelly, we wish to express our concern about the conclusion as to the cause of death in the light of the information now in the public domain. It is extremely unlikely, from a medical perspective, that the primary cause of death would or could have been haemorrhage from a severed ulnar arter in one wrist without any evidence of a blood clotting deficiency.

This small artery, deeper in the wrist than the larger radial artery used to palpate the pulse, would have retracted on being severed and within a short time blood loss would be expected to have ceased.

Insufficient blood would have been lost to threaten life. Absent a quantitative assessment of the blood lost and of the blood remaining in the great vessels, the conclusion that death occcurred as a consequence of haemorrhage is unsafe.

The inquiry by Lord Hutton was unsatisfactory with regard to the causation of death. A detailed investigation of all the medical circumstatnces is now required and we support the call for a proper inquest into the cause of Dr Kelly's death.

DR MICHAEL J POWERS QC

Barrister, Medical Practioner and Examiner to the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Royal College of Physicians

PROFESSOR JULIAN BION

Professor of Intensive Care Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham

DR MARGARET BLOOM

Barrister, Former General Medical Practioner and Fomer Deputy Coroner


DR NEVILLE DAVIS

Consultant Forensic Physician

DR ELIZABETH DRIVER

Solicitor and Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists

SIR BARRY JACKSON

Past president, British Academy of Forensic Sciences

DR JASON PAYNE-JAMES

Consultant Forensic Physician and Honorary Senior Lecturer, Cameron Forensic Medical Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry

PROFESSOR JOHN FRANCIS NUNN

DENIS WILKINS

Retired Consultant Vascular Surgeon

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 1:38 AM 2 comments Links to this post Sunday, January 24, 2010

LORD HUTTON INSTRUCTS DAVID KELLY'S POST MORTEM TO BE KEPT SECRET FOR 70 YEARS (for full report, click on title)

Not only the post-mortem report - all medical reports.

Access to unpublished evidence, including dozens of witness statements will be denied for 30 years.

•If Dr Kelly took his own life, why would all medical details need to be kept secret?

•Why keep them secret for 70 years?

•On what date did Lord Hutton make this ruling, and how?

•What justification did Lord Hutton use?

•Why was this ruling kept secret?

•Has such a ruling ever been made before in a case of this nature?

•Under what circumstances?

•How might this ruling be overturned?

Posted by Rowena Thursby at 3:51 PM 11 comments Links to this post Saturday, August 08, 2009

WATCH TELEVISED DEBATE:

THE STRANGE DEATH OF DR KELLY: WHY DO QUESTIONS STILL REMAIN?

The panel of four:

•Norman Baker MP

•Frances Swaine of Leigh, Day & Co solicitors

•Marc Sigsworth, Producer of the BBC 2 Conspiracy Files programme on Dr Kelly's death
•Nick Pope, MoD

MUST LISTEN!! ANTHONY SANCHEZ INTERVIEW 16 NOV.

Photobucket

MUST LISTEN!!

ANTHONY SANCHEZ FREEDOMISER RADIO 16 NOV:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/archive/Project-Camelot-32k-111611.mp3

ANTHONY SANCHEZ - AUTHOR OF "UFO HIGHWAY" - NOV 5 PROJ. CAMELOT I'VIEW

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9TbHOdCswY

...b.

Sunday, 20 November 2011

ALIEN STRUCTURES IN CHINA?

 

ALIEN STRUCTURES IN CHINA?

FROM:  http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2396409,00.asp

"It seems to be a question that comes up regularly: Have we found evidence of alien life forms? Conspiracy theorists are going nuts with some strange images from China's Gobi Desert found on Google Maps.

The first of these images was taken of some huge structures in Dunhuang, Jiuquan, Gansu, just north of the Shule River, Gizmodo said. This image is a rectangular grid that looks a bit like the entangling city streets without buildings. It's about a mile long and 3,000 feet wide. Fox said some have claimed this formation is a replica of the streets of Washington, D.C.

Another image was also taken north of the Shule River, Gizmodo said. This one is also a grid structure comprised of a series of squares that is littered with debris from exploded vehicles. Gizmodo noted that the image was taken west of a large electrical or radio station.

The Telegraph pointed out that all of the images were taking less than 100 miles from Jiuquan, which is where China's space program is headquartered. Could the images have some relation to alien life? Were they caused by UFOs? Is this China's version of Area 51?

The rest of the images are even more inexplicable. There's another grid made up of either squares or holes that iss more than 18 miles long. Another looks like a target with three jets in the middle and debris radiating out from the center. Gizmodo also discovered various unidentified buildings. One looks like an airport and another is a giant complex about 10 miles by five miles.

No one seems to have a concrete explanation of what these images are. It's possible Google Maps was hacked and a clever prankster inserted overlays that people have interpreted in rather wild ways.

What do you think? Give the images a look and share your thoughts in the comments." Thanks to Coasttocoast AM with G Noory + Nick Begich: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2011/11/15

Tags: china gobi desert nick begich alien structures

CIA COMPLICIT IN 90% OF WORLD HEROIN TRADE


Thursday, 17 November 2011

ALIEN KEPT IN FRIDGE IN RUSSIA!!

 SEE PICS   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061737/Marta-Yegorovnam-keeps-alien-fridge-Russian-woman-stores-corpse-2-years.html#ixzz1e0GXw3N9

Mystery of the 'alien corpse' woman stored in her fridge for two years (why do they all turn up in Russia?)

Russian woman kept alien before it was 'confiscated' by authorities

Third 'alien' sighting in Russia in recent months

Experts claim country is 'hotbed of UFO activity'
By Chris Parsons
If the aliens really are landing, this latest picture seems to confirm that their first port of call on Earth will be Russia.
After other claims of extraterrestrial life turning up in Siberia, the latest is from a Russian woman who says she kept a frozen alien corpse in her fridge.
The mysterious 'lifeform' was reportedly kept by Marta Yegorovnam in her fridge in the western Russian city of Petrozavodsk for two years, while she took five pictures to prove its existence.
Intelligent life? The 2ft high creature was apparently stored in Marta Yegorovnam's fridge in western Russia for two years
'Crash victim': The 'creature' was said to have been retrieved from a UFO crash site in 2009. It has an enormous head, bulbous eyes and one stick-like arm

Heading for Earth? The alien in Miss Yegorovnam's fridge has conveniently been removed by men from the 'Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences'

The 'body', the third alien sighting in Russian in recent months, was reportedly retrieved by Miss Yegorovnam from a UFO crash site near her summer house in 2009.
She says she approached the flaming wreckage and crumpled metal which she described as 'unbearably hot' and near the twisted hulk lay the dead alien.

Lost in space: Researchers say aliens may be in our solar system (we're just not looking hard enough to see them)

ET? We have never met him, insists the White House

RIGHTMINDS: It's a fridge Jim... but not as we know it

The 'creature' is two feet long, has an enormous head, large bulbous eyes and an appearance somewhere between a fish and a humanoid.

It also appears to have what looks like a string-like arm protruding from its body.

Proof at last? This screen grab shows an apparent UFO on the ground in Siberia earlier this year with what appears to be an unearthly being to its right and four other beings directly in front of the glowing craft
Naturally, Miss Yegorovnam did what most would in the same situation and stored the alien in her fridge for two years, according to Unexplained Mysteries.

The website reported that two men turned up at her home a few days ago and confiscated the corpse for investigative purposes, claiming to be from the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

'The possibility this could be a genuine alien should not be discounted'

The footage was unearthed by noted paranormal writer and expert Michael Cohen.
Mr Cohen, 40, said: 'This could be an elaborate hoax, however the possibility that this might be a genuine alien should not be discounted.
'Russia is a hotbed of UFO activity and possible alien craft has been tracked by both military and civilian agencies.

'In all likelihood most alien beings would look strange to us, much like this specimen.'

This latest claim from Russia comes after footage filmed in August in the remote Irkutsk region of Siberia appeared to show a strange glowing craft and five aliens walking about in the snow.

Alien life? This strange 'body' was said to have been discovered by two walkers close to Irkutsk, Siberia, in a renowned hotspot for extraterrestrial behaviour

Students Timur Hilall, 18, and Kirill Vlasov, 19, admitted their 'find' was just a stunt and the alien was made from bread

In April, two students who claimed to have recovered a body from a UFO crash site admitted that the creature was in fact made out of bread.

Timur Hilall, 18, and Kirill Vlasov, 19, shot the video that showed the alien's mangled remains frozen in snow, also in Irkutsk, Siberia.

The pair were questioned by police over their 'extraterrestrial discovery' but admitted to their stunt.

But not before their creation became an internet sensation, drawing almost 700,000 hits on YouTube.

Their find was deemed serious enough for the Kremlin to get involved and a spokesman from the Russian interior ministry confirmed the hoax.

THE DEATH OF STEPHEN LAWRENCE RIP 1993

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

MAURICE KIRK BEATEN BY PRISON WARDERS, WHILST ON HUNGER STRIKE

www.kirkflyingvet.com
The charge of "criminal damage" laid against Maurice Kirk {seen here pointing to the metal sheet covering where the safety-glass window was that he smashed whilst trying to escape illegal incarceration in Tottenham police station} has been dropped,{due to "lack of evidence" - how laughable as the evidence is plain to see - in the pic the window he smashed is shown replaced by a metal sheet, and the event was filmed by police CCTV in the room in the police station!! Such is the criminality in the British police!} lest the facts surrounding the MUSA case {of 6 illegally removed children from their Nigerian parents} came to light. Maurice is a supporter for the family and a strong campaigner for them, hence his silencing and diabolical treatment whilst in Cardiff prison. First - a beating. What next?
See more -  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/ ...b.
                  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"If you put me back into that prison, they will kill me." Cardiff Magistrates Court, Tuesday, Nov. 15th


These were Maurice's words as the Magistrates Court took a lunch break today.

His supporters saw his swollen ankles. He had told them not only about the freezing cell, but also the 17 prison officers who had beaten him. First and foremost prison officers 344 and 140.

The conspiracy to kill him is as fully fledged by South Wales Police regarding Maurice, as Haringey Council wants to see the Musa parents dead. For victims need to be silenced when they have evidence - whether it's about police corruption or child stealing.

It is dangerous to be right, when the state is wrong! It is not enough to falsely imprison him for nearly eight months, to take his computer, cheque books, credit cards and mobile phones.

If sectioning and bankrupting doesn't work, killing is the "last resort" for "royalle protected" criminals. Normal criminals at least need to fear prison!...

When leaving the court, one of the supporters asked whether he knew that the charges in Haringey were dropped yesterday. He asked "why didn't anybody tell the court?" But the judge ruled he won't take anything from the public gallery.

The four supporters heard Maurice tell the court that Prison Officer 395 had said "we have you in the block again and we're going to break you, you f... ing b...d.

Should Maurice die in prison, we at least know who the culprits are and who will be covered up, once again...

The limit of 56 days arrest is over this Thursday...

Can the magic of the internet save the lives of victims??? The Chaplain's telephone number is 02920 923 233.

He is due to be back in court in two weeks: Tuesday, 29th November.

Filed under: hm partnership, Machine Gun, magistrates court, hmp governor, hmp

Published Nov 15 2011, 01:19 PM by SabineKMcNeill

Comments

If you put me back into that prison, they will kill me.
Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police said:

Pingback from If you put me back into that prison, they will kill me.
Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

This from:  http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2011/11/15/quot-if-you-put-me-back-into-that-prison-they-will-kill-me-quot-cardiff-magistrates-court-tuesday-nov-15th.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.kirkflyingvet.com

JOHN L WALSON - FILMS HUGE OBJECTS IN SPACE + ON THE MOON



Real ufo's filmed john lenard walson, amateur astronomer astro photographer.



John Lenard Walson Moon 2011

Sunday, 13 November 2011

MESSAGE TO EVERY MP, LORD, + MANY PUBLIC FIGURES, M.A.P.P.A. LEAKED DOCS...

Dear Sir/Madam,

This message is being sent to every MP and many other public figures in an effort to tell you about the dreadful conspiracy involving the CPS Wales, the South Wales police, certain dubious members of the judiciary and others concerning MAURICE JOHN KIRK, who has been on hunger strike in Cardiff prison for some weeks because of certain matters. His own reasons for being on hunger strike are detailed below in his own list.

Maurice Kirk has been denied many of his human rights whilst in prison and in the courts. Bail applications have been refused to be given to the courts, to name just one right hes been refused. Fake medical reports have been fabricated which ensured Mr. Kirk was imprisoned, not for the first time, with a view to have him permanently sectioned to a secure mental hospital forever, despite the medical report being totally false based on complete lies - I would ask you to specifically check the report made by a certain doctor regarding Mr. Kirk having a brian tumour - he most definatly does not and this false report made by a certain doctor was believed in court before which had Mr. Lirk nearly sent to a mental hospital forever AND IS BEING USED AGAIN in the same manner in Mr. Kirks upcoming court case.

What I say is no fabrication as this report was, neither do I hoax or joke.

Certain parties wish Mr. Kirk silenced forever because of what he can divulge, hence the false report to get him locked away forever. However, Mr. Kirk has a strong network of supporters who only wish is that justice is done, and is seen to be done, and it is with that principal I write to you today to tell you of these gross breaches of the law by certain people trying to imprison Mr. Kirk forever because of what he knows about certain things.

The attatched MAPPA pages show many irregularities, as do his phone and written messages I have recorded and put on my site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com , along with his letters and other details which show the corruption and other travesties of the law he speaks of by what should be reputable, responsible authority figures. They most definatly are not. They are biased to cover up their own crimes, and crimes of their so-called "friends" in high places.

I have tried to alert the authorities as to what is going on regarding these outright perversions of justice in our courts regarding Mr. Kirk but all I have received back is a message of sarcasm from an organisation who should know better - the "South Wales Police"

From:Cardiff@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

Sent:31 October 2011 11:59:17

To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Cc: ACPO.Staff.Office@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

I have not replied to the e-mail, I presume you will make a corporate response.

Regards

Sue Fox 50231

Clerical Officer/Swddog Clerigol South Wales Police Eastern BCU/Heddlu De Cymru URhS Y DwyrainProperty OfficeRumney Police Station713 Newport RoadCardiff

Should these people not be dealing with the conspracy against this man Maurice J. Kirk and the laws that have been broken rather that sending meaningless sarcastic messages which clearly show they intend to do nothing regarding the many laws that have been broken and overlooked regarding Mr. Kirks outright victimisation and illegal incarceration? The message I had sent to the party above told of the prison denying even Mr. Kirk was on hunger strike at all, that they had refused to weigh him, give him medical treatment for bleeding stomach ulcers, refused him admission to a hospital according to "orders of someone high up" - even denying him a blanket for his freezing cell, and other sundry denials. Surely these people are paid very highly to act more responsibly and not to waste valuable police time writing to me to show their outright contempt of the laws they are meant to uphold.

I would ask you to please look at my detailing of Mr. Kirks plight at the site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com and at Mr. Kirks own site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com and http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com where he details the unacceptable crimes against him by authority figures who are paid very highly by us, the taxpayer, to uphold the laws and not to break them.

This is a true sworn statement.

Thank you.

this message sent to every MP and EuroMP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE 27 OCT.: MAURICE KIRK – LETTER TO CPS, WALES

Posted on October 27, 2011 by butlincat

From: butlincat

Sent: 27 October 2011 17:18:32

To: wales.communications@cps.gsi.gov.uk; cardiff@south-wales.pnn.police.uk; headquarters@south-wales.pnn.police.uk; acpo.staff.office@south-wales.pnn.police.uk; admin@number10.gov.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; lammyd@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; lynne.featherstone.mp@parliament.uk; andersonda@parliament.uk; blunkettd@parliament.uk; camerond@parliament.uk; picklese@parliament.uk; pickles@communities.gsi.gov.uk; cablev@parliament.uk; clarkek@parliament.uk; coopery@parliament.uk; president@whitehouse.gov; president@po.gov.za; press.int@aljazeera.net; emma.finch@parliament.uk; cleggn@parliament.uk; milibande@parliament.uk; haguew@parliament.uk; bellinghamh@parliament.uk; nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu; john_hemming_onholiday@hotmail.com; john.hemming@john.hemming.name; hedleylester@gmail.com; hemmingj@parliament.uk; swansea@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

+ cc’d 109 others

Dear MPs and worldwide media,

Sir,

This is a message concerning Mr. MAURICE KIRK who is at present on hunger strike in Cardiff prison – no. A7306AT.

The process of law is not being allowed for this man, hence my notifying you, the Crown Prosecution Service Wales, and your police force, and many media worldwide. His basic Human Rights have been taken away by prison staff, police, and you – Crown Prosecution Service, Wales.

Mr. Kirk has been trying to appeal:

ref. BS614159 KIRK v S WALES POLICE

Mr. KIRK and was prevented from going to court on the 28th September – the prison refused to give Mr. Kirk appeal documents to file an appeal – the county court on the 17 October 2011 answered his letter saying they were refusing to give him Court of Appeal papers.

You are hereby notified of these actions.

Whilst in prison Maurice Kirk has been denied a doctor for the last 2 weeks, has lost 14 kg since his entry into Cardiff prison, and has bleeding stomach ulcers which demand medical attention which the prison has refused. All mail is now refused for Mr. Kirk in prison, and he is in an unheated cell and has been refused blankets to compensate for the cold, and other basic rights such as being denied the purchase of postage stamps.

More importantly has also been denied access to the hospital because of “orders from someone high up”.

This message will be sent {and was} by Recorded Delivery Royal Mail on the 28th Oct. 2011 to:

CPS Wales

20th Floor, Capital Tower

Greyfriars Road

Cardiff CF10 3PL

and to others.

From Maurice Kirk 25 Oct. 2011:

FAO HMP Cardiff Governor / Cardiff Courts

1. I am on hunger strike because I am being refused a proper application for bail and to have my medical records clarified or corrected.

2. Also, both South Wales Police and HM Prison have conspired to confiscate my legal papers, computer, cash and proper access to both telephone and secretarial facilities to defend myself.

3.More importantly, the current reason for ‘HM Partnership Wales’ conspiracy to pervert the

course is just to block my access to both the civic and criminal courts in the UK, in my civil action for damages due to 20 years of South Wales Police bullying.

4. 17 Oct 2011 county Court letter indicates my appeal for further disclosure of 10 MAPPA meetings,in both police stations and their forensic Laboratory, Caswell Clinic, was dismissed as I failed to attend on 28th Sept. 2011.



5. Likewise with BS614159, appeals FD10C00242, FD10C00195 and current JRs,including CO/4298/2011 again because prison refuses my request to contact the court.

6. HHJ N. Cooke QC refuses, with Cardiff Magistrates, to consider my private persecution information laid against Dr Williams for falsifying my medical evidence at the request of the Police.

7.‘HM Partnership’ Wales refused to provide me of notify my legal representative alternativein my place, for High Court and administrative court 28th Sept & 4th Oct hearings, knowing Iwas seriously incapacitated during the first two weeks in my current remand in custody to face a Section 2 Harassment Act 1997 complained by Dr T Williams.

8. In September 11 I was transferred from London Police custody for ‘tape recording in court’,

attempting to breakout of Tottenham Police Station, demanding my own lawyers hand over my own legal papers and best of this nonsense, conspiracy by aeroplane to abduct 6 young Nigerian children snatched by Haringey Council.

9. Cardiff Prison refuse me my legal papers, basic stationery to be able to interview my own defence witnesses or get proper medical attention.

10. By Sept 11 letters, the Independent Police Complaints Commission IPCC have given the South Wales Police dispensation from an enquiry of their ‘shoot to kill’ policy and painting the ‘machine gun’ a different colour to fool the Jury.

11. HM Prison refuses to release my faxes from my lawyer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Police force describes inspector who was part of South Wales paedophile ring as 'abhorrent'

Robin Turner, WalesOnlineOct 28 2011

 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2011/10/28/police-force-describes-inspector-who-was-part-of-south-wales-paedophile-ring-as-abhorrent-91466-29677454/#ixzz1dcTaJxuM
 
Photobucket
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE 5 LEAKED M.A.P.P.A. PAGES CONCERNING M. KIRK


Posted on November 13, 2011 by butlincat

hit Maurice on the face. Security guard came over to see what was occurring and laid hands on

Maurice. Maurice brushed his hands off. Was charged and convicted of assault.

SECOND MAPPA MEETING 20.08.09

• The most recent MAPPA meeting was held on 20 August 2009. At this meeting, it was confirmed

that during a recent search of the premises at St. Donats, firearms were seized – which were all

legally held. Also seized were some antique weaponry and some veterinary firearms. Antique

firearms do not need certification and have been returned, veterinary items also. The machine gun

has been recovered. It is a prohibited weapon. Is capable of being fired. All firearm certificates have

been revoked – Mrs Kirk has only recently been informed of this.

• It was discussed that the Civil Aviation Authority has recently temporarily suspended Maurice’s

licence – in July 2009 – as a result of being charged with recent offences.

• It was confirmed that, to date, Maurice has been charged with two firearms offences:

Possession of a prohibited weapon and Sale of a prohibited weapon (N.B. at my last interview with

Maurice, he informed that he had been charged with a third offence???)

• The meeting discussed that if Maurice was unable to attend court at any time, his levels of stress

would be likely to increase. The risk of media attention on these occasions was also discussed -

police will be the lead agency in management of that risk.

• I am not absolutely clear on the sequence of events but I understand that on 24 June 2009,

Maurice was granted unconditional bail in the Magistrates Court (query offences). Mrs Kirk has

informed that, on the following day, Maurice was in the Crown Court when the CPS opposed bail and

has been remanded in custody ever since. The MAPPA meeting reviewed that on 6 July, he appeared

in court via video link wishing to apply for bail. Bail not granted at that time. Was advised to seek

legal advice. Legal papers to be served and case management hearing dates set for 17 August and 1

September in Cardiff Crown Court. On 16 July in Cardiff Crown, Maurice had made an application for

bail in writing. Mrs Kirk was there with barrister. Maurice Kirk refused legal representation and

refused to appear via video link, therefore, bail application did not proceed. Judge orders psychiatric

assessment.

28 July 2009 – further bail hearing scheduled. Maurice given the opportunity to attend. Barricaded

self in cell; refused to leave. 7 August – hearing in the Crown Court. Interim report by Dr Williams

considered. Maurice represented himself. Confirmed he was on hunger strike. Judge allowed him to

provide a verbal account for some time. On the basis of that account and the psychiatric report, the

judge decided a Section 35. It was also reviewed at this meeting that the police are taking very

careful advice and guidance regarding the procedure of the criminal case in light of the fact that they

are also the subject of civil complaint.

• Police to provide me with details of Maurice’s previous violent offending history.

• Further MAPPA meeting scheduled for 1 October.

FOURTH CONTACT WITH MAURICE KIRK 26.08.09

I met with Maurice to continue gathering life history information for the Peer Review case

conference. Maurice confirmed that he had studied for his vet qualification from autumn 1963 to

January 1969. Informed “/ kept failing exams, couldn’t cope with academic pressure”. What should

have taken four and a half years took five and a half to complete.

We revisited the three assaults that he talked about at our last meeting. With regard to the first

assault, Maurice informed that the “burglar” had been an associate of the previous tenants and

therefore had keys to the property. In another confusing account, Maurice appeared to inform that

he interrupted her in the process of picking up things of value and had thrown her out of the

property. Later, she had reported his “assault of her”. Maurice confirmed that she was never

charged with burglary.

Maurice informed that his conflict with South Wales Police escalated from January 2004 after he was

struck off by the RCVS. Maurice informed that the police had notified the RCVS of his previous

offending history. By doing this, he considers that both the police and the RCVS broke the rules and

regulations that were in existence at that time. Maurice informed that, at that point, the RCVS did

not require notification about anything that would bring the profession into disrepute, but that this

rule has changed and nowadays such information is required to be notified.

Maurice informing that it was this information about his criminal past that influenced the RCVS

decision. He also said that information had been passed on to the RCVS regarding his attitude with

the general public when he was called out by police officers to attend an incident where it was

thought that two dogs had gone over the cliff. Maurice explained the context of his response. Was

exhausted, had just spent a considerable amount of time single- handedly replacing a cow’s womb,

had just got home and soaking in the bath when the police called for his assistance. Described not

wanting to be bothered with members of the public – his only concern was for the dogs’ welfare.

Maurice informed that he considers himself to be the subject of a police vendetta in Taunton, then

Guernsey, then South Wales. He informed that he has experienced no harassment from police in

France currently. Maurice informed that, even what he has reported crime and has been the victim,

police have refused to investigate. Maurice also informed that he has been locked up on many

occasions for having no driving licence – which is later admitted to be a “computer error”.

We returned to the issue of previous imprisonment during Genevieve’s lifetime. At our last meeting,

Maurice had informed that this was his first period of imprisonment that Genevieve had

experienced. Reminded him of his eight day detention in Texas. Maurice informed that he thought

the impact of everything now was greater on Genevieve because she has “more awareness now”.

Maurice informed “I don’t think Texas touched her”.

We considered the issue of vexatious litigant. Maurice informed that the process had started just as

he was struck off by the RCVS. Maurice informed that the Attorney General instructed a team of

lawyers to cause all his court records in Wales and South West England to be taken to London.

Maurice informed that this amounted to 300 court cases, of which 200+ related to his pursuit of bad

debts re the vet practice. In 2006 an ECRO was issued which lasted for two years. I understand that

this is a time restricted civil restraint order, which means that Maurice cannot pursue any legal

action without going through the High Court first. Maurice informed that in June 2009 a second

ECRO was issued. Maurice informed that the RCVS had asked for this. In his view, this adds further

weight to proof of conspiracy.

Maurice discussed that his wish is to leave Wales. With regard to his ongoing court cases, he would

wish to find lawyers that he can trust to represent him and “leave it to them”. Maurice informed

that, if he told the courts that he no longer wished to pursue the various cases, he would be liable to

in excess of £25,000 costs/fines, etc.

Maurice informed that he recognised that he was stressed and that it may be to a degree that he is

currently suffering from a stress disorder. He was not sure about this but has been doing quite a lot

of thinking and has taken advice from several “psychiatrist friends”, who are advising him on the

telephone, etc.

Maurice referred on several occasions to “HM conspiratorial partnerships”. He also informed that he

had been advised by his psychiatrist friends not to use the word “conspiracy” in his discussions with

the Caswell team. He however expounded on his views that the judicial system is controlled by the

government, that he has proof of conspiracy and that he considers himself and others to be victims

of this.

During the course of our time together, the Ward Manager came to inform Maurice of Dr Jones and

Dr Williams’ absence from the clinic currently and, therefore, their inability to read the recent

documents he has sent to them. Maurice asked when they would be able to read the documents

and the Ward Manager replied 01.09.09. Maurice informed “that’s too late” and seemed extremely

agitated and distressed. He informed that it was imperative that they read the documents before his

court appearance on 1 September. Ward Manager informed that she was waiting for clarification

from the court regarding his court appearance on the 1st. There was some discussion about this but

clearly Maurice received this as further proof of our involvement in conspiracy to prevent him from

attending court, applying for bail, etc, etc.

Maurice cut short our interview, saying that “I have been warned not to let my guard down in here”.

“I can’t speak to you any more”. After about five minutes, he approached the nursing office and

requested to speak to me. He brought a file with him and informed that, although he had not meant

to show me certain documents, he was now forced to do so as he needed someone to read these

documents as a matter of urgency so that we could understand that his concern about conspiracy is

real and not imagined. I could not detract Maurice from his assertions. He turned up a witness

statement taken in 1995 which made mention of a certain police officer’s name. Maurice became

visibly quite agitated trying to find the relevant comments in the statement. He was unable to find

the comments that he thought were contained in the statement. Although Maurice initially indicated

that he could continue with our discussions, after about five minutes he excused himself very

appropriately, saying that when we had met last time he had been “with me”, had wanted to answer

my questions and participate in our discussions. However, currently, he explained that he was

distracted and preoccupied and, for these reasons, was bringing our interview to an end. POLICE

INTELLIGENCE

I have been given a copy of Maurice’s Guernsey Police records, which do not show on his PNC

because they are particular to his records in Guernsey. There are a few gaps in the print out which

apparently refer to about 26 missing road traffic offences and there is no modus operandi available

with regard to any of the records convictions on that print out.

I have also been given sight of the South Wales Police Force Intelligence Bureau confidential

information headed Specialist Crime Operations and Intelligence Division.

Information from that document is as follows:

Background – Maurice born on 12.03.45 in Taunton. Father, Dennis 1912-2007 – hard working

country vet. Mother, Violet, daughter of a well-known industrial chemist and inventor in the

confectionery business. Their immediate family – five boys and one girl – M, C, Maurice, R and twins T

and C. D’ s brother, Maurice, an officer in the Royal Army Veterinary Corps, died in Northern France

a few days before Maurice’s birth, hence their third son being named in honour of him.

Maurice’s interests as a boy – hunting, shooting, fishing. Later as a young man mountaineering,

rugby, old vintage cars, seeing the world. 1963 – began a veterinary career studying at Bristol

University. During that time also became a climbing instructor in North Wales, hitchhiked 8,000

miles around North America and paddled the English Channel in a home made canoe, after

swimming the Iron Curtain at the height of the Cold War. He hitched, jumped trains or hid in the

back of trucks to get across Australia, New Guinea and New Zealand. Also commissioned into Royal

Air Force Reserve. Seems his father inspired his passion in both veterinary medicine and flying

anything. He obtained qualifications, experience, commercial licence and has several injuries ? from

his flying exploits. Married 1970 to Janet, three children. 1998 – second marriage. , There are six

offences that show between 1978 and 1980 – see attached.

1984 – first summoned to a disciplinary hearing at the RCVS. Reason for the hearing was in

connection with the conviction dated January 1978 – ABH. The issue was that the conviction was of a

nature to bring the veterinary profession into disrepute. The committee commented that it had

heard nothing in Maurice’s approach to the hearing “to suggest an unwillingness to abide by the

rules of your profession”. They implied that they had issued a warning and went on to comment that

continued conflict with authority ”must inevitably affect not only yourself but also your profession

by bringing it into disrepute

1988 – it appears that there was a similar hearing. The chairman of the same committee “your

contact has brought your chosen profession into the gravest disrepute” and “your prospects of being

able to remain a member of this profession depend upon your own behaviour hereafter”. Then

there are another four convictions that are shown between 1995 and 2000.

29.05.02 – he appeared before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ Disciplinary Committee,

who commented that they find him unfit to practice as a veterinary surgeon on the basis of any one

or more of the convictions listed. The committee directed his name to be removed from the register.

They went on to comment “it seems quite obvious to this committee that Mr Kirk has no intention

and is possibly not capable of altering his behaviour”.

Maurice appealed but in January 2004 the decision was upheld. Lord Hoffman of the Lords of the

Judicial Committee stated “this is a very unusual case. Mr Kirk has an inherited love of veterinary

surgery and there is no question about his dedication and competence. Mr Kirk’s problem is with

people.

He combines independence of spirit and a passion for justice with a flaming temper and complete

insensitivity to the feelings of others. He sees conspiracies under every bush and believes on

principle that all members of the police and legal profession are dishonest and corrupt. He can be

abrasive with animal owners and abusive – sometimes violent – towards any of the substantial

number of people who he regards as enemies of justice. The result of this explosive mixture of

admirable and less admirable qualities has been a long series of incidents which have brought Mr

Kirk into conflict with the law. They have also produced a succession of complaints to the Royal

Veterinary College. Over the years Mr Kirk, without legal assistance, has defended himself against

literally dozens of prosecutions on at least two previous disciplinary proceedings. On many such

occasions he has been successful and, when he has not, he has indomitably paid fines and

undergone imprisonment, only to return to the fray. But now the college has had enough and the

disciplinary committee has decided that his behaviour has been such as to make him unfit to

practice”.

02.05.08 – Maurice arrested by the United States Secret Service after landing his light aircraft in a

field five miles away from the Prairie Chapel Ranch, the residence of President George Bush,

demanding an audience with him. Was immediately conveyed to a psychiatric hospital for

evaluation. Once it was established that he posed no immediate threat to the President, he was

deported as an undesirable due to his previous convictions. Maurice believes that South Wales

Police is responsible for or blames the force for having him struck off.

November 2008 – Judge Chambers orders further disclosures to be served upon Kirk by the 05.01.09.

15.02.09 – Chief Constable serves an affidavit, together with other documents, on the course

outlining her case.

27.02.09 – Maurice attends the gatehouse of South Wales Police and attempts to gain entry in order

to arrest the Chief Constable for fraud and perjury. Escorted off the premises.



———————————————————————



Police force describes inspector who was part of South Wales paedophile ring as ‘abhorrent’

■Robin Turner, WalesOnline

■Oct 28 2011 - Read More

 http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2011/10/28/police-force-describes-inspector-who-was-part-of-south-wales-paedophile-ring-as-abhorrent-91466-29677454/#ixzz1dcTaJxuM

■————————————————————————

■LETTER 13 NOV. TO EVERY MP + LORD + OTHER PUBLIC FIGURES WHO ARE MEANT TO HELP PEOPLE WHO ARE OPPRESSED OR TORTURED:

■Dear Sir/Madam,

This message is being sent to every MP and many other public figures in an effort to tell you about the dreadful conspiracy involving the CPS Wales, the South Wales police, certain dubious members of the judiciary and others concerning MAURICE JOHN KIRK, who has been on hunger strike in Cardiff prison for some weeks because of certain matters. His own reasons for being on hunger strike are detailed below in his own list.

Maurice Kirk has been denied many of his human rights whilst in prison and in the courts. Bail applications have been refused to be given to the courts, to name just one right hes been refused. Fake medical reports have been fabricated which ensured Mr. Kirk was imprisoned, not for the first time, with a view to have him permanently sectioned to a secure mental hospital forever, despite the medical report being totally false based on complete lies – I would ask you to specifically check the report made by a certain doctor regarding Mr. Kirk having a brian tumour – he most definatly does not and this false report made by a certain doctor was believed in court before which had Mr. Lirk nearly sent to a mental hospital forever AND IS BEING USED AGAIN in the same manner in Mr. Kirks upcoming court case.

What I say is no fabrication as this report was, neither do I hoax or joke.

Certain parties wish Mr. Kirk silenced forever because of what he can divulge, hence the false report to get him locked away forever. However, Mr. Kirk has a strong network of supporters who only wish is that justice is done, and is seen to be done, and it is with that principal I write to you today to tell you of these gross breaches of the law by certain people trying to imprison Mr. Kirk forever because of what he knows about certain things.

The attatched MAPPA pages show many irregularities, as do his phone and written messages I have recorded and put on my site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com , along with his letters and other details which show the corruption and other travesties of the law he speaks of by what should be reputable, responsible authority figures. They most definatly are not. They are biased to cover up their own crimes, and crimes of their so-called “friends” in high places.

I have tried to alert the authorities as to what is going on regarding these outright perversions of justice in our courts regarding Mr. Kirk but all I have received back is a message of sarcasm from an organisation who should know better – the “South Wales Police”

From:Cardiff@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

Sent:31 October 2011 11:59:17

To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Cc: ACPO.Staff.Office@south-wales.pnn.police.uk

■NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

■I have not replied to the e-mail, I presume you will make a corporate response.

■Regards

Sue Fox 50231

Clerical Officer/Swddog Clerigol South Wales Police Eastern BCU/Heddlu De Cymru URhS Y DwyrainProperty OfficeRumney Police Station713 Newport Road Cardiff

Should these people not be dealing with the conspracy against this man Maurice J. Kirk and the laws that have been broken rather that sending meaningless sarcastic messages which clearly show they intend to do nothing regarding the many laws that have been broken and overlooked regarding Mr. Kirks outright victimisation and illegal incarceration? The message I had sent to the party above told of the prison denying even Mr. Kirk was on hunger strike at all, that they had refused to weigh him, give him medical treatment for bleeding stomach ulcers, refused him admission to a hospital according to “orders of someone high up” – even denying him a blanket for his freezing cell, and other sundry denials. Surely these people are paid very highly to act more responsibly and not to waste valuable police time writing to me to show their outright contempt of the laws they are meant to uphold.

I would ask you to please look at my detailing of Mr. Kirks plight at the site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/ and at Mr. Kirks own site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/ and http://www.mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/ where he details the unacceptable crimes against him by authority figures who are paid very highly by us, the taxpayer, to uphold the laws and not to break them.

This is a true sworn statement.

Thank you.

this message sent to every MP and EuroMP

...b.