Preface
"Child Stealing By The State – A Social Worker Speaks" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3noOtwoNo4Q is just one video from the list of very informative "IMPORTANT VIDEOS" shown below, with the UK Column's Brian Gerrish interviewing Carol Woods, from March 2016. The video sees Carol explaining in detail, amongst other subjects: a] the failed "supercasino" project, which was an epic episode in irregularities in itself [also described by Carol here: York LGO Blog re Lancashire CC http://criticalreader2006.blogspot.ae/ b] the death of elderly Sheila Bridges, who died after a heart attack, very strongly [allegedly] caused by the actions of recruited and bullying yobs connected to the "supercasino " project c] the death of former Greater Manchester police chief constable Mike Todd, who deceased after a judge David Williams, connected to the then Social Service's Upper Tribunals department, was given a file of Carol's evidence, d] certain Lancs. Social Services irregularities which saw Carol being hounded out of her job for refusing to alter records of vulnerable children connected to Lancs. Social Services, and e] Carol's move to Lewes, Suffolk, under the advice of MP Norman Baker, which brought on much hostility aimed at Carol, including arrests by police, and the wrecking and theft of Carol's home = Child Stealing By The State - A Social Worker Speaks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3noOtwoNo4Q - please see the other videos listed below and for more background on the atrocious targeting of Carol, which began in 2006 and continues to this very day, every day...
video: ILLEGAL GPS TRACKING DEVICE IN CAROL WOOD'S MOTOR VEHICLE + Lancs. police - 18 Sept. 17 VIDEO
https://vid.me/e/58R14?stats=1
Regarding the illegal "tracking device" installed in Carol Wood's motor vehicle, and despite CW's asking for obligatory information from Lancs. police regarding this device after her paying the proper "Freedom of Information" request fee at Lancs. police Hutton HQ in January 2017 was totally ignored, Lancs. police wanted a letter of permission, finally, from CW so I could interact with Lancs. police on her behalf so my complaint regarding this "tracking device" being installed in Carol Woods motor vehicle [and other matters] could be taken seriously.
One original contact with Lancs. police was 6 months ago in March 2017 [below], which was ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The "Investigations Support Dept." of Lancs. police answered finally recently [below] requiring for a "letter of permission" from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters. Now, after that "letter of permission" was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police as per their recent request received after 5 months from when this subject originally began from this end, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and "Investigations Dept" about this "tracking device"!
Typical recent communication from the Lancs. police "Professional Standards" dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol's car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:

The "letter of permission" from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:

Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol's car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted - including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm claiming - after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., - that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised - the daily persecution continues unabated, though.
"From: Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]
To: Mr. S. Finnegan, Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.
31 March 2017
Dear Mr. Finnegan,
I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.
Ms Carol Woods address is: 28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.
I'm sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] - please see below:
1] The Data Protection Act 1998:
"The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject".
PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and
b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.
and
2] The European Court of Human Rights "Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence"
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."
PLEASE NOTE: referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.
Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
"I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10
but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via
data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk". Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return - an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place - those being the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?
Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.
Thank you.
J. Graham concerned citizen" [ENDS]
After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police "Investigations Team" with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol's car and was being used under "covert police tactics", which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car. Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured - or deceased - party. I myself witnessed - as a passenger in Carol's car when I visited earlier this year - these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol's completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:
"HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE"
16 / 10 / 2017
hi, just got the mail - completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday...JG.] - preface my car was not at an airport car park - apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine - I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair.
Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.
I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister - I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me - he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared - the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it - cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I'd get it] - the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car - I knew I'd have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister's. The insurance matter was awful - I've had other cars and never experienced the antics but - all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 - why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold?
I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits - I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft - I thought of my white Polo - I told them what I thought they were doing - I was right, they had been contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they'ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said "You're dealing with lunatics" - I said, "I know". I went to sit in the office - the DVLA slip I could see - the man in the office assured me he would send it on - I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I'd said I'd drop in with on 22 Jan.
Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key - he'd broken the original, old key, hadn't he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut - they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said "They can't keep on arresting you" - "of course they can - who'll stop them?" I said - a bit more chat - I said I'd be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn't falling for that. It was a trap.
Parking at my sister's then showing her the car - I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record - where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?].
The next morning I went with the £40 - they were not open - or pretended - the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing.
On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company - one I'd used for over 20 years - they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems.
The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it's own story] - just to harass - to be seen to be a liar - then I returned to my sister's. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days - called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks - their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS - and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted.
With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn't need to force the locks - had another spare cut and so it went on.
Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry - at the Uni - washing my hands - my keys placed by the sink disappeared - reported - ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls - again, I'd had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April '16 and May '16] to see if they can remove it but said "too sophisticated" and will disable the car if they try to remove it."
[ENDS]
N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their "Investigations Team"s response was - nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police's so-called "responses" - the IPT's response has also been - nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable - and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the! To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them - completely unaccptable!
THE IPCC:
Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the
a] installation of the "tracking device" in CW's vehicle,
b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,
and
c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response - which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
26 June 2017 at 22:45
Dear Ms. Coulton,
Here, below, is my latest communication to yourself in reply to your message to me, dated 22 June 17.
I DO wish to report as stated to the I.P.C.C. the matters described.
Thank you.
J. Graham concerned citzen
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 22 June 2017 at 12:32
Subject: IPCC Reference - xxxxxxx
To: "butlincat75@googlemail.com" <butlincat75@googlemail.com>Dear Mr Graham
Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.
I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.
If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;
WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?
WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.
If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.
Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the 'appropriate authority' for consideration - usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.
Yours sincerely
Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission
(IPCC)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: butlincat <butlincat75@googlemail.com>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference - 2017/087595
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Dear IPCC
I do wish to raise a complaint against Lancs police
- specifically Mr. S. Finnegan Chief Constable as he refuses to answer numerous messages to him,
specifically the one shown below dated 31 March 17, and against also their Professional Standards, who are mentioned in the attached response [letter] from Lancs police - they still have not contacted me as promised.
Thanks
J. Graham
.
The above communication was replied to in full by the IPCC - the end result simply stating that everything was passed back to Lancs. police by the IPCC - hence the Lancs Police "Investigations Team" finally responding via their "covert police tactics" letter on the 27 September 2017. The next stage was complaining to the IPT, which was done, but has got nowhere as I write on 12 Dec. 17. - the entire process beginning in March 2017 with the letter to the ex-CC Finnegan.
Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this "tracking device" to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] - the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago - her comment:
Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw
Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, "The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs". The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact." [ENDS]
One original contact with Lancs. police was 6 months ago in March 2017 [below], which was ignored, as was every other communication sent until I contacted 3 chief constables a couple of months later regarding not being able to report serious crime to the police, which was also ignored by all sent to, so then I had no choice but to begin complaining about that. The "Investigations Support Dept." of Lancs. police answered finally recently [below] requiring for a "letter of permission" from Carol Woods so as I could interact on her behalf regarding matters. Now, after that "letter of permission" was finally received in writing from CW, and sent to Lancs. police as per their recent request received after 5 months from when this subject originally began from this end, still nothing is done by Lancs. police Professional Standards and "Investigations Dept" about this "tracking device"!
Typical recent communication from the Lancs. police "Professional Standards" dept. regarding my complaint to them regarding the device in Carol's car, which breaches not only the E.C.H.R. but also the Data Protection Act:

The "letter of permission" from Carol Woods, dated 24 August 17, asked for by and sent 25 Aug. 17 to Lancs. police by recorded delivery 1st class Royal Mail, partly acknowledged now by Lancs. police:

Below, the original [ignored] communication from 31 March 2017 to the then Lancs. police chief constable Finnegan regarding the illegal GPS tracking device in Carol's car. All other communications regarding this subject and reporting serious crime are ignored by all police contacted - including my local police, and 3 chief constables, until finally 2 local officers visited myself unexpectedly [after I had written so many times to the Dorset CC trying to make contact with police] on Saturday 9 June 17 at 9pm claiming - after my explaining as best I could the utter chaos Carol is forced to suffer courtesy of the authorities in Lancs., - that they would report matters concerning Carol Woods to Lancs. police, and Carol would be contacted by Lancs. police forthwith. Of course no such contact has been made by Lancs. police to Carol as promised - the daily persecution continues unabated, though.
"From: Mr. J. Graham, [redacted]
To: Mr. S. Finnegan, Chief Constable of Lancashire Police,
Lancashire Constabulary Headquarters,
Saunders Lane,
Hutton nr Preston,
PR4 5SB.
31 March 2017
Dear Mr. Finnegan,
I am writing to you concening the tracking device installed in the motor vehicle used by Ms. CAROL WOODS.
Ms Carol Woods address is: 28 Fell View, Caton, Lancashire, LA2 9RP.
I'm sure you are aware that regarding Ms. Woods motor vehicle, not only does such a device installed in her vehicle contavene 1] the Data Protection Act 1998, but also contravenes Ms. Woods rights according to 2] the European Commission of Human Rights [E.C.H.R.] - please see below:
1] The Data Protection Act 1998:
"The UK vehicle tracker laws fall under the category of processing personal data and accordingly, it is governed by the Data Protection Act 1988. In order to ensure vehicle tracking legality, it is vital that organisations maintain a vehicle tracking policy that is fully transparent and compliant with the Data Protection Act. Under this Act, persons who have tracking devices installed in the vehicles they own have the right to know what information is being held about them and the purpose for which it will be used. For this reason, collecting data covertly is considered to be in breach of the law.
Furthermore, personal data can only be processed if at least one of the following applies:
•The person concerned must have consented to the process
•There is a contractual or legal obligation to process the data
•It is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the subject".
PLEASE NOTE: a] Ms. Woods did not consent to the process of her motor vehicle being tracked, and
b] Ms. Woods has the right to know what information is being held about her and the purpose for which it will be used, but she has never been told anything regarding her motor vehicle being tracked.
and
2] The European Court of Human Rights "Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights provides a right to respect for one's "private and family life, his home and his correspondence"
1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.
2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."
PLEASE NOTE: referring to the European Court of Human Rights, Article 8:
Ms. Woods right to privacy has clearly been breached by the interference of this tracking device installed in her motor vehicle.
Mr. Finnegan, it is clear that such a tracking device installed in Ms. Woods motor vehicle is in clear breach of these 2 statutes cited above, and in the respect of trying to obtain information regarding this tracking device, Ms. Woods states:
"I have asked specifically for the data in relation to PERMISSION for GPS sought and then gained, and paid £10
but received nothing. I TOOK my £10 in Jan 2017 after asking if I needed to pay £10 via
data.protection@lancashire.pnn.police.uk Jan this year, it was acknowledged as received as I drove all the way to HUTTON HQ, to deliver it (I asked them to formally acknowledge receipt) as well as getting a receipt there at the front desk". Therefore Ms. Woods has applied for the information regarding the tracking device in her vehicle, but not received any information in return - an extremely serious irregularity. Can you please remove this device from Ms. Woods motor vehicle that is clearly falling foul of the statutes in place - those being the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Article 8 of the European Commission of Human Rights?
Mr. Finnegan, failure to acknowledge this communication will result in my contacting the highest authorities regarding these breaches of the said statutes stated above.
Thank you.
J. Graham concerned citizen" [ENDS]
After much stalling by the Lancs. police to even admit there was a tracking device in Ms. Woods car this letter below was finally received on the 27 September 17 from Lancs, police "Investigations Team" with the admission that a tracking device was being used in Carol's car and was being used under "covert police tactics", which is quite a remarkable example of bs considering known jihadi terrorists in the UK surely are not stalked as severely, nor are organised criminal gang members. Carol is neither of those, and it is painfully obvious that the only reason the device is being used at all is to blatantly harass and gangstalk Carol every time she goes out and drives her car. Indeed, attempts to murder Carol have taken place when she has been driving her car, when the unemployed stalking yobs who harass Carol all the time anyway have tried a few times to manufacture road traffic accidents where Carol would be the injured - or deceased - party. I myself witnessed - as a passenger in Carol's car when I visited earlier this year - these stalking yobs driving their car perilously close to Carol's completely unneccessarily, and performing outrageous manoevres with the passengers in the offending car looking back, once passed, laughing hysterically at their perverse actions. Again, Lancs. police have much to answer for by paying these thugs to perform such cr-p, deliberately endangering lives in the process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Received from Ms. Carol Woods on 17 OCTOBER 2017:
"HOW THE TRACKING DEVICE CAME TO BE IN MS. CAROL WOODS MOTOR VEHICLE"
16 / 10 / 2017
hi, just got the mail - completely crazy at my return [Ms. Woods had been away on holiday...JG.] - preface my car was not at an airport car park - apparently I am the owner of a silver grey Yaris much newer than mine - I seem to be an Asian female with long, dark hair.
Preface Fell View is now 298 Oxcliffe Rd thus I have just bought my car AND AM NOT THE VICTIM FROM 2012.
I looked on Northern Car Sales site, Shaw Rd. Oldham January 2012 when staying with my sister - I only went onto the yard to get rid of a thug following me - he just used his phone presumably to say I looked at cars. I decided a car for sale was affordable and having a car would solve massive problems. I went back the next day and felt sure they expected me. Another car had appeared - the red Yaris and I was diverted to that. I had a test drive, liked it, agreed to buy it - cash. But the car price was £40 short of [my sister owed me money so I knew I'd get it] - the garage was responsible for completing the tear off strip for DVLA doc. change of owner / address of registered person. All that done, I had to go and get insurance before removing the car - I knew I'd have been arrested for driving without insurance if I drove it just to my sister's. The insurance matter was awful - I've had other cars and never experienced the antics but - all done the garage told me not to collect the car until 5pm on 21/1/12 - why? Surely they just wanted it off the yard as sold?
I went at 3pm to see what they were up to. My ignition was in bits - I was told they had snapped my key in the lock so needed to replace the system to accomodate a new key. I told them I was not daft - I thought of my white Polo - I told them what I thought they were doing - I was right, they had been contacted and told if they wanted to stay in business, they'ed do as told. Gestapo? Yes. Then he said "You're dealing with lunatics" - I said, "I know". I went to sit in the office - the DVLA slip I could see - the man in the office assured me he would send it on - I was using my sister;s address to register the car. He told me not to bother about the £40 which I'd said I'd drop in with on 22 Jan.
Getting the car about 5, I asked why there was no new key - he'd broken the original, old key, hadn't he? I also asked why they had not used the spare key and just had a 2nd as spare cut - they knew I knew exactly what had gone on. Oddly, the man said "They can't keep on arresting you" - "of course they can - who'll stop them?" I said - a bit more chat - I said I'd be in the next morning with £40, was told not to bother but I wasn't falling for that. It was a trap.
Parking at my sister's then showing her the car - I saw 900 miles had been added to the clock from my agreeing to buy it. [I faxed the Home Saecretary and K Clarke at least 3 times each to get that on record - where the hell had I apparently been to use 900 miles?].
The next morning I went with the £40 - they were not open - or pretended - the £40 trap was set. I took a note of the 2 x £20 notes, scribbled a note, put in an envelope and took photos of it going imnto the letterbox. I owed them nothing.
On the 23rd Jan. I drove to Lancaster and transferred my insurance to my company - one I'd used for over 20 years - they were really good and getting all the refund due to me, showed illegal accessing of the company systems.
The Gestapo pulled me up after I left my insurance company [each event has it's own story] - just to harass - to be seen to be a liar - then I returned to my sister's. I left her house and stayed in a guest house for 4 days - called into the garage and they had NOT sent the DVLA doc. on. I asked for it and dealt with it myself. They had no intention of sending it in. For days then weeks then months [I started to rent at 298 on 4/3/12 after driving to Lewes to deal with outstanding matters from 2011 and living in my car most of Feb.] attempts were made to stealing my car key so I would then have to force my locks to get in and have new locks - their problem was they could not claim I had stolen the car, that I drove without insurance, and that I knew of the GPS - and how I could prove they had not broken the key at all to have a new ignition system fitted.
With amazing luck, my car key was stolen but I had the spare key in my bag so didn't need to force the locks - had another spare cut and so it went on.
Followed into the ladies in students union offices which are not open to all and sundry - at the Uni - washing my hands - my keys placed by the sink disappeared - reported - ignored. I knew it had to be 1 of 2 trolls - again, I'd had my spare in my bag and always keep a spare. 2 garages have looked [April '16 and May '16] to see if they can remove it but said "too sophisticated" and will disable the car if they try to remove it."
[ENDS]
N.B.: Everything to do with this illegal GPS tracking device, including everything above was sent as a complaint to Lancs. police, and their "Investigations Team"s response was - nothing, and thus everything was then forwarded to the Investigations Powers Tribunal [IPT] after filling in all their forms, and sending 15 pages or so of documents pertaining to the device and related items, including Lancs. police's so-called "responses" - the IPT's response has also been - nothing. The woman I spoke to weeks ago at the IPT when chasing up my sending of the IPT forms and related docs. notifying the IPT about this GPS device even told me the IPT tribunal would probably dismiss my contacting them regarding this matter of this illegal GPS device, or deem everything inadmissable - and this was the receptionist on the phone one gets when initially calling in to the! To date, 12 Dec. 17, I am still waiting to hear from the IPT regarding anything to do with the 15 pages of notes and forms sent to them - completely unaccptable!
THE IPCC:
Also, before contacting the IPT, a complaint was made to the IPCC regarding not being able to report serious crimes, which included the
a] installation of the "tracking device" in CW's vehicle,
b] Dorset Police hanging up in me when being contacted by them regarding reporting serious crimes pertaining to Carol Woods to any police,
and
c] Lancs. police ignoring communications to them over the months, and not responding after the 2 Dorset officers who visited myself on 9 June 17 claiming they would be contacting Lancs. police who would then be contacting Carol Woods [no such contact was made, naturally]. Below is my complaint to the IPCC and their response - which was to pass everything back to Lancs. police, who were stonewalling in the first place and responsible for the numerous irregularities anyway!!!, [and still are]:
Thank you for contacting the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). We acknowledge receipt of your email dated 13 June 2017, the contents of which have been filed under the above reference number.
I note from your email that you are unhappy with the police, however it is not clear if you are wishing to submit a formal complaint against the police.
If you wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct against a serving member of the police then the IPCC can forward it on your behalf to the relevant police force. If you do wish to make such a complaint or allegation we will need to be provided with the following information;
WHO? Which police force is your complaint about?
WHERE? Where did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHEN? When did the incident/s happen that led to your complaint?
WHAT? Please describe the circumstances that have led to you feeling the police have treated you badly.
If however you do not wish to make a new complaint or allegation of misconduct, or submit an appeal against a concluded investigation into a previous complaint I do not believe the IPCC can assist you any further at this time.
Please note that all complaints made to the IPCC by law must be forwarded to the 'appropriate authority' for consideration - usually this is the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of the police force concerned. When you submit your complaint in full your details will be passed onto the PSD for consideration.
Yours sincerely
Customer Contact Advisor Independent Police Complaints Commission
(IPCC)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: butlincat <butlincat75@googlemail.com>
Date: 23 June 2017 at 11:14
Subject: IPCC Reference - 2017/087595
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk
Dear IPCC
Meanwhile, the Home Office wrote to send everything regarding this "tracking device" to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal [as already detailed above] - the letter dated 31 August 17, something that Carol did already some time ago - her comment:
Date: 5 September 2017 at 15:46
Subject: Re: Fwd: Win cw
Hi thanks for this; firstly, I have 3 huge files from the Gestapo from 2002 when they claimed to the IPT that they had never heard of me and that I had never lived in Lancaster. That led to all sorts which included the IPT ceasing the FULL INQUIRY into my case after NATIONAL news bulletin April 2006, "The government has ordered an inquiry into how Lancashire conducts its affairs". The Gestapo spoiled all that: the IPT just returned my file to me with no comments. It was March 2008 JUST THE WEEK MIKE TODD WAS MURDERED when the IPT told me in a letter that they thought Carol Woods was an alias and that I was really someone else somewhere else, my sister in fact." [ENDS]

The above are just part of numerous communications to and from UK government departments regarding the appalling and illegal targeting of Carol Woods by certain UK government personnel paid by the taxpayer to act in a responsible and honest manner, which include, especially, the police - local to Ms. Woods and the main force, and the county council, and all connected, including Royal Mail, who refuse to do anything regarding Carol's mail being deliberately diverted and misdelivered, or delivered to her months later - or not delivered at all.
to be continued, when any progress is made with these dubious government departments!
The "Bug Detector" in use: video: https://vid.me/Ckf5

STALKING WOEFULLY IGNORED BY POLICE + OTHER AUTHORITIES 5July17 https://vid.me/cu5y
SPYING ON US - 12mar15 https://vid.me/dXGX
DOMESTIC HACKING - "SNOOPERS CHARTER" 22 March 17 https://vid.me/3YLc
Watch: Edward Snowden Shows How To Make Your Phone ‘Go Black’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4LOyi3EMWU
plus “This System can Trace Calls, Texts, Location of Every Single Mobile Phone”
http://butlincat.blogspot.com/2016/06/watch-edward-snowden-shows-how-to-make.html

STALKING WOEFULLY IGNORED BY POLICE + OTHER AUTHORITIES 5July17 https://vid.me/cu5y