butlincat's blog - a blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

butlincat's blog...a seeker of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...

This site is shadowbanned, as daily viewing figures prove since March 2018, when before then the figures were 10 times as much as they have been since. "Shadowbanning" is the act of blocking or partially blocking a user or their content from an online community - see more: What is SHADOWBANNING: Twitter: are you shadowbanned? - truther sites are targeted, eg: NewsGuard Launches War on Alternative Media - "Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others." - Charles Bukowski

“As long as justice is postponed we always stand on the verge of these darker nights of social disruption”...so said Martin Luther King Jr. in a speech on March 14, 1968, just three weeks before he was assassinated.

...hello + welcome!....FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License..... For more information please visit:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

Targeted? victimised?...been dealt particularly "rough justice"? meet some who have, and still are! VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

This blog is for regular updates + info connected to the ILLUMINATI, 911, 7/7, recent UFO sightings, CHEMTRAILS, MORGELLONS [98% OF WORLDS POPULATION HAS MORGELLONS DISEASE, they claim - see #Morgellons & #SmartDust Infect Individuals to be Tracked via Satellite https://www.youtu.be/RvNDk2t8TGk], MIND CONTROL {MK ULTRA.MANNEQUIN etc.}, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, JOHN LEAR, ALEX COLLIER, PROJECT CAMELOT, PROJECT AVALON, MICHAEL TSARION, JORDAN MAXWELL, PRESTON NICHOLS, AL BIELEK, STEWART SWERDELOW, DUNCAN CAMERON, WILLIAM COOPER, PHIL SCHNEIDER, David Wilcock, FRITZ SPRINGMEIER, BILLY MEIER, MAX IGAN, STEW WEBB, "Democracy Now!", Henry Makow, Linda Moulton-Howe, Dan Burisch, Webster Tarpley, Brother Nathanael, Timothy Good, Miles Johnson, Jim Marrs, John Hutchison, Wikileaks, Julian Assange, Dr. John Hall, Edward Snowden, Vladimir Putin, John Lennon, Bob Zimmerman + many more who can only be described as heroes...

Wordpress: VICTIMS OF THE STATE https://butlincat.com/

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/butlincat

facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/butlin.cat.9

"Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap." Galatians 6:7

......Namaste.....John Graham - butlincat

Jai guru deva om जय गुरुदेव ॐ


Thursday, 31 January 2013

MICHAEL DOHERTY FULL UPDATE + VIDEOS 31 JAN 13

DOH 2A

MICHAEL DOHERTY UPDATE (02 of 2013) - 29 JANUARY2013

Dear ALL,
If you haven't heard it yet, there have been serious developments and the usual attacks that come with standing up against police corruption are well underway. Michael Doherty on trial 22nd january Stevenage Magistrates court Many of you will have heard by now that I have been pronounced GUILTY of assaulting a court security guard at Cambridge Magistrates on 7.8.2012 ...

The case was heard at Stevenage Magistrates over 3 days last week, during the course of which each and every witness was taken apart for giving false testimony. The lies were blatant and demonstrated when i produced a 'secret' audio recording that I had made on the day. The claims by the court security guards, when compared against the audio were proved to be flagrantly false. The claims that I was SHOUTING "JUST GO AWAY" to polite inquiries by the head of security Nigel Carder were shown to have never happened. This was the alleged operative reason I was forcibly assaulted and physically removed from the public courts. Many of you will remember that it was audio recordings of calls to the police that proved back in 2008 that the police were also telling lies in a malicious prosecution.
This case is a mirror of that and demonstrates the dangers of these public officials who are prepared to willfully lie in order to attempt justification for their unlawful actions. In the police prosecution in 2009, I was found NOT GUILTY, clearly they couldn't risk that this time and irrespective of the evidence a GUILTY verdict was returned. Turning to the alleged assault, which at it's highest is an allegation I 'attempted to punch' the head of security. There is NO allegation that anyone, other than me was touched in anyway. The allegation, during the course of events changed from a 'raised fist' at the point of arrest to 'swung an arm' during interview through to coordinated witnesses at trial claiming they saw a definite 'straight right punch'. Watch the video below and make up your own minds. As you will see I am dragged to the court door and whilst standing outside the court, waiting for the arrival of police,

I am violently shoved in the chest by court security guard Nigel Carder. You will see me falling backwards, my body twisting to my left and then trying to right myself. It is the course of this they have claimed I through a straight right punch.(this was visually demonstrated in court on a number of occasions) This is plainly an impossibility as my right arm (I was on the phone at the time) was thrown across my body during the shove. The ONLY possible action that could have taken place from this position would be a 'backhand' movement........

The PCSO gave evidence that he was standing to my right and rear and that from this position he had a clear view of a straight right punch being thrown. A clear side profile confirmed visually in the Magistrates. I then brought the PCSO Hurley to the monitor and asked him to identify the person standing to my rear and left on the video. He confirmed it was him and that indeed he wasn't as stated standing to my right........
More case anomalies such as court CCTV which was not disclosed or street CCTV which would have been decisive was never collected by police. People claiming to have heard things when they were proven not to have even been there or a police officer that admitted to doing NO investigation and only viewing the CCTV footage once.... It is significant in the case that the alleged victim Nigel Carder was also the individual who controlled the CCTV disclosure from the courts. Explaining why all the CCTV wasn't disclosed, he stated

"I gave you what I thought you might need"

No MR Carder, it is the defenses decision as to what footage it might need, the prosecutions responsibility is to provide all material which may assist the defense or undermine the prosecutions case. CCTV material has now been destroyed, it should have been secured, on that basis alone the case should have been thrown out on it's ear for abuse of process. These are the kinds of underhand tactics that are being used to attempt to secure convictions so that they can smear those who refuse to bow to corrupt practice.

The court case itself was dramatic and if you didn't get down you really missed out on some action packed high drama court proceedings. Lines of questioning in the trial were quite a revelation and material collected will be very useful in the future prosecution of certain individuals involved. Amazingly, the MITIE security staff confirmed that they are woefully under trained, this is the kind of people we are going to face with future privatisation of police.... Amusingly, the head of security claimed that he was exercising Sec.53 of the Courts Act 2003 to forcibly remove me from the building. When I asked him what Sec.53 stated he was clueless and simply said it 'allows me to throw you out'...

Clearly an individual he purports to exercise a power provided by Parliament, ought properly to know what that power is! How can he exercise it if he hasn't the foggiest what it is or how it is supposed to operate. It appears we are simply dealing with 'nightclub bouncers' in our Public Courts. I have been contacted by an very interesting Human rights lawyer who wishes to take the case forward in relation to breach of my Constitutional rights of access to the British Courts. It is important to understand that I was in the court exercising another Constitutional right, seeking to lay an information to commence criminal prosecution. Case law is clear on this that this Constitutional right MUST not be hindered or impeded.......

Additionally, this will be going to appeal. In addition to the flagrant lies from prosecution witnesses, there are considerable procedural impropriety in the hearing. Once such failure was the refusal of the magistrates to permit me to enter an abuse of process argument, the reason for his is that the case would have had to be thrown out. They needed to reach the verdict stage so that they could trot out their perverse decision which was clearly against the evidence adduced in the case. Make up what you will of the matter from the linked video from one of the many people that came out in support. Remember that this is your money and your public resource being wasted in pursuit of vindictive protection of a corrupt few.

"STITCH UP" the film -



Is this British Justice in the 21st Century.... Private prosecution of two Metropolitan Police officers This case is back before SOUTHWARK Crown court on the 1st of February 2013 at 10am. Again please attend if you are in the area, this is a case management hearing and the officers will not be in attendance. I do know that other like minded people will be in attendance, so it's always a good opportunity to hook up and share ideas. Dailymail article on this case for those needing a refresher;

First Private Prosecution -
Met member of staff Tracey Murphy Still awaiting a decision from the high court as to when this matter will be listed, to challenge the CPS' attempt to take it over and shut it down... New files have been prepared in pursuit of this prosecution and I anticipate some big announcement soon....

UPHELD IPCC DECISION Yesterday I received another upheld IPCC decision on appeal. The matter relates to the conduct of Detective Chief Inspector Dave Corbett of the Metropolitan Police's professional standards dept. He was caught out abusing his position following a member of the Metropolitan Police leaking me an offensive email which he was the author. DCI Corbett was cleared initially by the Met Police but this has now been reversed on appeal to the IPCC. The IPCC has demanded 'management action' in relation to his unprofessional conduct which was a clear breach of Police code of conduct. Importantly this officer has been responsible for conducting investigations into police corruption in my case over the last 3yrs....
In his email he referred to me as 'THE BEAST ......'.
No wonder that he did everything in his power to rubbish the clearly evidenced allegations I have made... As they say, it all eventually comes out in the wash. FUNDING Any one wishing to make a donation, financial or offers of assistance to the JusticeNOW campaign, please make contact. Many thanks to those of you that have contributed to assist this work, you know who you are and your help has been very helpful and vital to this work. Dates for your diary 1st of February 2013 - Southwark Crown Court - case management hearing in relation to prosecution of officers MacDonald & Blackburn
---------------------
MEDIA COVERAGE OF MY CASE SO FAR

1. http://ruvr.co.uk/2012_10_26/92563915/ [Voice of Russia Radio interview]
2. http://poultonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/09/public-confidence-in-our-police-force-is-at-an-all-time-low-how-will-faith-be-restored.html [Dailymail]
3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9477981/Police-officers-in-court-as-man-brings-private-prosecution.html [Telegraph]
4. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2188837/Two-Met-Police-officers-smas hed-way-aircraft-engineers-home-battering-ram-kidnapped-him.html#ixzz23oc0tK3Q [Dailymail]
5. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/15/police-accused-kidnap-private-prosecution [Guardian]
6.http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/12/police-truth-blair-peach-tomlinson [Guardian]
7. http://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4PQp1NQ39MPYzU5NDVhY2QtMWViYi00MDRkLWE4OWQtOTc2NjA5MWZiNWI3/edit [Private Eye]
8. http://rt.com/news/yard-police-secretary-doherty/ [Russia Today]
9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOmUDXZ77Qw&feature=share [BBC News]
10. http://www.uxbridgegazette.co.uk/west-london-news/local-uxbridge-news/2012/08/17/two-police-officers-in-court-113046-31642144/
VIDEOS of campaign
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9OgJPEFoRs [1st May 2012] Abolish the IPCC demonstration, London [part 2]
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytUiijF1B9E [1st May 2012] Abolish the IPCC demonstration, London [part 1]
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_TrL4USIo0 [12 June 2012] Protest against Police corruption, London
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOM_VdyMWSU [17 June 2012] Protest against Police corruption, London. Includes MP Mark Pritchard
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49Mwmv1I5Dk&feature=plcp&list=PLQ0wLt6fVmGIIs73zrVreqKjWCGJm918q [15 August 2012] Cops in the Dock - Westminster Magistrates
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8YtQDzK2Rg [22 August 2012] Beach Interview - ref alleged court security assault
7. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FK_Q9faWU8 [11 September 2012] update - reference alleged court security assault
8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBQ1fURjVnQ [16 October 2012] update - outside Stoke Mandeville hospital
9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPry73WESQk [1st January 2013] Michael Doherty's New year message
10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=m0qlmziHjhY [Call to Stevenage Magistrates court trial]
11. "STITCH UP" the film - PART 1 http://t.co/BgyXt6cB PART 2 http://t.co/LBKvHNKu
-----------------------------------------------------------------

CAMBRIDGE MAGISTRATES CCTV - RAW FOOTAGE
Many of you have seen the CCTV from upstairs in the court now but not the full footage from downstairs. Well here you now can, as you will see I come into the court building, to speak to the PCSO following calling the Police.
You will see me go over to a quiet part of the court entrance while I await the arrival of the police, which the PCSO had confirmed he'd call. You well then see the sudden arrival of chubby boy who, clearly aggressive wants to remove me for....

well standing quietly talking on my phone. I was infact speaking to the court trying to organise the laying of the information. Well what happens next is the subject of the controversy as I am dragged from the court once again, the security guard claims i attempted to throw a straight right punch....
he fails to mention that the oaf is shoving me violently in the chest at the time...
Downstatirs raw CCTV


Upstairs raw CCTV

=============================================
OUTRAGEOUS - FROM MICHAEL DOHERTY FOUND GUILTY OF ASSAULTING A COURT EMPLOYEE

23 JAN 13

from M. DOHERTY: "ANNOUNCEMENT:

Here is a funny angle to my case, I AUDIO recorded this whole situation. During the course of the case I produced the RECORDING, coupled to the CCTV and SMASHED their witnesses as liars utter perversion of the course of justice and the magistrates still convicted......
I can firmly say these courts are utterly corrupt. Not to worry, I will publish up all the material in due course to let you watch, listen and JUDGE for yourself... ...
Peace to you all and I am overwhelmed with the support across the country and those that attended the court. The public gallery rose as one and demonstrated their contempt for the Magistrates and their baseless decision... They have picked the wrong case as this utterly evidentially demonstrates their corrupt practice...

CLICK FOR VIDEO:

########################################################

MICHAEL DOHERTY ON THE RADIO WITH SHERRI KANE AND DR. LEN HOROWITZ 28 DEC


BOYCOTT

"Ok back from court in Hertford Magistrates, a 2 hr case management hearing. - as usual CPS still failed to follow court orders, as usual given time extensions despite objections that 4 mths is long enough...
- case is setdown for 3 days starting 22nd January 2013 ...
- My Abuse of process argument to run on 17/1/2013 - Prosecution have added more witnesses, now 10 in total. Nothing like padding out a worthless and hopeless case - ALL prosecutions witnesses need to be produced at trial.. - One of the court security looks like he's got a conviction for a serious assault....

- I withdrew my plea and entered NO CASE TO ANSWER. The District Judge, who has no power of attorney over me entered a plea on my behalf. I advised her she was responsible for the case outcome and insisted the court record was updated with this info - I also made it known that my belief, from experience, is that the Magistrates is not a fair or lawful court....

A second 'apprentice' judge was sitting in, she smiled sweetly at me through proceedings.. ;)"

please scroll down this pae for more articles on this shocking case...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The case, from the "Telegraph" August 12:

Police officers in court as man brings private prosecution
Two police officers have appeared in court accused of burglary, kidnap and false imprisonment after a judge granted the alleged victim the right to bring a rare private prosecution.

Michael Doherty arriving at Westminster Magistrates Court
Michael Doherty arriving at Westminster Magistrates Court Photo: NNP

By , Crime Correspondent
6:01PM BST 15 Aug 2012
Sergeant Gareth Blackburn, 38, and Detective Constable Stephen MacDonald, 42, were summonsed to appear before Westminster Magistrates Court to face a string of allegations related to an arrest they made on a man suspected of harassing a colleague in September 2008.
Former aircraft engineer Michael Doherty, 40, claimed the officers turned up at his house at 6.30am, smashed down his door with a battering ram in front of his terrified family, before handcuffing him and dragging him to the police station.
Mr Doherty was granted permission to bring the case by a district judge who also ordered that both Metropolitan Police officers attend yesterday’s preliminary hearing.
The origins of the case date back to 2008 when Mr Doherty made a serious allegation to the police in Hillingdon, West London.
Frustrated at what he considered was a lack of progress in the investigation, Mr Doherty made a number of phone calls to his local police station.

He was subsequently accused of harassing a civilian police worker at the station, and the two officers arrived at his home to investigate the complaint. When Mr Doherty refused to let the officers into his home, he alleges they broke down his door and forcibly took him into custody. Mr Doherty was later cleared of all charges but applied for permission to bring a private prosecution against the arresting officers. The summons issued by District Judge Deborah Wright at Uxbridge Magistrates last month, stated that the two officers were accused of trespass and an attempt to inflict grievous bodily harm on the home owner. The summons aid: "You were on the property as a trespasser and you threatened to smash down a glass-panelled door which the homeowner was holding closed.

"You threatened and used a battering ram to support your threat of violence. The occupants were caused fear for their personal safety. "You wilfully failed to perform your duty to such a degree that it amounted to an abuse of the public trust which had been placed in you." The summons also stated that the officers were alleged to have carried Mr Doherty away without any lawful authority. “There was no consent from the victim and you used unlawful violence to carry out this kidnap," the document stated. It went on: "You were tasked to carry out enquiries into allegations of harassment, however when lawfully refused entry to the home of Mr Doherty you did without lawful authority force entry into their private home.” It is extremely rare for a summons to be issued against police officers as part of a private prosecution.

Criminal cases are usually brought by the Crown Prosecution Service, but people can pursue their own actions under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. Both police officers, who remain on full duties, are due to appear before Southwark Crown Court on October 19 for a Plea and Case Management Hearing.
soe more:

-------------------------------------------------------

MORE =

Two police officers accused of kidnap in private prosecution

District judge issues summons in case brought by man who claims police unlawfully entered home and forcibly removed him
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/15/police-accused-kidnap-private-prosecution?CMP=twt_gu

Adoption and children in state care across England:

 

Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data

How have the numbers and rates of adoption and local authority care in England changed since 2011?
Get the data
More data journalism and data visualisations from the Guardian
 
  • inter-racial adoption
     
  • 70 babies were adopted in England in 2011/12 - up by 10 on the previous year's total Photograph: Getty
    3,450 children were adopted in England between April 2011 and March 2011, up 12% on the previous year, according to figures published by the Department for Education.
    28,220 children started being looked after by their local authority in the same period, of which 10,100 were taken into care under a care order, police protection, an emergency protection order or a child assessment order.
  •    *Refers only the those taken into care under the conditions listed above

    Most children are adopted between the ages of one and four

    2,550 - or around three quarters - of children adopted in 2011/12 were aged between one and four. Five- to nine-year-olds accounted for the second largest number of adoptions, while 70 babies (under one year old) were adopted, an increase of 10 on 2010/11. 
  • 'Abuse or neglect' remains the predominant category of needOf the 93,020 children looked after by their local authority at some point in 2011/12, over half were given the 'abuse or neglect' code**. Family dysfunction was the second most used category, accounting for roughly one case in seven.
  • SEE PICS:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england

    The ethnic mix

    75% of children looked after by local authorities at any point in 2011/12 were white, but white children made up 85% of adoptions.
    Comparisons between the ethnic breakdown of all looked-after children and all adopted children show that Asian or Asian British and black or black British children were statistically less likely to be adopted than white or mixed race children.

    SEE PICS:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england

    Adoption rates by region

    Of children in Bolton ceasing to be looked after by local authorities in 2011/12, 29% were adopted - the highest rate in England. Croydon had the lowest rate, with just 2% of children leaving local authority care being adopted.
      

    Darker shades correspond to higher adoption rates. Red shading indicates local authorities where, to protect confidentiality, figures were not published. Click here for fullscreen mapClick a local authority on the map to view the number of children looked after as of 31 March 2012, the number ceasing to be looked after during the previous year and the proportion of those who were adopted.
    **It should be noted that whilst this does not necessarily correspond to the entire reason a child begins to be looked after, it is the most applicable of the eight 'need codes'.

    Data summary

    Children lookde after by local authorities and adopted, 2012

    Click headings to sort table. Download the data
    Area
    Total number of children looked after
    Number who ceased to be looked after during the year
    Number adopted during the year
    % adopted during the year
    Barking and Dagenham 425 205 20 9.76
    Barnet 300 165 15 9.09
    Barnsley 225 130 25 19.23
    Bath and North East Somerset 165 85 10 11.76
    Bedford Borough 215 75 10 13.33
    Bexley 240 120 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Birmingham 1895 665 70 10.53
    Blackburn with Darwen 360 145 20 13.79
    Blackpool 435 115 15 13.04
    Bolton 515 170 50 29.41
    Bournemouth 250 95 15 15.79
    Bracknell Forest 100 40 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Bradford 895 305 55 18.03
    Brent 360 230 10 4.35
    Brighton and Hove 485 215 25 11.63
    Bristol, City of 685 285 45 15.79
    Bromley 275 115 10 8.70
    Buckinghamshire 370 145 20 13.79
    Bury 325 120 15 12.50
    Calderdale 355 105 10 9.52
    Cambridgeshire 470 170 30 17.65
    Camden 265 160 10 6.25
    Central Bedfordshire 210 90 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Cheshire East 435 135 25 18.52
    Cheshire West and Chester 365 145 20 13.79
    City Of London 5 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Cornwall 480 245 40 16.33
    Coventry 580 260 25 9.62
    Croydon 745 415 10 2.41
    Cumbria 600 150 30 20.00
    Darlington 205 110 15 13.64
    Derby 480 180 40 22.22
    Derbyshire 700 250 50 20.00
    Devon 710 340 15 4.41
    Doncaster 510 210 35 16.67
    Dorset 300 120 15 12.50
    Dudley 680 130 20 15.38
    Durham 660 245 35 14.29
    Ealing 410 205 15 7.32
    East Midlands 4740 1870 280 14.97
    East of England 6430 2690 350 13.01
    East Riding of Yorkshire 315 140 20 14.29
    East Sussex 620 190 20 10.53
    Enfield 310 155 10 6.45
    ENGLAND 67050 27350 3450 12.61
    Essex 1485 685 95 13.87
    Gateshead 385 145 25 17.24
    Gloucestershire 460 200 15 7.50
    Greenwich 565 310 25 8.06
    Hackney 305 110 20 18.18
    Halton 125 65 10 15.38
    Hammersmith and Fulham 225 115 10 8.70
    Hampshire 1105 465 50 10.75
    Haringey 575 295 15 5.08
    Harrow 155 105 5 4.76
    Hartlepool 175 75 15 20.00
    Havering 185 115 5 4.35
    Herefordshire 210 110 10 9.09
    Hertfordshire 1055 480 40 8.33
    Hillingdon 375 225 15 6.67
    Hounslow 320 170 15 8.82
    Inner London 4560 2240 210 9.38
    Isle Of Wight 160 95 15 15.79
    Isles Of Scilly 0 0 0 0.00
    Islington 330 140 20 14.29
    Kensington and Chelsea 140 60 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Kent 1800 830 70 8.43
    Kingston Upon Hull, City of 615 210 55 26.19
    Kingston Upon Thames 125 40 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Kirklees 640 190 25 13.16
    Knowsley 255 70 20 28.57
    Lambeth 510 245 20 8.16
    Lancashire 1325 470 70 14.89
    Leeds 1475 405 65 16.05
    Leicester 520 190 20 10.53
    Leicestershire 375 175 20 11.43
    Lewisham 500 210 30 14.29
    Lincolnshire 500 230 45 19.57
    Liverpool 900 290 50 17.24
    London 10250 5310 420 7.91
    Luton 385 160 10 6.25
    Manchester 1310 500 55 11.00
    Medway Towns 445 175 15 8.57
    Merton 130 95 10 10.53
    Middlesbrough 350 185 20 10.81
    Milton Keynes 280 125 15 12.00
    Newcastle Upon Tyne 550 190 25 13.16
    Newham 445 225 25 11.11
    Norfolk 1010 405 65 16.05
    North East 4110 1670 280 16.77
    North East Lincolnshire 155 50 10 20.00
    North Lincolnshire 170 70 15 21.43
    North Somerset 230 110 5 4.55
    North Tyneside 300 120 20 16.67
    North West 11360 3910 590 15.09
    North Yorkshire 480 165 20 12.12
    Northamptonshire 795 335 30 8.96
    Northumberland 280 105 20 19.05
    Nottingham 540 215 30 13.95
    Nottinghamshire 800 285 45 15.79
    Oldham 325 140 25 17.86
    Outer London 5680 3070 210 6.84
    Oxfordshire 450 235 30 12.77
    Peterborough 335 130 10 7.69
    Plymouth 385 160 30 18.75
    Poole 160 55 5 9.09
    Portsmouth 300 130 15 11.54
    Reading 240 95 20 21.05
    Redbridge 215 110 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Redcar and Cleveland 170 60 10 16.67
    Richmond Upon Thames 75 55 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Rochdale 450 145 20 13.79
    Rotherham 380 150 25 16.67
    Rutland 30 15 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Salford 555 205 20 9.76
    Sandwell 575 190 15 7.89
    Sefton 400 115 10 8.70
    Sheffield 610 290 45 15.52
    Shropshire 205 105 15 14.29
    Slough 170 95 15 15.79
    Solihull 365 170 5 2.94
    Somerset 495 300 40 13.33
    South East 8720 3810 430 11.29
    South Gloucestershire 210 100 5 5.00
    South Tyneside 315 115 30 26.09
    South West 5450 2450 280 11.43
    Southampton 430 150 20 13.33
    Southend-on-Sea 240 110 25 22.73
    Southwark 550 260 20 7.69
    St Helens 335 95 10 10.53
    Staffordshire 875 260 45 17.31
    Stockport 300 125 25 20.00
    Stockton-On-Tees 335 150 15 10.00
    Stoke-On-Trent 440 170 30 17.65
    Suffolk 780 285 60 21.05
    Sunderland 390 175 50 28.57
    Surrey 805 305 35 11.48
    Sutton 155 85 5 5.88
    Swindon 255 90 10 11.11
    Tameside 390 145 20 13.79
    Telford and Wrekin 300 125 25 20.00
    Thurrock 240 110 10 9.09
    Torbay 250 110 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Tower Hamlets 295 205 10 4.88
    Trafford 280 95 5 5.26
    Wakefield 435 135 30 22.22
    Walsall 490 170 35 20.59
    Waltham Forest 310 155 15 9.68
    Wandsworth 215 105 15 14.29
    Warrington 235 125 15 12.00
    Warwickshire 680 295 30 10.17
    West Berkshire 125 60 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    West Midlands 8470 3000 370 12.33
    West Sussex 675 370 50 13.51
    Westminster 210 105 10 9.52
    Wigan 480 140 25 17.86
    Wiltshire 415 150 20 13.33
    Windsor and Maidenhead 95 55 5 9.09
    Wirral 675 200 25 12.50
    Wokingham 70 35 Hidden to protect confidentiality Hidden to protect confidentiality
    Wolverhampton 575 160 20 12.50
    Worcestershire 600 200 20 10.00
    York 255 85 15 17.65
    Yorkshire and The Humber 7530 2640 450 17.05



    Download the data


    Researcher Urges U.S. Military Veterans to Divulge Their UFO Sightings at Nuclear Weapons Sites

    Researcher Urges U.S. Military Veterans to Divulge Their UFO Sightings at Nuclear Weapons Sites

    Bookmark and Share


    By www.reuters.com
    1-30-13
    Robert Hastings
    WASHINGTON, Jan. 30, 2013 – Noted UFO researcher Robert Hastings is asking U.S. military veterans to contact him regarding their UFO-related experiences at nuclear missile sites, weapons storage areas, and atomic/thermonuclear bomb test sites during the Cold War era and beyond.

    On September 27, 2010, Hastings co-sponsored the UFOs and Nukes press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C., which CNN streamed live. See below:


    During the press conference, seven U.S. Air Force veterans discussed UFO incursions at ICBM sites at Malmstrom AFB, Montana, F.E. Warren AFB, Wyoming, and Walker AFB, New Mexico, as well as the Weapons Storage Area at RAF Bentwaters, England.

    The incident at Malmstrom, on March 24, 1967, involved several missiles inexplicably malfunctioning moments after security personnel reported observing a glowing, disc-shaped craft hovering over the Oscar Flight Launch Control Facility. (Other UFO sightings by civilians living near the facility have been reported as recently as September 2012.)

    Similar incidents have occurred at various ICBM bases over the years, according to other veterans interviewed by Hastings. UFOs also reportedly hovered over nuclear bomb storage areas and B-52 bomber alert pads. Declassified documents relating to some of these incidents may be read at www.ufohastings.com/documents.

    Currently, Hastings is chiefly interested in sightings occurring during the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, as well as those that took place over the past decade. However, he is also seeking information relating to any UFO sighting involving nuclear weapons. Hastings hopes to publish as many reports as possible, once they have been vetted, but requests for confidentiality will be honored.

    Hastings notes that Soviet Army veterans have revealed cases of UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites in the former U.S.S.R. Those events have been confirmed by KGB and/or Ministry of Defense documents, including one occurring on October 4, 1982, during which nuclear missiles temporarily activated just as a disc-shaped craft hovered above them. Elsewhere, on July 28/29, 1989, another UFO hovered over a Soviet nuclear missile warhead depot and directed laser-like beams onto it.

    Hastings believes that the American people, and citizens of all nations, deserve to know the facts regarding the reality of UFOs and the ongoing situation involving our nuclear weapons. Military veteran testimony will greatly contribute to this objective. He may be contacted at ufohastings@aol.com.