butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

butlincat's blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

This site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they have been since. "Shadowbanning" is the act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community - see more: What is SHADOWBANNING: Twitter: are you shadowbanned? - truther sites are targeted, eg: NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media - "Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others." - Charles Bukowski

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption”...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

...hello + welcome!....FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License..... For more information please visit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Targeted? victimised?...been dealt particularly "rough justice"? meet some who have, and still are! VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

This blog is for regular updates + info connected to the ILLUMINATI, 911, 7/7, recent UFO sightings, CHEMTRAILS, MORGELLONS [98% OF WORLDS POPULATION HAS MORGELLONS DISEASE, they claim - see #Morgellons & #SmartDust Infect Individuals to be Tracked via Satellite https://www.youtu.be/RvNDk2t8TGk], MIND CONTROL {MK ULTRA.MANNEQUIN etc.}, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, JOHN LEAR, ALEX COLLIER, PROJECT CAMELOT, PROJECT AVALON, MICHAEL TSARION, JORDAN MAXWELL, PRESTON NICHOLS, AL BIELEK, STEWART SWERDELOW, DUNCAN CAMERON, WILLIAM COOPER, PHIL SCHNEIDER, David Wilcock, FRITZ SPRINGMEIER, BILLY MEIER, MAX IGAN, STEW WEBB, "Democracy Now!", Henry Makow, Linda Moulton-Howe, Dan Burisch, Webster Tarpley, Brother Nathanael, Timothy Good, Miles Johnson, Jim Marrs, John Hutchison, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Dr. John Hall, Edward Snowden, Vladimir Putin, John Lennon, Bob Zimmerman + many more who can only be described as heroes...

Wordpress: VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/butlincat

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/butlin.cat.9

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap." Galatians 6:7

......Namaste.....John Graham - butlincat

Jai guru deva om जय गुरुदेव ॐ


Sunday, 30 September 2012

BOWIE - PANIC IN DETROIT UNRELEASED THIN WHITE DUKE REHEARSALS '76

STEW WEBB - THE OKLAHOMA BOMBING - WHAT REALLY HAPPENED


Listen to internet radio with Nsearch Radio on Blog Talk Radio
We're doing an encore broadcast of the very detailed report Stew Webb gave Nsearch Radio about the Oklahoma City bombing earlier this year. This was an incredible interview that yielded some new information such as the confirmed Intel that Stew Webb received that Timothy McVeigh NEVER died for his supposed crime of blowing up the Federal Building. Instead he got the "back door" treatment! Listen to this interview tonight at 9:00 EST by clicking the PLAY button on

http://www.project.nsearch.com

or  http://www.nsearch.com

or by calling in by phone at (858) 683-1309 You can hear the last 5 programs anytime through the player at the top of www.project.nsearch.com EMERGENCY - Stew Webb Needs Your Help! Stew Webb also informed me that he is in DIRE need to pay a $200 bill on Monday and has no money to pay it right now. So PLEASE consider donating $5 or $10 or whatever you can over at www.stewwebb.com so he can keep fighting for the American people. Nobody else has had the guts to do what Stew Webb has done to the corrupt shadow government and their stooges. He really needs your support this weekend and needs a miracle of $200 by Monday! Hear ALL our shows anytime! Remember, you can also hear ALL of our archived shows through Itunes by searching the Podcasts for "Nsearch Radio" and you can also hear them on the Internet at this link.

 http://www.blogtalkradio.com/nsearchradio Visit Project Nsearch at: h

http://www.project.nsearch.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Saturday, 29 September 2012

UPDATED COMMENTS: SIR N WALL RETIRES

WALL RETIRES - THANK GOD!!

President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires

28FridaySep 2012 from: http://researchingreform.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/president-of-the-family-division-sir-nicholas-wall-retires/
Working within the confines of the courts and the limits of the law, Sir Nicholas was one of the more outspoken judges of his time and certainly pioneered radical discussion on increasing rights for unmarried couples, implementing no-fault divorce and more access to the family courts through media reporting to help increase transparency inside the system. He was also kind enough to take time out of his busy schedule to be a panel member for our Westminster Debate for KIDS.
We will be sorry to see him leave and wish him a quick recovery. However, the question which remains, is who will take Sir Nicholas’s place, as the new President of the Family Division?
AND WHO IS "WE" I WONT BE SORRY AT ALL - IN FACT ILL REJOICE - WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MUSA FAMILY IS A PUBLIC SCANDAL!!

7 thoughts on “President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires”
  1. forcedadoption said:
    September 28, 2012 at 5:27 pm
    I hope L.J.Wall makes a swift recovery but I am certainly NOT sad to see him go !He claimed that Christopher Booker had made errors in his column because judge Bellamy said so when in fact Bellamy took some facts off my forced adoption site two days before Christopher’s article was published (without mistakes !) ;He then blamed Christopher for my mistake and so did Wall ! Flattering that judges read my website however ! Even worse he stigmatised Vicky Haigh,relying he said on two judges.(both their judgements are now on line)In fact the first judge (Robertshaw) merely thought it probable that she coached her child to make allegationS about her father,the second judge relied entirely on the report of the first judge and Wall admitted relying on both of them ! Hardly fair to denigrate Vicky publicly on such flimsy evidence.He emphasised that Vicky did not appeal,when in fact her lawyers just did not take the necessary action ,.something a Wall knows well that happens quite regularly in the family courts; One thing he did get right however ….. Extract from the TIMES April13th 2010)
    “Lord Justice Wall (The Senior family court judge) said that the determination of some social workers to place children in an “unsatisfactory care system” away from their families was “quite shocking
  2. Nicholas Wall, I wish you a long and happy retirement. I am in two minds as to whether it should have been extended by your having retired earlier. I have needed to follow you particularly closely since you accepted the President position, despite the express wish to the contrary of the Lord Chancellor at that time.
    It is my opinion that you inherited a hopeless position and that scenario was produced in part by yourself. Perhaps it is rough justice then that you were given the task of cleaning up the family division. In the Pythonesque irony so typical of the family division, there really was nobody better qualified to identify and deal with the rot. A bit like tying a bomber to his home made, tamper-proof bomb and instructing him to defuse it. Couldn’t have been very healthy for you.
    Sadly, you will always be remembered for the PC&S case. Perhaps now you are out of office you could finally apologise, not just to the family, but to the nation tainted. In this case, you were easily led; so much so, that you actually joined in with the unwarranted fabrication of a case where there was none against the mother. You denied her representation; you denied her any communication for assistance with anybody outside of the court. You subjected her to these conditions for several days in court. Then you took her baby. You showed the social services and their local authority lawyers how easily led busy judges can be, simply by using Orwellian narrative techniques. You opened the floodgates for child-snatchers before Baby P, and now there is no closing them. But that was before you became President.
    In private law, you blew it in 2003. ‘Making Contact Work.’ As ever, a conflict of interest bunch of the wrong people blabbing about the pros and cons of shared parenting. The predictable result was that somehow no move forwards in that area of law that over-feeds the socio-legal professions would happen. But we watched nonetheless to see how you would manage to do it. You ended with a phrase that went something like this: “Yes we can see how (a legal presumption of) shared parenting would help, but we cannot see how it would function in efficacy.” Like Clive Baldwin wrote of you, after PC&S, ‘who needs fact when you have narrative?’ The American Bar Association is more honest; they state they do not like shared parenting as a presumption in law because half their income would disappear. The British public are tired of being insulted by successive Presidents’ use of transparent, specious and shallow justifications for evading their obligations in private law. Your retort to the criticisms of family law professionals’ profiteering that “there are many altruistic people in family law” did not make it clear whether you included yourself. Hundreds of thousands of damaged and separated families, and especially, separated children and fathers, would counter such a self-inclusion. You should have been monitoring the courts and booting out those who are not altruists, rather than providing shelter for them. Titling something as ‘Making Contact Work’ whilst deliberately going in the opposite direction, with all those involved soaking up public money is the root of Broken Britain.
    Rejecting the Early interventions Pilot Project recently when all around you had signed it off (despite stating yourself in 2003 that such a pilot project was a necessity) and failing to define ‘meaningful contact’ at any stage in your career, merely reinforces any opinion of your contemptuous indifference to the suffering of most of the children whose futures were to be decided in your courts. Contact didn’t work in 2003, and does not work upon your stepping down as President nearly ten years later.
    During your time as President you have amended and introduced new procedures and Practice Directions in public law to prevent the kind of slip ups you yourself made during your career. In the main, your well reasoned directives are excellent, the envy of the world, and quite rightly so. Taken as a whole, they are watertight. Your directions to curb the dodgy expert witnesses prevalent in family law, and your direct speeches to them, and your book (albeit overpriced) leave no doubt as to the standards and integrity you expect of them. Some of your more recent judgments in the Court of Appeal, and your public comments castigating the aberrant social workers you helped to breed, should make things safer for families. A voluminous set of late career works which possibly indicate a recognition of earlier shortcomings and a serious effort to repent by leaving something tangible as a momento of your presence. But when those of us who try to use your directions to obtain justice or correct injustice, we find that the work you have done in producing some of the finest guidance of any jurisdiction, is simply being ignored.
    Local authorities, and too many, far too many, of the judges in the lower courts, are either not bothering to stay up to date or are wiping their backsides with your guidance. For every one injustice you catch in the Court of Appeal (and when you do it, you do it well), hundreds at least are slipping through. It seems that whosoever occupies the Presidency, it’ll always be business as usual….specious language from lawyers, and Alice in Wonderland judges procrastinating in their hermitage of the family courts. More families are stripped of their assets by the legal profession in private law, and the Corporate Parent grows greedier day by day in the public law courts. Nobody cares about the President. Or about the kids. It’s all about the money. The President is just another banker.
    Jack Straw’s intervention, though understandable, was perhaps therefore frivolous; it may as well have been you as anybody else. It’s only a position on paper. And so far, you have only papered over the cracks, albeit with nice paper. Whilst you have publicly criticised everybody else, you have only uttered the need for a ‘cultural change’ in the judiciary, plus blaming the current crises on lack of money and judges. More judges will simply make more work for more judges in your ever expanding financial black hole….now so big the government is pulling the plug. If you could only have demonstrated value for money, or demonstrated that Family Division judges actually do their jobs diligently. When you do neither, be not surprised when the money stops.
    You leave the Family Division on the path to a better place, until the lawyers find a way around the coming changes, and the judges let it roll on with a nudge and a wink. The job of the President, as you have shown, is not to ensure justice, but to market the appearance of justice, deflect judicial accountability, and come down hard on anybody who may dare to open Pandora’s box. In your time you have blamed social workers, parents and politicians for the current fiasco; let’s hope the next President will be the first to deserve the grandiose label, and come down hard on his own.
  3. The Musa case – 7 children + 2 unjustly imprisoned parents = 1 need for a thorough IMPARTIAL UNBIASED investigation into a case riddled with irregularities.
    Phil Thompson said:
  4. Sir Nicholas Wall, Judge of the Family Division. I spoke to you at the INNER TEMPLE.You dismissed me without knowing of my case in that place.. I then sent you DETAILED PROOF of the MISCARRIAGE of JUSTICE in the case of my Family. You did not have the decency to reply. YOU KNEW that a WRONG had been done to me and my Family. In this day of your despair, REMEMBER ME. YOU could have caused a JUDICIAL ENQUIRY but chose SILENCE instead. A long time ago I watched a movie called “Witness for the Prosecution”. Perhaps you too could go on the road to Damascus and then speak for all those who have been ABUSED by the actions of Social Services and their accomplices certain lawyers, MONEY SEEKING LAWYERS. Sir Nicholas Wall. YOU KNEW but was LIMITED by the CODE of the JUDICIARY. I do not wish you ill. But I hope that in a future book you will explain of the LIMITS that were placed upon you in making a JUST decision. DID YOU BOW TO INSURANCE COMPANIES ?. Sir Nicholas Wall. Events even now are unfolding as to how the System of Social Services operates. The CORRUPTION must STOP. AGAIN I wish you well.
  5. As usual, an afterthought.. A replacement you ask ?. None other than Judge Mcfarlane. Please keep in mind that I wrote to him also refuting and PROVING the LIES that were uttered in Court by Walsall MBC in the case of my Family. NO REPLY from this Judge. So my question is this. Will anything change in the METHOD in which the Family Courts are arranged in Social Services favour?. I THINK NOT.
  6. Bruno D'Itri said:
    September 29, 2012 at 8:59 pm
    One of Nicholas Wall’s worst legacies is his still unexplained U-turn on the issue of Payne v Payne:
    http://news.realfathersforjustice.org/index.php?itemid=537
    Bruno D’Itri

ROBERT CALVERT MAXIMUM EFFECT - ODE TO THE SUN

Friday, 28 September 2012

SIR NICHOLAS WALL RETIRES!! + UPDATED COMMENTS

WALL RETIRES - THANK GOD!!

President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires

28 FridaySep 2012 from: http://researchingreform.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/president-of-the-family-division-sir-nicholas-wall-retires/

"Working within the confines of the courts and the limits of the law, Sir Nicholas was one of the more outspoken judges of his time and certainly pioneered radical discussion on increasing rights for unmarried couples, implementing no-fault divorce and more access to the family courts through media reporting to help increase transparency inside the system. He was also kind enough to take time out of his busy schedule to be a panel member for our Westminster Debate for KIDS.

We will be sorry to see him leave and wish him a quick recovery. However, the question which remains, is who will take Sir Nicholas’s place, as the new President of the Family Division?" =
AND WHO IS "WE" I WONT BE SORRY AT ALL - IN FACT ILL REJOICE - WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MUSA FAMILY IS A PUBLIC SCANDAL!!

7 thoughts on “President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires”
  1. forcedadoption said:
    September 28, 2012 at 5:27 pm
    I hope L.J.Wall makes a swift recovery but I am certainly NOT sad to see him go !He claimed that Christopher Booker had made errors in his column because judge Bellamy said so when in fact Bellamy took some facts off my forced adoption site two days before Christopher’s article was published (without mistakes !) ;He then blamed Christopher for my mistake and so did Wall ! Flattering that judges read my website however ! Even worse he stigmatised Vicky Haigh,relying he said on two judges.(both their judgements are now on line)In fact the first judge (Robertshaw) merely thought it probable that she coached her child to make allegationS about her father,the second judge relied entirely on the report of the first judge and Wall admitted relying on both of them ! Hardly fair to denigrate Vicky publicly on such flimsy evidence.He emphasised that Vicky did not appeal,when in fact her lawyers just did not take the necessary action ,.something a Wall knows well that happens quite regularly in the family courts; One thing he did get right however ….. Extract from the TIMES April13th 2010)
    “Lord Justice Wall (The Senior family court judge) said that the determination of some social workers to place children in an “unsatisfactory care system” away from their families was “quite shocking
  2. Nicholas Wall, I wish you a long and happy retirement. I am in two minds as to whether it should have been extended by your having retired earlier. I have needed to follow you particularly closely since you accepted the President position, despite the express wish to the contrary of the Lord Chancellor at that time.
    It is my opinion that you inherited a hopeless position and that scenario was produced in part by yourself. Perhaps it is rough justice then that you were given the task of cleaning up the family division. In the Pythonesque irony so typical of the family division, there really was nobody better qualified to identify and deal with the rot. A bit like tying a bomber to his home made, tamper-proof bomb and instructing him to defuse it. Couldn’t have been very healthy for you.
    Sadly, you will always be remembered for the PC&S case. Perhaps now you are out of office you could finally apologise, not just to the family, but to the nation tainted. In this case, you were easily led; so much so, that you actually joined in with the unwarranted fabrication of a case where there was none against the mother. You denied her representation; you denied her any communication for assistance with anybody outside of the court. You subjected her to these conditions for several days in court. Then you took her baby. You showed the social services and their local authority lawyers how easily led busy judges can be, simply by using Orwellian narrative techniques. You opened the floodgates for child-snatchers before Baby P, and now there is no closing them. But that was before you became President.
    In private law, you blew it in 2003. ‘Making Contact Work.’ As ever, a conflict of interest bunch of the wrong people blabbing about the pros and cons of shared parenting. The predictable result was that somehow no move forwards in that area of law that over-feeds the socio-legal professions would happen. But we watched nonetheless to see how you would manage to do it. You ended with a phrase that went something like this: “Yes we can see how (a legal presumption of) shared parenting would help, but we cannot see how it would function in efficacy.” Like Clive Baldwin wrote of you, after PC&S, ‘who needs fact when you have narrative?’ The American Bar Association is more honest; they state they do not like shared parenting as a presumption in law because half their income would disappear. The British public are tired of being insulted by successive Presidents’ use of transparent, specious and shallow justifications for evading their obligations in private law. Your retort to the criticisms of family law professionals’ profiteering that “there are many altruistic people in family law” did not make it clear whether you included yourself. Hundreds of thousands of damaged and separated families, and especially, separated children and fathers, would counter such a self-inclusion. You should have been monitoring the courts and booting out those who are not altruists, rather than providing shelter for them. Titling something as ‘Making Contact Work’ whilst deliberately going in the opposite direction, with all those involved soaking up public money is the root of Broken Britain.
    Rejecting the Early interventions Pilot Project recently when all around you had signed it off (despite stating yourself in 2003 that such a pilot project was a necessity) and failing to define ‘meaningful contact’ at any stage in your career, merely reinforces any opinion of your contemptuous indifference to the suffering of most of the children whose futures were to be decided in your courts. Contact didn’t work in 2003, and does not work upon your stepping down as President nearly ten years later.
    During your time as President you have amended and introduced new procedures and Practice Directions in public law to prevent the kind of slip ups you yourself made during your career. In the main, your well reasoned directives are excellent, the envy of the world, and quite rightly so. Taken as a whole, they are watertight. Your directions to curb the dodgy expert witnesses prevalent in family law, and your direct speeches to them, and your book (albeit overpriced) leave no doubt as to the standards and integrity you expect of them. Some of your more recent judgments in the Court of Appeal, and your public comments castigating the aberrant social workers you helped to breed, should make things safer for families. A voluminous set of late career works which possibly indicate a recognition of earlier shortcomings and a serious effort to repent by leaving something tangible as a momento of your presence. But when those of us who try to use your directions to obtain justice or correct injustice, we find that the work you have done in producing some of the finest guidance of any jurisdiction, is simply being ignored.
    Local authorities, and too many, far too many, of the judges in the lower courts, are either not bothering to stay up to date or are wiping their backsides with your guidance. For every one injustice you catch in the Court of Appeal (and when you do it, you do it well), hundreds at least are slipping through. It seems that whosoever occupies the Presidency, it’ll always be business as usual….specious language from lawyers, and Alice in Wonderland judges procrastinating in their hermitage of the family courts. More families are stripped of their assets by the legal profession in private law, and the Corporate Parent grows greedier day by day in the public law courts. Nobody cares about the President. Or about the kids. It’s all about the money. The President is just another banker.
    Jack Straw’s intervention, though understandable, was perhaps therefore frivolous; it may as well have been you as anybody else. It’s only a position on paper. And so far, you have only papered over the cracks, albeit with nice paper. Whilst you have publicly criticised everybody else, you have only uttered the need for a ‘cultural change’ in the judiciary, plus blaming the current crises on lack of money and judges. More judges will simply make more work for more judges in your ever expanding financial black hole….now so big the government is pulling the plug. If you could only have demonstrated value for money, or demonstrated that Family Division judges actually do their jobs diligently. When you do neither, be not surprised when the money stops.
    You leave the Family Division on the path to a better place, until the lawyers find a way around the coming changes, and the judges let it roll on with a nudge and a wink. The job of the President, as you have shown, is not to ensure justice, but to market the appearance of justice, deflect judicial accountability, and come down hard on anybody who may dare to open Pandora’s box. In your time you have blamed social workers, parents and politicians for the current fiasco; let’s hope the next President will be the first to deserve the grandiose label, and come down hard on his own.
  3. The Musa case – 7 children + 2 unjustly imprisoned parents = 1 need for a thorough IMPARTIAL UNBIASED investigation into a case riddled with irregularities.
    Phil Thompson said:
  4. Sir Nicholas Wall, Judge of the Family Division. I spoke to you at the INNER TEMPLE.You dismissed me without knowing of my case in that place.. I then sent you DETAILED PROOF of the MISCARRIAGE of JUSTICE in the case of my Family. You did not have the decency to reply. YOU KNEW that a WRONG had been done to me and my Family. In this day of your despair, REMEMBER ME. YOU could have caused a JUDICIAL ENQUIRY but chose SILENCE instead. A long time ago I watched a movie called “Witness for the Prosecution”. Perhaps you too could go on the road to Damascus and then speak for all those who have been ABUSED by the actions of Social Services and their accomplices certain lawyers, MONEY SEEKING LAWYERS. Sir Nicholas Wall. YOU KNEW but was LIMITED by the CODE of the JUDICIARY. I do not wish you ill. But I hope that in a future book you will explain of the LIMITS that were placed upon you in making a JUST decision. DID YOU BOW TO INSURANCE COMPANIES ?. Sir Nicholas Wall. Events even now are unfolding as to how the System of Social Services operates. The CORRUPTION must STOP. AGAIN I wish you well.
  5. As usual, an afterthought.. A replacement you ask ?. None other than Judge Mcfarlane. Please keep in mind that I wrote to him also refuting and PROVING the LIES that were uttered in Court by Walsall MBC in the case of my Family. NO REPLY from this Judge. So my question is this. Will anything change in the METHOD in which the Family Courts are arranged in Social Services favour?. I THINK NOT.
  6. Bruno D'Itri said:
    September 29, 2012 at 8:59 pm
    One of Nicholas Wall’s worst legacies is his still unexplained U-turn on the issue of Payne v Payne:
    http://news.realfathersforjustice.org/index.php?itemid=537
    Bruno D’Itri
    D Cutts said:
    September 30, 2012 at 8:34 pm
    There is a groundswell now with the parents of snatched children starting to group together and spread the word of the mass corruption in the family courts. The police are now being outed as corrupt too, especially South Yorkshire, by allowing at least 50 young girls to be abused by a paedophile ring that included a police officer. The worst paedophile rings are state run, as witnessed by a mother of a snatched child who was put in prison for merely talking to her own daughter. Vicky Haigh put her case right in the public domain by fighting the system and engineering that the Gestapo civil servants made serious mistakes by trying to gag her. Hurrah to John Hemming lifting the gag so at least one parent can speak out which I am sure she will do very soon. At least the council of Doncaster could be named too. Is it any coincidence that Doncaster is in South Yorkshire working alongside the corrupt police force. The amount of collusion between these two “companies” surely warrants a public inquiry? The truth will out and at last the nation can see for themselves how social services traffic the children of the UK through their own fixed court hearings, where their only motivation is a care order or adoption, to line their pockets, and of course to procure the children for the protected paedophiles. They care not that the poor child gets put with their abuser as they foam at the mouth with greed. The solicitors and barristers that are state funded are too “in on the act” and advise the parent, as in the case of Vicky Haigh to meet the result that the county councils want, by conning and tricking the trusting parent, to land their care order. This is serious collusion to entrap and defraud the innocent parents. “By the right means if you can, but by any means MAKE MONEY”, has to be the county councils company policy! There is no logic and these civil servants are de- sensitised as to what is moral and right. The British Tax Payer has a right to know where their money is going. The RSPCA protect the nations animals better than our children are being protected by the state. Social services are used to procure vulnerable children into a sick state system that use and abuse them, then they just pass them over to the criminal justice system when they are too old to profit from. Vicky Haigh saw the debris caused in prison as most of the poor women in there were victims of abuse. I am very uncomfortable with the fact that some CAFCASS Directors are on the boards of child protection charities and indeed adoption companies. A Quango “Law unto themselves”. Why is Child Sex Abuse so closely linked with Secret Family Courts? They have the whole gory system set up don’t they. Police don’t charge the paedos, social services take the children, secret family courts, gag the parents or put them in prison, and CAFCASS provide a job for the boys! WAKE UP everyone, get your local MP’s behind Hemming and let’s start by making the much needed changes. Have a happy retirement Lord Wall, let’s hope the next president does not allow himself to be hoodwinked by the corruption of the whole rotten system and exposes the sheer madness by calling for open courts, public inquiries and to assist in abolishing the most draconian law, that of forced adoption. Let’s hope he DOES have a heart and DOES care about our next generation, otherwise we will soon all be brought up by strangers!
    Reply
    • Sir Nicholas Wall, in your retirement I trust that your conscience will continually gnaw at what you could have done to help FAMILIES who were abused by Social Services. YOU KNEW of so many miscarriages of Justice but brazened your way till now. I would like to write more but my skin is very thin unlike yours.
      Reply
    -------------------------------------------------
    From the "Sunday Telegraph" by Christopher Booker:
    30 10 2011 - Christopher Booker
    Lord Justice Wall takes on an alarming child-snatching case
    This seems to be a classic instance of the way social workers make a crashing initial mistake, then add ever more questionable allegations to defend their blunder. A mother and her daughter have been fighting a care order.
    In the child-snatching story that I have reported on here most often, the latest twists are as disturbing as anything that has gone before. The case has been taken over by Lord Justice Wall, the President of the Family Division. It is a classic instance of how, when social workers seize children on the basis of what appears to be a crashing initial mistake, they then seem to make ever more questionable allegations against the parents to defend their original blunder.
    On June 27, a year-old baby that had been torn from its mother’s arms at birth (but was later returned to the couple on a judge’s orders) developed a fever. When the parents took the baby to hospital for medical advice, the staff contacted social workers, who called in the police on an allegation that the parents had drugged the baby with opium. The parents were arrested and held in a police cell for 27 hours. The baby was taken back into care.
    This month, I am told, the police announced that no charges would be brought against the couple, lab tests having shown no trace of any drugs. The social workers had apparently known this for weeks. Meanwhile, they asked the police to arrest the couple on a charge of conspiracy to abduct their other five children from foster homes and take them abroad. The parents had no idea where their children were, having not seen them for many months. Again, it seems, no charges are to be brought, because there was no evidence.
    Despite an order by Lord Justice Wall that the parents must again be given regular contact with their children, his order has, I gather, been ignored. There is much in this alarming case for the learned judge to investigate.
    For legal reasons, comments have been disabled on this story. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8857570/Lord-JusStatement of Gloria Musa for the High Court;21/7/2011
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Statement of Gloria Musa for the High Court;21/7/2011
    1:-My name is Gloria Musa.My husband Chiwar and I have six {update: as of March 10 2012 there are 7 children upon the birth of X7 in Holloway prison - ed} children who have never been ill or in hospital before the intervention of Haringey social services, X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, + X7.
    I am of Nigerian nationality and a respected evangelist preacher and bishop,author of many books and my sermons can be found on DVDs on line including one preached to a large congregation at the Hilton Metropole hotel in London.I was a virgin when I married and in accordance with my strict Christian beliefs I have never had sexual relations with any man other than my husband.We are visitors in this country and our dearest wish is to return to Nigeria with our 6 children to live a normal family life in an African culture.We would all leave immediately if permitted.
    2:-The reason given at the time for taking away my children in April 2010 was a letter found in the garden allegedly written by X1 (then aged 9) saying that I was a cruel mother who beat her without mercy.This letter was written in an adult hand that bore absolutely no resemblance to X1's writing in her school exercise book but Judge Brasse refused to look at my evidence so that the handwriting could be compared ,refused to look at the graphologist report confirming that X1 was not the author of the letter,saying that it did not matter as "we have gone beyond that".With respect the judge erred as if Favour did not write the letter then the person who did forge her signature also perverted the course of justice and the matter should have been investigated.
    3:-It was a terrible shock in April 2010 that my 5 younger children were taken away with no prior warning by police and social workers whilst I was still pregnant with my youngest X6.
    Originally when the children were taken Haringey local authority applied for an interim care order, Judge Brasse heard the barrister for the local authority state as a fact that I was a sex worker (I was not allowed to speak in order to either question the barrister or deny the allegations). ,that I had been abused in childhood and taken drugs , that the children were multiparented and had been traffiked into the country and would entail jail sentences for those responsible.Judge Brasse in answer to my denials of all this promised rather sceptically that if I produced my medical records and dna results to prove my denials true that was all I needed to do.I assumed that he mean't that I would then have my children returned.
    4:-DNA proved all six were mine and my husband's,my medical records showed a normal happy drugfree and uneventful childhood ,and the care assistant who wrongly and illegally described herself as a social worker admitted she had no evidence of sex working other than that "she ticked all the boxes as she never claimed benefits"She made several enquiries from parents at my children's school asking if they knew I was a sex worker causing uproar,dismay,and a lot of bad publicity.The lack of evidence was recorded on a court document that was sent to me by Haringey inadvertently !.Judge Brasse then studied reports made by social workers and other documents handed in by them which I was not allowed to see ! Surely denying me a fair hearing contrary to my human rights.Judge Brasse at a later hearing did not keep his promise ,and it was only just before the fact finding hearings in February 2011 that allegations of child beatings on all five elder children were made against me purely on hearsay to justify the further care orders being put in place;I was refused permission by judge Brasse to question Joyce the allotted social worker at that time and refused permission to play a recording that would have proved conclusively that she had lied under oath.Surely contrary to my human right right to a fair hearing.?
    5:-When my 6th child , X6 was born,8 police came into the hospital with two social workers after 3am ,4 hours after the baby was born and seized my baby by force waking up other mothers in the ward . I was badly bruised when this took place perhaps because I shouted that I would resist until they showed me a court order which they did not.With such an uproar the affair was put very much in the public domain by those who witnessed it.Judge Brasse refused to consider the unecessary taking of my child at the instance of Haringey but blamed me for the bad publicity! Surely he should have considered this evidence when judging my behaviour against that of Haringey?
    6:- Some months later my baby who was continually ill in care was returned to me where she thrived,proving surely that if I was no danger to a helpless baby then I was was surely no danger to my older children who judge Brasse had ordered to be fostered in London .They were in fact fostered in Dartford via Capstone Fostering agency.Judge Brasse refused to enforce his own order leaving me to carry my baby plus food for the children to contact vie bus from my flat to seven sisters tube,then on to London bridge station ,from there to Dartford,and then Taxi to the contact centre.All this was 3 or 4 times a week at my own expense as the only time Haringey gave us two tickets we did not notice they were singles so my husband and I were both fined £50 on the return journey !Judge Brasse refused to believe Haringey had not provided financial help, calling me a liar and refused to allow social workers to be questioned on that point.
    .7:- Despite the fact that the independent social worker and the psychiatrist both reported to me that X1 aged 10 wanted to see her mother,I have been denied contact face to face and by telephone,I have not seen or heard from my daughter for nearly a year; Social workers informed me that they had changed her name to "Y",. When the children's grandparents came from Africa to see her and her aunt came from the USA both were denied access.Even X1's siblings told me they had not seen her at all this year.
    Judge Brasse ignored the fact that in August 2010 X1 had alleged sexual abuse by the son of her foster family and asked as a present for her birthday a diary with a lock on it so that she could record her secret thoughts; Judge Brasse decided instead to deprive her of all contact with her parents ;He refused me permission to telephone to say happy birthday and later happy Xmas nothing more than two words and supervised to boot..This neglect to enquire into a possible crime but instead to sequester the complaining child from that day forward was surely illegal or at least contrary to goog legal practice?
    Her workbook produced by the independent social worker late last year revealed her answer to the exercise titled"your thoughts" when she chose to ring "fed up","pressured" and "angry"
    8:- I and Chiwar share parental responsibility for all our children and therefore have the right to see medical records and school reports for all of them but these have been consistently refused both by social workers and by judge Brasse since the children were taken in April 2010.Surely the judge erred in this?
    9-The ABE police video made when the children were taken shows all 5 older children denying that they were ever beaten or struck with implements by their parents.This video has been illegally witheld from evidence with judge Brasse's consent, and apart from a letter "found" in a garden purporting to have been written by X1 in a handwriting in no way resembling her own ,no written or verbal evidence from the children themselves alleging beatings or showing any marks has ever been presented.The children themselves could have cleared up the matter by coming to court as all clamoured to come home at contact and all 4 still allowed to see me said they had been told to say they had been beaten otherwise contact would be stopped ,which it now has been ! Their right to make their views known and to testify if competent was denied them contrary to the UN Declaration of Children's Rights and also to a recent Supreme court decision W(children) 2010.
    Instead social workers said the children admitted to being beaten and their hearsay evidence was preferred by judge Brasse to the live evidence on the police video of the children's own words ! To find as fact that the children were ill treated on hearsay evidence when photographs of happy well dressed children with their parents and the childrens own denials were disregarded surely shows that the judge erred,
    .10:-Recently a health visitor gave the baby "X6" a normal injection against childish ailments that resulted in giving the baby a high temperature (not unusual) When to be on the safe side I took her to hospital I was accused of feeding her opium and police prevented me from approaching the baby even after discharge from hospital when it was shown that no traces of drugs of any kind were found in the blood of the baby or us her parents.Despite this the child has not been returned but has been witheld illegally since no theshold has been crossed given the mistaken belief in opium poisining and the inadvertent abuse of the baby by the hospital who at the insistence of social workers that the baby was suffering from opium poisoning gave her large doses of an antidote which made the child very ill indeed before she was finally discharged and fostered.
    11:-I am representing myself with (I hope!) the assistance of a Mckenzie friend because every solicitor that has acted for me or been consulted by me has insisted that the only way to regain my children would be for me to accept all the allegations of Haringey that I am a prostitute,a drug user,and a child beater but apart from the absurd slur on my character this would be perjury and having sworn to tell the truth I shall continue to do exactly that in all circumstances
    12:-The most worrying aspect of this affair is the immediate sequestration of X6 following her complaint of sexual abuse by 19 year old R (son of the fosterers) .My other children reported that she had been seen by police and also by a psychiatrist,but even X3 with whom she shared a foster family stated that she had not seen X1 since Xmas and neither had the other children;
    Contact with all five elder children was stopped with no reason two months ago and I have had no contact with X6 ,my baby since she was taken for the second time.
    Judge Brasse refused to consider any of this and forced me under duress of "consequences" to sign an agreement not to approach X1's foster family or school. Surely he erred in doing this without any kind of investigation as to X1's circumstances given her"disappearance" following her protest of sexual abuse Surely his refusal to allow even a supervised telephone call to say "happy Xmas"and refusal to allow access to granparents,aunt,and even the high commissioner for Sierra Leone (a friend) was contrary to the children's act 1989 giving priority to uniting families not destroying them?
    There have been allegations that I wildly accuse all those involved of "grand design" and Conspiracies" when in fact it is very obvious that Haringey and his honour judge Brasse have made several very serious errors and are anxious to cover them up to justify their actions rather than admit them or to put matters right.A very human and very common failing.
    I hope my Lord that you will put matters right and at the very least order some form of supervised contact with X1 as
    I DO NOT KNOW IF SHE IS ALIVE OR DEAD.
    Signed........................ Date........................
    ==========================================

MAURICE KIRKS SITE

DELETED COMMENTS RESTORED FROM M KIRKS SITE – UPDATE 23 SEPT. 12


Posted on September 14, 2012 by butlincat

Whilst Maurice was in prison others were using his site to run some kind of smear campaign against a supporter of M Kirks via the comments section to a post

 MAUR KIRK SITE COMMENTS 23 SEPT 12


 
which of course is not what Maurice intended his site for and when I tried to point out a few things my comments were deleted and I am blocked as a result – the screenshot of what I get when I try and access the site here:







There is something going on with certain of these commenters as can be clearly seen by their accusations of criminal activity towards another supporter.



IAN JOSEPHS OF THE "FORCED ADOPTION" SITE WRITES:

Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:16 AM
Subject: greeting from ian;

Hello ! Ian Josephs calling !

Birds of a feather flock together ! Social Workers, Experts,Guardians, Solicitors,Barristers,and Judges ALL in different ways make a very comfortable living arranging the theft of children from parents most of whom have never harmed them.These disgusting criminals work together arranging the snatching of babies at birth for" risk of emotional abuse" .They should be locked up for a very long time ! I called my website FORCED ADOPTION because adoption by force is a wicked crime that merits punishment for the outwardly respectable criminals who make a living out of it it !
How can they get away with it ? They do it by suppressing free speech and jailing those who expose them by name !
Shame on us for letting them continue destroying families! If everyone at this meeting tells at least a dozen people who in turn tell another dozen people what goes on then soon enough everybody will know .Please spread the word and call for free speech and the end of forced adoption..... YOU CAN DO IT !

IAN
 

IAN

RALLY THIS SATURDAY AT TRAFALGAR SQUARE, LONDON


UK END CHILD ABUSE MARCH AND RALLY - THIS SATURDAY 29 SEPT.

Thursday, 27 September 2012

THE RENDLESHAM UFO - JIM PENNISTON

Penniston posted in Justice for the Bentwaters 81st Security Police at Rendlesham Forest 1980 Jim Penniston 8:59pm Sep 26 We are pleased to be able to make a major announcement today. We have received and decided to accept an offer from a major US publishing house in respect of our book. The book will be published by St. Martin's Press and the provisional title is "Rendezvous at Rendlesham". St. Martin's Press is one of the largest publishers in the United States and we are pleased to be working with a company that has a proven track record of publishing books from some of the world's best-known authors. It is our belief that the Rendlesham Forest incident is a bigger and more significant UFO case than Roswell. It is our intention, in this book, to place into the public domain everything that we know about the extraordinary series of events that took place at Bentwaters and Woodbridge, both during the encounters themselves, and in the aftermath. While there have been previous books on the subject, they have been written by people in the UFO community. Now, the military personnel at the heart of this incident will finally have their say. This case has been devilled by misinformation, disinformation and by people wanting to write themselves into the story. We intend to set the record straight and tell the full story of these extraordinary events for the first time. We do so in order to reveal the truth about events that we believe are of immense historical significance and public interest. We also do so for the men and women stationed at Bentwaters and Woodbridge at the time, many of whom have suffered as a result of what happened. It is our hope that the publication of this book will lead to the wrongs they have suffered being righted. In writing this book we have decided to work with former UK Ministry of Defense employee Nick Pope. There are several reasons for this. Nick is an experienced author, journalist and broadcaster with a high mainstream media profile both in the UK and in the US, where he now lives. More importantly, his 21-year government career means that he understands the culture and ethos of the military personnel at the heart of this story in a way that ufologists do not. The fact that one of his postings was to MoD's UFO project, where he undertook a cold case review of the Rendlesham Forest incident, means that he is intimately familiar with the intricacies of this case. Finally, the fact that he held - as did we - a TS/SCI security clearance, means that he understands the sensitivities involved. We are also working with a lawyer, Pat Frascogna, who is advising us on a wide range of legal issues associated with the case. As an attorney, Pat is also making a series of carefully targeted Freedom of Information Act requests for documents relating to our military service and to the Rendlesham Forest incident more generally. This will supplement the significant number of government and military documents that we have already amassed. We appreciate that people will have many comments and questions, but for the time being, we have little further to say. Clearly our priority now must be to concentrate on the book itself. We will make further announcements when we have something relevant to say (e.g. notification of the publication date), but neither we nor Nick will enter into discussions with people over this before publication, except in the case of those with direct involvement in these events, who we will be speaking to as part of the process of putting together the book. Generally speaking, we will not be engaging with the UFO community on this. Our book is not about ufologists, but about the men and women who served at the twin bases of Bentwaters and Woodbridge and were caught up in these extraordinary events. We hope you are as excited about this major new development as we are and we look forward to sharing with you the definitive insiders' account of the Rendlesham Forest incident. John Burroughs and Jim Penniston, September 26, 2012

 

---- PART 2: ==

  http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/108013/RENDLESHAM__BENTWATERS_UFO__2__2/

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS - JOHN L WALSON

Published on 26 Sep 2012 by JohnLenardWalson if it was wrong to do this why did the bbc 4 do a tv documentary about the spy sats that philip masding got on film??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTUiSNsmkCw&feature=related

philip masding and mike film of the Lacrosse Satellites, very nice. BBC 4 special called The Satellite Story amateur astronomy video satellite tracking Astronomy Festival BBC Sky Night skyatnight Patrick Moore philip masding and mike film the Lacrosse Satellites, very nice. This is a clip from a BBC 4 special called The Satellite Story.

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTUiSNsmkCw&feature=related

This clip hilights the efforts by amateur astronomers to track satellites. There is a great sequence of their efforts to track the International Space Station. also thanks to the bbc for Astronomy BBC Sky Night skyatnight Patrick Moore a great tv show



------------------------



This is a clip from a BBC 4 special called The Satellite Story. This clip hilights the efforts by amateur astronomers to track satellites. There is a great sequence of their efforts to track the International Space Station.

TOTTENHAM RIOTS - DUGGAN HAD GUN - POLICE OFFICERS CLAIMS

BBC NEWS 20.00GMT 26 9 12

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

NEW HAWKWIND ALBUMS

Hiya guys

delighted to announce we will be releasing a new album with the Hawkwind Light Orchestra entitled Stellar Variations and also a new Dave Brock solo album, entitled Looking for Love in the Lost Land of Dreams-- again this Novembe...
r.

Both titles as they are new albums will be on the Esoteric Antenna label. Details below. Both Mark and myself really liked these fine albums --hope you do too and please help spread the word with your facebooks etc!! and please feel free to join our facebook too.

Further details will be on the brand new Esoteric Website in the next week or so and preorders will start in early October. www.esotericrecordings.com .

Oh and of course we have the Palace Springs double disc reissue in late October before then. Many thanks as always to Brian Tawn for his splendid notes for them.


Esoteric Recordings’ front-line label, ESOTERIC ANTENNA, is pleased to announce the release of the new studio album by DAVE BROCK, founder and leader of the legendary HAWKWIND.

“Looking for Love in the Lost Land of Dreams” is arguably the finest solo collection ever recorded by Dave Brock. Created over a five-year period, Dave explains; “It’s an album that was created using different recording techniques. It’s a collection of recordings that capture those magic moments that one tries to achieve in the studio”.

Featuring appearances by Hawkwind drummer Richard Chadwick and the late Jason Stuart, the album is a fine gathering of material that encompasses Space Rock, Ambient and Psychedelic styles that are the hallmark of Brock’s solo work and his work with Hawkwind.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Esoteric Recordings’ front-line label, ESOTERIC ANTENNA, is pleased to announce the release of the debut studio album by HAWKWIND LIGHT ORCHESTRA. The album “Stellar Variations” showcases Hawkwind founding member Dave Brock, long serving stalwart Richard Chadwick and sharp, bright blade Niall Hone’s collection of music forged as a by-product of the tyranny of distance. The material features typical Hawkwind themes of otherworldly splendour and strange, glistening, aural landscapes. There are futuristic prophecies, animalistic war chants, stellar peace hymns and an ongoing self-referential opera. “Stellar Variations” is the sound of three musicnauts firing on all cylinders and is an essential album in the Hawkwind canon.
See More
Like · ·

BARRY CHAMISH WRITES:

Barry Chamish writes:

from: Barry chamish@netvision.net.il
to: Barry Chamish
date: 25 September 2012 02:15
subject: atone
mailed-by: netvision.net.il
" www.barrychamish.com
THIS YOM KIPPUR: GOD MUST ATONE FOR THE JEWS
by Barry Chamish

Coming up on Yom Kipper, our day of atonement, I get people calling me, telling me that a Stephen someone, who claims he was in the CIA, was on a popular radio show with exclusive information; Israel was going to bomb Iran on Yom Kipper. All I could say was, don't believe one word from this phoney. Israel's soldiers couldn't be persuaded to work on Yom Kippur, let alone mount an attack. And on the best of days, the fear of the retaliation on Israel's people has ameliorated most of the war cries. Instead, we have surreptitious operations and if that doesn't work, there's the old standby; Mutual Assured Destruction. We have to hope that Iran's repulsion of evisceration, is equal to ours.
This year, as always, I will fast and go to shul. I cancelled my radio show, a la Sandy Koufax and Shawn Green, and bought pre-fast delights. I'm all ready except for one change; this year I will not atone for anything. What do I have to atone for? I told the truth as I knew it. I stood up for my family and people slaughtered in the Holocaust. I tried to force OUR criminals to trial with gruesome evidence. As a result, I was driven from my home and my children by genuine threats that they may lose their father if I stick around any longer.
And getting my truth out is a painful business. The toughest sell I have is that our religion has been infiltrated by the Sabbatains. Without an understanding of this rot, all political analyses are worthless. All prophecies, Hebrew or Christian, are moot. And our "experts", save an ignored few, speak from ignorance.
I am one of four commentators on a three hour DVD called, Clear and Present Evil, professionally produced by Steve Stavro. Its theme is the Vatican is behind most, if not all, of the world's woes. I have sent the DVD to trusted readers and response has been enthusiastic. One almost jubilant viewer wrote, "It's amazing. It has filled all the gaps for me." In truth, it hasn't. It filled one big gap for you, but may Steve's next DVD be about the Sabbataians, or the gap is yawning.
One of the DVD's commentators, a world expert on the illuminati, or a Catholic political cult, Bill Hughs, was on my radio show last week. He pointed out the Jesuit communes used to imprison Natives in South America and I noted, "Like the kibbutzim." He didn't know what a kibbutz was. Without the Sabbataian knowledge, all his arguments were flawed.
I am about to remind you what that hidden history is. I hope the Jews will finally acknowledge that it's time to stop blaming ourselves. Are we atoning for being so dumb we can't read our own history, no matter how many lives were lost? I answer, if there is a God of the Jews, and you have an answer, I demand to hear it already. You wanna know what I think? My gut feeling is You don't have a plan.

**

Before we carry on to the Sabbatains, I have a beef. I sent out 62 of my remarkably funny ms.1971. MOST readers sent highly flattering comments. But a handful have ordered and not paid, leaving me to foot the bill for the printing, binding, and postage for a 178 page manuscript. The first excuses for the Clear and Deadly Evil DVD have come in. "You didn't confirm our order." Or another, "Something came up. I can't afford it now." Then on my paid list, some of those who signed on haven't paid a penny. If you want to atone this Yom Kippur, pay me. I work hard for you. For those who have supported me, there is a surprise DVD awaiting or coming to you in your mailbox. See, supporting me has its rewards.
My Sabbatain lecture, also at Gonob Radio, scroll down to me, is at:
http://www.soundwaves2000.com/radio_liberty/

Here is the history we all should know: Without it, our prayers are meaningless:
***

THE DEUTSCH DEVILS by Barry Chamish

Rabbi Marvin Antelman was right all along. Way back in 1974, he identified the source of all the evil against Jews and humanity but his message and style were too unaccessible to get through to anyone but the most advanced students of anti-semitism. What he lacked most was simplicity, a common enough failure of thinkers decades in advance of their contemporaries. What he needed was someone to put out a Cliff's Notes simplified explanation of his thesis...and someone, without intention, just did.
The name of the book is, 50 Jewish Messiahs by Jerry Rabow (Gefen Publishing, Jerusalem). It is an informative but shallow overview of just what the title says, but in its shallowness lies vital depth. We begin with Chapter 17, about the "most damaging messiah to the Jewish people," Shabbatai Zvi. First we'll read Rabow and then add commentary opening Rabbi Antelman's work to the wide world.

pp 91 - Shabbatai Zvi was born in Smyrna, Turkey on the ninth of Av, 1626. The ninth day of Av is the day of a triple tragedy for the Jewish nation. According to tradition, the First Temple, the Second Temple and Bar Kokhba's Betar fortress all fell on this day.

pp 93 - He changed the holiday celebrations and violated the dietary prohibitions. All of this followed from his declaration that the usual rules were inapplicable to messianic times.

pp 95 - He declared that the coming of the messianic era meant that the biblical commandments were no longer binding. He proclaimed that God now permitted everything.

** This is Rabbi Antelman's central assertion; that Shabbataism was the polar opposite of Judaism. That Shabbatai Zvi's program was to destroy all the tenets of the Torah and replace them with their opposites. Incredibly, more than half the Jews of the world at the time, believed he would be revealed as their promised messiah: **

pp 101 - Then he finally made the announcement for which the Jewish community had been waiting for 1600 years - he would begin the Redemption on the 15th day of the month of Sivan, June 18, 1666.

** There are many who will recognize the significance of the date. June is the sixth month, 18 divided by three is 6+6+6 and 1666 is clear enough. Either he knew what he was doing or the prophesies of the emergence of an evil false messiah or anti-Christ are right, and Shabbatai Zvi was him. **

pp 110 - Through all of this, Shabbatai continued to issue proclamations of the theological changes wrought by the coming of the messianic age. Shabbatai's new prayer was, "Praised be He who permits the forbidden." Since all things would be permitted in the age of the messiah, Shabbatai declared many of the old restrictions of the Torah no longer applicable. He abolished the laws concerning sexual relationships. He eventually declared that all of the thirty six major biblical sins were now permitted and instructed some of his followers that it was their duty to perform such sins in order to hasten the Redemption.

** Shabbatai's fall from grace among the great masses of Jews came in September 1666, when the Sultan of Turkey threatened him with torture unless he converted to Islam. He relented and most of Jewry abandoned him. But not all. A core of his followers kept their messiah alive and kicking hard. **

pp 112 - In order to bring on the Reformation, Shabbatai had descended into the darkness of the Muslim world to gather the scattered fragments of the light of creation hidden there. There was an outward reality and an inner reality. Nathan transformed Shabbatainism into a theology of paradox. Once the followers accepted the concept of paradox, they would be able to keep on believing in Shabbatai Zvi...An inner circle of his followers accepted the explanations of Nathan and continued to believe in Shabbatai the Messiah.

** The Shabbatai followers continued their hidden life in the Turkish sect of the Donmeh, whose activities continue to this day, as reported extensively this year, even by the staid Jerusalem Post. One of the Donmeh followers was Jacob Frank, who would transform Europe and the world into a Shabbataian hell barely a century later. **

pp 121 - The Donmeh now converted the Shabbataian Purim into an annual orgy, when members exchanged spouses for a ceremony called "extinguishing the lights." The Donmeh justified their Purim orgies, and their regular practise of sharing wives and engaging in other sexual activities, by citing biblical precedents.

pp 123 - Although Jacob Frank (1726-1791) was born fifty years after the death Shabbatai Zvi, he deserves to be regarded as Shabbatai's true successor.

pp 125 - Frank's followers requested ecclesiastic protection on the grounds that their own beliefs were not Jewish but rather, "anti-Talmudist."..The bishop declared that the "anti-Talmudists", Frank's followers, were entitled to practise their religion, and ordered that all copies of the Talmud within his diocese be seized and burned. Now under the protection of the crown, adoring followers gave Frank huge donations to his movement.

pp 127 - He extended the paradoxical teachings of Shabbatai Zvi that the coming of the messianic age had transformed sexual prohibitions of the bible into permissions and even obligations. According to Frank, engaging in sexual orgies now became the means to purify the soul from its sins. Debauchery became therapy...Frank convinced his followers that the only way for their special form of Judaism to survive was for them to outwardly become Christians, just as the Donmeh had descended into the world of Islam...In February, 1759, the Frankists told the Church they were ready to be baptized...The Frankists promised to deliver 5000 new Christians from Poland, Moravia, Hungary and Turkey.

pp 130 - The Frankists also became involved in international political intrigue, and sent secret emissaries to the Russian government and the Eastern Orthodox Church offering to help in the overthrow of Poland and the Catholic Church...By 1786, Frank suffered temporary financial problems, and moved his court to Offenbach, near Frankfurt. There Frank's money problems were somehow solved. The source of Frank's immense wealth is not clear. He may have used his movement's system of secret messengers and clandestine cells to engage in the constant political turmoil involving Austria-Hungary, Turkey and the Balkans.

** And now we reach the final depth of Rabow's understanding and let Rabbi Antelman take over. **

Frankfurt at the time was the headquarters of the Jesuit, Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, as well as Rothschild Brothers' financial empire. This is worth repeating: Frankfurt was the birthplace of both the Illuminati and the Rothschild empire. When Jacob Frank entered the city, the alliance between the two had already begun. Weishaupt provided the conspiratorial resources of the Jesuit Order, while the Rothschilds contributed the money. What was missing was a means to spread the agenda of the Illuminati and that the Frankists added with their network of agents throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds.
Jacob Frank became instantly wealthy because he was given a nice handout by the Rothschilds of Frankfurt. There is no other explanation.
And from this starting point, Rabbi Antelman gave us a blueprint for the war against Judaism and all its good, and indeed against humanity and all its moral treasures. A movement of complete evil now took hold. The Jesuits' goal was the destruction of the Protestant Reformation leading to a return of one pope sitting in judgement on all mankind. The Rothschilds goal was to control the wealth of the planet. And the Frankist vision was the destruction of Jewish ethics to be replaced by a religion based on the exact opposite of God's intentions. When these factions blended, a bloody war against humanity, with the Jews on the front lines, erupted and it is reaching its very pinnacle at this moment.
Rabbi Antelman traces the means of the worldwide reach of this ugliness. By the 1770s, the Illuminati was exposed and banned in Germany and then throughout Europe. Weishaupt made a strategic change that worked miracles for the international spread of his goals. He infiltrated agents into the Freemasonic lodges of England and Scotland, changing their highest tenets to his own, until every lodge in every nation accepted them. Thus, the Illuminati now had two centers of activity, Germany and Britain. It was from Germany to London that the apostate Jews Karl Marx and Frederick Engels were sent to devise the rot of communism. Shortly after that task was done, the Rothschilds sent their agents John Jacob Astor and Jacob Schiff from Germany to America. They financed the robber barons like Rockefeller and Morgan, who in 1922, founded the Council On Foreign Relations, to overthrow the American constitution and switch the nation's diplomacy to Illuminatiism.

THE REAL WAR AGAINST THE JEWS AND HUMANITY

In 1932, how many organizations in Germany represented German Jewry? Over 250. In 1933, how many? One, and one only; Labour Zionism. We will return to the significance shortly.
First, Rabbi Antelman's account continues. To corrupt the Jews, the Frankists adopted, at first, a humane policy of sorts. With Rothschild money and Jesuit power, the so-called Enlightenment was initiated by the German Jewish apostate Moses Mendelsohn. Napoleon was financed to liberate the Jews wherever he conquered and from Germany, the Reform and Conservative movements were financed to further dilute the faith and introduce totally foreign concepts to their congregations. But the pace wasn't fast enough. The ornery Jews just weren't cooperating with evil, so those stubbornly accepting Torah morality would have to be removed permanently and only those practising Shabbatainism would be permitted to survive.
Yes, in the 2000 years of European Jewish history there were pogroms, Crusades and Inquisitions, the latter aided and abetted by the Jesuits. But compared to what happened from the 1880s on, life was a tolerable picnic. The turning point in the final war against the Jews was the founding of Zionism by the Shabbataians. The final aim of the movement was to establish a Shabbataian state in the historical land of the Jews, thus taking over Judaism for good.
To foment the idea, life had to made so intolerable for Europe's Jews, that escape to Palestine would appear to be the best option. The Cossack pogroms were the first shot in this campaign and for them, the Frankists turned to the Jesuits and their influence over the Catholic Church. The Jesuits had done more to spread communism, beginning with their feudal communes in South America, and now they wanted to punish the anti-papists of Europe by imprisoning them behind communal bars. The deal was simple: The Jesuits provided the Cossacks, the Frankists, the communists. And naturally, the Rothschilds would provide the moolah.
Once the situation turned foreboding, the German-writing intellectuals took over. In Vienna in 1885, the journalist Natan Birnbaum fired the opening salvo which successfully planted the fast-growing seeds of Zionism. He was followed by another Vienna writer, Peretz Smoleskin, who provided more intellectual justification for returning to a safe home in Israel. However, neither man had the charisma of still another Vienna writer, Theodore Herzl. He could rally the masses as neither of them could and he was chosen to be the spokesman and symbol of the movement.
Read any honest biography of Herzl and the same quandary appears. Herzl claimed he wrote the Judenstaat one summer in Paris. But Herzl wasn't in Paris when he said he wrote the most influential book of Zionism. It had to have been written for him. Anyone who reads Herzl's dreadful plays, has to doubt his sudden departure from literary mediocrity.
In 1901, Herzl appeared in Britain where he was not well received. We are told he backed another option, creating a Jewish sanctuary in British - controlled East Africa. If the idea caught on, it would neutralize the Shabbataians' game plan. Herzl died not long after and not one biography of him tells us how. He entered a Paris sanatorium for a not known condition and never emerged. This was highly fortunate for the British Freemasons doing the Shabbataians' bidding, for they replaced Herzl with one of their own, a German-educated Jew named Chaim Weizmann. In time, a cockamamie legend was fabricated involving the Balfour declaration creating a Jewish homeland in Palestine as a reward for Weizmann finding a way to make acetone for explosives from dried up paint. Not one explosion in World War One came from this magic process. But the British took great pains to capture Palestine from the Turks and appoint the leaders of the upcoming Shabbataian state.
Meeting in London during the War, Weizmann and Balfour had to deal with the problem of the people already living in Palestine, most of whom were religious Jews, who were the majority in such major centers as Jerusalem, Sfat and Tiberius. The myth of an ancient Palestinian Arab indigenous population is belied by any number of reports by visitors as talented as Twain and Balzac, who accurately noted the paucity of Arabs in the land during the 19th century. The later economic success of the new enterprise drew hundreds of thousands of Arabs from as far away as Iraq to the region with consequences the Illuminati were possibly well aware of.
To neutralize the religious Jews, many of whom had been living in the land since antiquity, Balfour and Weizmann inducted Rabbi Avraham Kook into the fold and after the war, he was appointed the first Chief Rabbi of the enterprise, while Weizmann was made the first head of the Jewish Agency. Kook proceeded to strip the landed Orthodox Jews of their real estate and political rights, while introducing a new concept into Judaism; the purity of land redemption. His philosophy was based on profound historical truth, nonetheless, his followers don't understand how he and they are playing out the Shabbataian nightmare.
Stage one was complete. Now the real business at hand was revved up. Rabbi Antelman proves that the American President Woodrow Wilson was thoroughly corrupted by the Frankists through their agent Colonel House. It was Wilson who put an end to America's open immigration policy. Until then, despite all their despair, most Eastern European Jews rejected Palestine as an escape route, the majority choosing America as their destination. From now on very few would enjoy that option. It would have to be Palestine or nowhere.
We now jump to 1933. Less than 1% of the German Jews support Zionism. Many tried to escape from Naziism by boat to Latin and North American ports but the international diplomatic order was to turn them back. Any German Jew who rejected Palestine as his shelter would be shipped back to his death.
By 1934, the majority of German Jews got the message and turned to the only Jewish organization allowed by the Nazis, the Labour Zionists. For confirmation of the conspiracy between them and Hitler's thugs read The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black, Perfidy by Ben Hecht or The Scared And The Doomed by Jacob Nurenberger. The deal cut worked like this. The German Jews would first be indoctrinated into Bolshevism in Labour Zionism camps and then, with British approval, transferred to Palestine. Most were there by the time the British issued the White Paper banning further Jewish immigration. The Labour Zionists got the Jews they wanted, and let the millions of religious Jews and other non-Frankists perish in Europe without any struggle for their survival.
But not all Jews fell for the plan. A noble alternative Zionism arose led by Zeev Jabotinsky. He led the Jews in demanding free passage to Palestine and a worldwide economic boycott of the Nazi regime. The Labour Zionists did all in their power to short-circuit the opposition. First, they forced all the German Jews in Palestine to use their assets to buy only goods from Nazi Germany. This kept the regime afloat. Then Chaim Weizmann and his Jewish Agency employed their appointed agents in the US to neutralize Jabotinsky and his followers using any means at their disposal. This culminated in Jabotinsky's suspicious death in New York in 1941. Later, Jabotinsky's most literate advocate, Ben Hecht, was run over by a truck on a Manhattan sidewalk. His crime was being the first to widely expose the Jewish Agency-Nazi plot.
Into this plot against the Jews we add the Jesuits, who wished with all their hearts, to wreck the land that produced Luther, but the Vatican's role in the Holocaust is not the focus of this overview. We now return to America where the Jewish leadership used all their contacts and resources to make good and certain that the unwanted non-Shabbataian Jews of Europe never again saw the light of day.
We return to a quote from Jerry Rabow:

pp 132 - Frankist families, both those living as Christians and those living as Jews, tried to marry only among themselves. In the summers, the German groups regularly held secret meetings in the resort of Carlsbad...It is said by the middle of the nineteenth century, the majority of the lawyers in Prague and Warsaw were from Frankist families. United States Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter is reported to have received a copy of Eva Frank's portrait from his mother, a descendent of the Prague Frankist family.

Here is a quote from Frankfurter:

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the
scenes."-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

The difference between Rabow and Rabbi Antelman is the latter proves that literally all of FDR's court Jews were German-descended Sabbataians, determined to purge Jewry of its unnecessary European, non-Sabbataian morality-believing cohorts. Here is a short list of these Jewish community leaders:

Felix Brandeis - Received Secondary School education in Germany. There, Englishman Jacob de Haas introduced him to Zionism.
Henry Morgenthau Jr., Stephen Wise, Bernard Baruch, Judah Magnes, Felix Warburg - All descended from German Jews. Here is a telling quote from the latter Frankist family:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether
World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -- Statement made before the
United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg ("Angel" to and active in the
United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James' brother Max, banker to the German government.

When World War II ended, barely 100,000 European Jews survived and when they arrived in Palestine they had to obey Bolshevik edicts or starve to death. However, they weren't enough to stave off the number one threat to the Frankist state, the Arabs. The wrath of the savage tribes threatened the whole enterprise and only the infusion of large numbers of soldiers could stave off their invasion. To that end, European-controlled Arab dictators were persuaded to go against their national interests, stir up bloody anti-semitism and get the Sephardic Jews to Israel. Their first reward was wealth through seizure of Jews' assets.
Before the Shabbataians introduced it, there was no such thing as Jewish self-hatred. Their religion and heritage came as naturally as breathing. This was the state the Eastern Jews were in when they were driven to Israel. There, the Frankists had to apply all the lessons they learned turning German Jews into their image to change the newcomers. Every effort was made to divest these peoples of their faith and the results were often shattering.

***

Exciting news. I am a feature player in a new 3 hour long DVD called Clear And Present Danger. While I was visiting Atlanta, director Steve Stavro filmed me discussing the Vatican and its relationship to Israel. Somehow I fit into the film, which is a serious expose of the Vatican sect, the Jesuits. The most compelling and disturbing sections are the convincing arguments that American Presidents such as Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, Lincoln and Kennedy were all murdered by the Jesuits. My role is not so grandiose. I tell how Israel is manipulated by the Vatican. I will send you a copy for $25 plus postage, meaning $28 for America, $30 for out of the US.
And I'll add a DVD of my own free: Choose Vatican Update from either Atlanta or Jerusalem, or in Hebrew with a separate lecture called Save Israel (Hatzeelu Et Yisrael) where my Vatican research is explained in our original tongue.

WE have reached a milestone in my signed and numbered manuscript, 1971. Number 62 of the 100 first editions was purchased by T.W. of England. But I'm deeply hurt that 5 recipients, people I've known for years, have not nor may ever, purchase what they ordered. In my little world, that is the ultimate setback, from people I trusted. But over half of recipients have sent glowing reviews. "Yes, I was working on a clever thank you card, and should have told you I got it. Looks like a hoot, I really appreciate the inscription (#44)! J.D." Get the MS, remember half are now gone, or remain, depending on your viewpoint.

You might enjoy my exclusive e-mail list. I keep you informed of all hidden, obscure news for a minor cost. My readers swear by the service. Get on for a free month by writing me at: chamish@netvision.net.il After that...if you liked it...you pay a bit. That's the deal but only my closest readers are sticking to it. I remember them all, just as I recall the hurtful setbacks.

And if you believe, at long last, that I am the only writer telling close to the whole truth, it's time to say so with a contribution!

Barry Chamish
POB 840157
Saint Augustine, FL 32080

Paypal: chamishba@gmail.com

Hear my radio show:

http://www.libertyarchives.com/ "